While platforms like X, Rumble, and Gettr are often seen as allowing controversial voices to speak before setting them up for potential destruction, Facebook operates in a very different way. Instead of merely allowing controversial content to thrive temporarily, Facebook has become a central tool for narrative control, actively participating in the suppression of certain viewpoints.
During the 2020 elections and the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Facebook played a significant role in censoring content that didn’t align with the mainstream narrative. Whether it was flagging posts, de-platforming users, or working directly with government agencies, Facebook’s actions were far more coordinated than what we’ve seen on other platforms. In fact, reports suggest that Facebook was working hand-in-hand with those in power to suppress any information that didn’t fit the narrative around these key events.
The Government-Facebook Connection
It’s no secret that Facebook was involved in suppressing information around the 2020 elections, using so-called “fact-checkers” to flag and limit the reach of posts that challenged the official story. COVID-19 discussions were similarly controlled, with Facebook removing content that questioned government-approved narratives or proposed alternative viewpoints. In many ways, Facebook wasn’t just acting as a platform—it was acting as an arm of the establishment.
While platforms like X and Rumble are still, to some degree, open to dissenting voices (at least for now), Facebook has taken a different route: directly collaborating with governments or those in power to control what is shared, liked, or even discussed. This makes Facebook a powerful tool for those seeking to maintain control over public discourse.
Why Facebook Doesn’t Fit the “Trap” Theory
Facebook’s role is different from platforms like X, where controversial voices are allowed to thrive before being set up for a fall. Facebook, on the other hand, actively suppresses voices from the outset. This isn’t just about shadow banning or algorithmic manipulation—it’s about active censorship and cooperation with external entities to shape the narrative in real-time.
That’s why The Realist Juggernaut and others who question mainstream narratives often face severe suppression on Facebook, much more so than on other platforms. The system there isn’t about allowing controversial content for engagement—it’s about maintaining a firm grip on what gets seen and discussed, especially around politically sensitive events.
A Coordinated Effort
What makes Facebook’s involvement particularly alarming is that it shows a direct collaboration between the platform and those in power. Whether it’s the government, big corporations, or other influential entities, Facebook has proven itself to be a reliable tool for maintaining control over what information reaches the public.
By censoring alternative views, especially around elections and public health crises, Facebook is working not just to limit the reach of dissenting voices but to ensure that the broader public remains unaware of the full spectrum of ideas and information available. This suppression has had serious consequences, as it has silenced not just controversial figures but also legitimate discussions that challenge the mainstream narrative.
Where The Realist Juggernaut Stands
This is why platforms like ours face such strong suppression on Facebook. We don’t just engage in controversial discussions—we expose the larger system at play. We question the narratives that are carefully crafted by those in power, and that makes us a target. Facebook’s suppression of our content isn’t just about limiting our reach—it’s about ensuring that people don’t have access to alternative perspectives that challenge the status quo.
By working closely with those who benefit from maintaining control, Facebook has shown itself to be more than just a social media platform. It has become a central piece in the machinery that shapes public opinion, keeps people divided, and prevents real unity and truth from spreading.

