TRJ Cybersecurity — EV2GO Charging Platform Exposed: Authentication Failures Create High-Risk Entry Points Across Global EV Infrastructure

Threat Summary

Category: Industrial Control System Vulnerabilities
Features: Charging station impersonation, session hijacking, denial-of-service potential, backend data manipulation
Delivery Method: Network-based exploitation of authentication and session management flaws
Threat Actor: Financially motivated cyber actors, infrastructure disruption groups, opportunistic exploitation networks

---

A newly disclosed Industrial Control System advisory identifies critical authentication and session-management failures affecting the EV2GO ev2go.io charging management platform. The vulnerabilities, rated CVSS v3 9.4, impact all known versions of the platform and introduce systemic risk across global electric vehicle charging ecosystems.

The exposed weaknesses create conditions in which attackers could impersonate charging stations, hijack legitimate sessions, suppress or misroute traffic, and manipulate operational data flowing to centralized backend infrastructure.

---

Core Narrative

EV2GO, headquartered in the United Kingdom, operates a cloud-based electric vehicle charging management platform deployed worldwide across energy and transportation sectors. The system coordinates authentication, billing reconciliation, session tracking, and communication between distributed charging stations and centralized management servers.

The advisory identifies four critical CVEs affecting all versions of the platform:

• CVE-2026-24731
• CVE-2026-25945
• CVE-2026-20895
• CVE-2026-22890

The vulnerability classes include:

• Missing authentication for critical functions
• Improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts
• Insufficient session expiration
• Insufficiently protected credentials

These weaknesses collectively compromise the trust model between charging endpoints and backend control systems.

In distributed EV infrastructure environments, charging stations rely on backend validation for:

• Session authorization
• User account verification
• Payment processing
• Telemetry reporting
• Load balancing coordination

When authentication mechanisms are incomplete or improperly enforced, attackers may inject rogue devices into the network or manipulate communication pathways between legitimate devices and backend servers.

---

Infrastructure at Risk

Critical Infrastructure Sectors Impacted:

• Energy
• Transportation Systems

EV charging networks now function as load-distributed energy nodes integrated with regional grid management systems. Backend telemetry from charging platforms informs demand forecasting, peak management, and distributed energy balancing.

A compromise within the EV2GO platform could enable:

• False telemetry injection affecting load calculations
• Manipulated charging session records
• Large-scale charging denial-of-service
• Disruption of fleet charging operations
• Cascading effects in high-density urban deployments

Commercial fleets, public transit electrification programs, logistics operators, and municipal charging networks represent potential high-impact targets.

Because deployments span multiple jurisdictions, exploitation in one region may not immediately be correlated with anomalous activity elsewhere without coordinated monitoring.

---

Technical Exposure Assessment

1. Charging Station Impersonation

Missing authentication for critical backend functions introduces the risk of device spoofing. An attacker could register or simulate a charging endpoint, gaining unauthorized interaction privileges within the platform.

Potential outcomes include:

• Fraudulent billing session creation
• Injection of manipulated usage metrics
• Backend resource exhaustion
• Credential harvesting

2. Brute-Force Authentication Abuse

Improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts increases brute-force feasibility. If rate limiting is insufficient, automated credential-guessing attempts may succeed against weak or reused credentials.

Distributed attacks against exposed endpoints may generate denial-of-service conditions or credential compromise.

3. Session Persistence and Replay Risk

Insufficient session expiration allows extended token validity windows. Attackers intercepting authentication tokens could replay sessions or assume control of active charging operations.

Session takeover scenarios may result in:

• Unauthorized charging
• Premature session termination
• Data integrity compromise
• Service instability across clusters

4. Credential Storage Weakness

Insufficiently protected credentials increase the risk of lateral movement if a single node is compromised. Once internal access is achieved, attackers may pivot across backend infrastructure.

---

Policy / Allied Pressure

Electric vehicle infrastructure has become a strategic component of national decarbonization initiatives and transportation modernization efforts. As electrification accelerates, backend authentication weaknesses represent not merely IT configuration flaws but structural exposure within energy-transition infrastructure.

Regulatory scrutiny around EV infrastructure security continues to increase across European and North American markets. Charging operators face heightened compliance expectations regarding:

• Identity assurance
• Data integrity controls
• Remote access hardening
• Network segmentation

Operators managing cross-border infrastructure face additional complexity in incident notification and coordinated remediation.

---

Vendor Defense / Reliance

At the time of advisory publication, no confirmed public exploitation targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported. The absence of confirmed exploitation does not reduce operational risk once vulnerability details circulate.

Organizations operating EV2GO infrastructure should immediately:

• Audit exposed network interfaces
• Restrict Internet-facing authentication endpoints
• Segment charging management networks from corporate systems
• Enforce strict credential rotation
• Implement multi-factor authentication for administrative access
• Review authentication retry thresholds and rate limiting controls
• Validate session expiration enforcement

Remote access should be restricted to hardened and monitored pathways. VPN usage alone does not mitigate authentication-layer weakness if endpoint hygiene is inadequate.

Prior to applying mitigation changes, operators must conduct structured impact analysis to avoid operational disruption of charging continuity.

---

Forecast — 30 Days

• Increased reconnaissance scanning for exposed EV2GO endpoints
• Elevated credential-stuffing attempts targeting authentication interfaces
• Potential release of proof-of-concept exploit code
• Insurance-driven security audits across EV charging operators
• Accelerated regulatory review of EV infrastructure cybersecurity controls

Distributed energy infrastructure remains a visible and symbolic target class for disruption-focused actors.

---

TRJ Verdict

Electric vehicle charging systems now operate at the intersection of transportation continuity and grid stability. Authentication weaknesses inside distributed charging platforms create a convergence point between cyber exploitation and physical infrastructure disruption.

The vulnerabilities identified in EV2GO’s platform reflect a broader structural challenge: rapid electrification expansion outpacing hardened identity verification architecture.

Charging endpoints are no longer simple utility devices. They are grid-integrated network nodes with financial, operational, and strategic value. Authentication is the trust anchor that secures this ecosystem. Where authentication fails, infrastructure integrity weakens.

Electrification without hardened backend identity enforcement introduces preventable exposure. Industrial control system security must scale alongside energy transition strategy.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

🔥 NOW AVAILABLE! 🔥

‎👉 Eclipsera – Apple Music

---

---

---

---

---