TRJ Cybersecurity — SWITCH EV Platform Vulnerabilities Expose Global Charging Infrastructure to Impersonation and Session Hijack Risk

Threat Summary

Category: Industrial Control System Vulnerabilities
Features: Charging station impersonation, session hijacking, backend data manipulation, denial-of-service exposure
Delivery Method: Network-based exploitation of authentication and session management weaknesses
Threat Actor: Financially motivated actors, infrastructure disruption groups, opportunistic network exploiters

---

Critical authentication and session-management vulnerabilities have been disclosed affecting the SWITCH EV charging management platform operating under swtchenergy.com. The weaknesses impact all known versions of the platform and carry a CVSS v3 severity score of 9.4, placing them within the critical tier for industrial control system exposure.

Successful exploitation could allow adversaries to impersonate charging stations, hijack legitimate charging sessions, suppress or reroute platform traffic, and manipulate operational telemetry sent to centralized backend systems.

---

Core Narrative

SWITCH EV, headquartered in the United States, provides cloud-based management infrastructure for electric vehicle charging networks deployed globally. The platform integrates charging station identity verification, billing coordination, energy usage tracking, and remote device management.

The advisory identifies four CVEs affecting all versions of the platform:

• CVE-2026-27767
• CVE-2026-25113
• CVE-2026-25778
• CVE-2026-27773

The vulnerability classes include:

• Missing authentication for critical functions
• Improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts
• Insufficient session expiration
• Insufficiently protected credentials

These weaknesses collectively compromise the identity assurance and session integrity mechanisms fundamental to distributed EV infrastructure.

EV charging networks operate as hybrid IT/OT environments. Field-deployed charging stations communicate continuously with backend servers for authentication, billing reconciliation, firmware management, and telemetry reporting. Any failure in authentication enforcement or credential protection introduces risk to both operational continuity and financial integrity.

---

Infrastructure at Risk

Critical Infrastructure Sectors Impacted:

• Energy
• Transportation Systems

Modern EV infrastructure is integrated into grid load-balancing strategies and urban mobility planning. Charging platforms interface with:

• Public charging hubs
• Commercial fleet depots
• Residential and mixed-use installations
• Municipal electrification programs
• Corporate sustainability initiatives

Backend systems aggregate telemetry that informs demand modeling and power distribution strategies. Manipulation of this data can introduce:

• Artificial load spikes
• False consumption reporting
• Improper billing records
• Operational instability

Large-scale denial-of-service conditions could immobilize fleet operations or disrupt public charging availability during peak usage windows.

Because deployments are worldwide, inconsistent patching or segmentation across regions may produce uneven exposure levels and complicate coordinated defense.

---

Technical Exposure Assessment

1. Charging Station Impersonation

Missing authentication for critical backend functions enables the possibility of rogue device registration. Attackers could simulate legitimate charging endpoints to:

• Submit falsified telemetry
• Initiate unauthorized charging sessions
• Trigger billing anomalies
• Exhaust backend resources

Identity spoofing in distributed charging networks undermines trust between device and control plane.

2. Brute-Force Authentication Abuse

Improper rate limiting allows repeated authentication attempts without sufficient lockout enforcement. Automated credential-stuffing or brute-force campaigns may succeed against weak passwords or reused credentials.

Credential compromise at the backend level enables broader system manipulation.

3. Session Hijacking and Replay

Insufficient session expiration increases token validity windows. If authentication tokens are intercepted or leaked, attackers may replay or hijack active sessions.

Session takeover may result in:

• Forced termination of legitimate charging sessions
• Unauthorized energy draw
• Billing record distortion
• Service instability across clusters

4. Credential Protection Weakness

Insufficiently protected credentials raise the risk of lateral movement within the management environment. Once internal access is achieved, attackers may pivot across charging infrastructure clusters.

---

Policy / Allied Pressure

Electrification initiatives have accelerated globally, placing EV infrastructure at the center of transportation modernization strategies. Cyber resilience within charging networks is increasingly subject to regulatory oversight and compliance review.

Operators managing public-facing charging networks may face:

• Consumer protection scrutiny
• Data privacy obligations
• Energy-sector reporting requirements
• Insurance risk reassessment

As EV infrastructure scales, cybersecurity posture becomes a component of infrastructure reliability and public confidence.

---

Vendor Defense / Reliance

No confirmed public exploitation targeting these vulnerabilities has been reported at the time of disclosure. The absence of reported exploitation does not eliminate risk once technical details circulate within adversarial communities.

Operators of SWITCH EV deployments should:

• Conduct comprehensive asset inventory of exposed endpoints
• Restrict Internet exposure of management interfaces
• Enforce strict network segmentation between charging control systems and corporate IT networks
• Implement multi-factor authentication for administrative access
• Enforce strong password policies and credential rotation
• Validate authentication retry thresholds and lockout mechanisms
• Monitor logs for anomalous session patterns or repeated failed authentication attempts

Remote access pathways should be hardened and monitored. VPN use alone does not compensate for weak authentication logic or insufficient credential protection.

Prior to deploying remediation measures, operators should perform structured impact analysis to ensure charging continuity is maintained during patch cycles.

---

Forecast — 30 Days

• Increased scanning activity targeting exposed SWITCH EV endpoints
• Credential-stuffing campaigns against public-facing authentication interfaces
• Proof-of-concept exploit development in underground communities
• Accelerated patching across fleet charging operators
• Regulatory advisories addressing EV infrastructure authentication hardening

EV charging ecosystems represent distributed, always-on infrastructure nodes with financial and operational leverage.

---

TRJ Verdict

Distributed charging networks are no longer experimental infrastructure. They are embedded into grid operations, transportation planning, and commercial fleet logistics.

Authentication failures within charging platforms introduce a structural weakness at the control plane of electrified transportation. Impersonation and session hijack capabilities are not theoretical inconveniences; they are operational risk multipliers.

As electrification expands, backend identity verification and session integrity must scale proportionally. EV infrastructure security cannot rely on perimeter defenses alone. Identity enforcement is the primary trust boundary.

SWITCH EV operators should treat these vulnerabilities as foundational control-layer exposures requiring immediate mitigation.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

🔥 NOW AVAILABLE! 🔥

‎👉 Eclipsera – Apple Music

---

---

---

---

---