Written by The Realist Juggernaut Staff
Healthcare in America has become a corporate enterprise, and its evolution has worked against the very people it is supposed to serve. From skyrocketing hospital bills to restrictive insurance practices, the system has shifted its focus from care to cash. This article delves into how the corporate-controlled healthcare system operates, its impact on patients, and the key players responsible for perpetuating this crisis.
What once promised simplified, patient-centered care has now become a labyrinth of bureaucracy, profit-driven motives, and diminishing autonomy for medical professionals. These huge corporations aren’t just running our lives; we are their wallets, their lifeline, as they take ours away.
Big Pharma: Profits Over Wellness
At the heart of the corporate healthcare crisis lies Big Pharma, an industry whose priorities often clash with the well-being of patients. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Eli Lilly invest billions in marketing and lobbying to protect their interests while charging exorbitant prices for medications.
- Prescription Costs: Many life-saving medications cost pennies to produce but are sold at prices that bankrupt families. For instance, insulin, a necessity for diabetics, can cost hundreds of dollars per vial, even though it costs just a few dollars to manufacture. Cancer drugs like Revlimid are priced at over $16,000 per month, making treatment unaffordable for many.
- Forced Generic Substitutes: Health insurance companies frequently force patients to use generic name-brand medications instead of the more effective or familiar options prescribed by their doctors. This decision is based on cost-saving agreements with pharmaceutical companies, not patient care.
- Lobbying and Influence: Big Pharma spends billions annually lobbying Congress to block price-control measures and protect their profit margins. These efforts undermine attempts to make medications affordable for the public.
- Patent Manipulation: Pharmaceutical companies often extend patents on medications by making minor tweaks, a practice known as “evergreening.” This blocks generic competition and ensures higher prices for longer periods.
Health Insurance: Denial of Choice
Insurance corporations like UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, and Cigna have introduced layers of restrictions that prioritize profit over patient autonomy:
- Restricted Networks: Patients are often unable to choose their preferred doctors or facilities due to “in-network” limitations. Those who seek care outside of these networks face astronomical out-of-pocket costs, creating a system where your health is tied to your employer’s insurance plan.
- Prior Authorizations: Necessary treatments often require time-consuming approvals from insurance companies, delaying care and sometimes resulting in deteriorating health. For instance, patients have had chemotherapy delayed due to red tape, worsening their conditions.
- Coverage Denials: Even after paying premiums, patients face denied claims for essential procedures or medications, leaving them to fight battles while managing their health conditions. Many families go into debt trying to pay for treatments denied by their insurance providers.
- High Deductibles and Copays: Insurance plans increasingly shift costs to patients, with high deductibles that make care unaffordable until you’ve spent thousands out-of-pocket. Copays for specialists and medications add another layer of financial strain.
UnitedHealthcare stands out as one of the most controversial insurers. Known for its aggressive claim denials, it often forces patients to navigate exhausting appeals processes. The company’s restrictive networks limit patient options, especially in rural areas, leaving many without adequate access to care. Their business model prioritizes cost savings over patient outcomes, and the frequent denial of mental health treatments has led to public outcry and lawsuits.
Cigna, another giant, is notorious for burdensome prior authorization requirements. Patients often experience significant delays in receiving essential care, as every step of their treatment is subjected to approval. For cancer patients or those with chronic illnesses, these delays can be devastating, worsening conditions and increasing mortality risks. Additionally, Cigna has been criticized for its narrow provider networks, which force patients to travel long distances for basic care.
The Struggle of Medical Professionals
Doctors and other healthcare providers are increasingly losing their autonomy to corporate mandates. Hospitals, health systems, and insurance companies now dictate how physicians practice medicine, severely impacting the quality of patient care. Physicians are often pressured to prioritize profits over proper treatment plans, with some being required to follow strict protocols that limit their ability to make independent decisions tailored to their patients’ needs. Hospital administrators and corporate boards enforce quotas for diagnostic tests, surgeries, and patient throughput, turning medical care into a numbers game rather than a healing practice. Additionally, doctors are burdened with an overwhelming amount of administrative work, leaving less time for patient interactions and holistic care.
- Corporate Oversight: Doctors are told which procedures to prioritize, how long to spend with patients, and which treatments to recommend based on corporate policies. These policies are often dictated by financial metrics rather than medical necessity, forcing doctors to balance their ethical obligations against corporate demands. For example, some hospitals set quotas for diagnostic tests like MRIs or CT scans to maximize revenue, regardless of whether these tests are in the patient’s best interest. Furthermore, physicians are sometimes pressured to discharge patients prematurely to free up beds for new admissions, jeopardizing recovery and increasing the likelihood of readmissions. This relentless focus on profitability erodes the quality of care, leaving healthcare providers frustrated and patients at risk.
- Fear of Retaliation: Physicians who resist these directives risk losing their licenses or being excluded from insurance networks. Some doctors are even penalized for spending too much time with patients instead of sticking to rigid schedules. Additionally, whistleblowers who call out unethical practices often face career-ending consequences, including blacklisting within the industry. Hospitals and insurance companies may flag these physicians as “troublemakers,” making it nearly impossible for them to find work elsewhere. This culture of fear discourages medical professionals from advocating for their patients or challenging profit-driven policies, further eroding trust in the healthcare system. The result is a workforce forced to comply with corporate mandates at the expense of personalized, high-quality care.
- Burnout: This control has led to unprecedented burnout among healthcare workers, with many leaving the profession entirely. A 2022 study found that nearly 60% of doctors and nurses reported experiencing burnout, driven largely by administrative burdens, long working hours, and the growing lack of autonomy in their roles. This burnout not only impacts the mental and physical health of healthcare professionals but also directly affects patient care, as overworked and stressed staff struggle to provide the quality of care patients deserve. Furthermore, the systemic failure to address these issues has created a vicious cycle where fewer healthcare workers remain in the profession, increasing the workload and stress on those who stay.
- Nursing Challenges: Nurses face similar pressures, with unsafe patient-to-staff ratios becoming the norm. Chronic underpayment for their critical roles further exacerbates the issue, leaving many nurses feeling undervalued and overworked. This combination of stressors not only endangers patients by reducing the quality of care but also leads to high turnover rates and a growing shortage of qualified nursing staff. The lack of adequate support and resources has left nurses working long hours in grueling conditions, often sacrificing their mental and physical health to keep up with demands. These challenges highlight a systemic disregard for the well-being of healthcare workers, prioritizing cost-cutting measures over sustainable, patient-focused care.
The Ambulance Crisis: A Ride That Breaks the Bank
Emergency transportation, once a straightforward service, is now a financial nightmare. Private ambulance companies, such as AMR (American Medical Response), often charge $1,000 or more for a short trip to the nearest hospital. Insurance may cover only a fraction of these costs, leaving patients with massive bills for a service they had no choice but to use.
AMR has come under fire for its exorbitant fees and predatory billing practices. In some cases, patients have been charged over $5,000 for rides lasting less than 15 minutes. Many services are deliberately kept out-of-network, ensuring higher charges for insured individuals. Despite public backlash, AMR continues to operate with little regulatory oversight, leaving patients financially devastated after emergencies.
- Surprise Billing: Many ambulance services are “out-of-network,” meaning patients are hit with surprise bills after an emergency. These charges can sometimes exceed $3,000 for a single ride.
- Lack of Regulation: Ambulance services are often exempt from price controls, allowing private companies to charge whatever they want. This leaves patients vulnerable in life-or-death situations.
- Air Ambulance Costs: In rural areas, air ambulances may be the only option, with costs exceeding $40,000 per trip. Insurance coverage for these services is often inadequate, leaving families to shoulder the burden.
Hospitals: Billing Gone Wild
Hospitals, including major chains like HCA Healthcare and Tenet Healthcare, are notorious for their opaque and inflated billing practices:
- Facility Fees: Patients are charged hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars simply for walking through hospital doors. These fees are added on top of the costs of treatment, making even minor visits extraordinarily expensive.
- Itemized Bills: Everything from a bandage to a dose of Tylenol can cost ten times the retail price, creating shocking hospital bills that patients can’t contest due to lack of transparency.
- Profit Over Care: These institutions prioritize high-profit procedures over preventative care or community health initiatives. Elective surgeries and high-margin diagnostics are heavily marketed, while low-revenue services like mental health care are often underfunded or unavailable.
- Nonprofit Hospitals Acting Like For-Profits: Many hospitals claim nonprofit status while amassing billions in revenue and paying executives exorbitant salaries. These “nonprofits” frequently sue low-income patients for unpaid bills.
HCA Healthcare, one of the largest hospital chains in the U.S., has repeatedly faced criticism for prioritizing profit over patient care. With a strong focus on high-margin services, HCA has been accused of neglecting lower-income patients and underfunding essential services like emergency care. Investigative reports reveal that HCA aggressively pursues debt collection, targeting uninsured or underinsured individuals with lawsuits, further exacerbating the financial burdens on vulnerable populations.
Nursing and Rehab Facilities: Neglect Fueled by Profits
Long-term care facilities, including nursing homes and rehabilitation centers, are plagued by understaffing, inadequate care, and profit-driven management:
- Lack of Staffing: Facilities run by companies like Genesis Healthcare and Kindred Healthcare often operate with bare-bones staffing levels, leading to neglect and poor outcomes for patients. Residents frequently go without basic hygiene or timely medical attention. Overworked staff are unable to meet the needs of patients, resulting in medical errors, untreated conditions, and increased mortality rates.
- Cost Cutting: Corners are cut on everything from staff training to equipment maintenance, further compromising patient safety. In some cases, residents have been left without heat or air conditioning for extended periods. Basic amenities, like nutritious meals and proper medical equipment, are frequently sacrificed in favor of budgetary savings, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and health risks among residents.
- Focus on Revenue: Instead of prioritizing recovery, these facilities push patients through as quickly as possible to maximize turnover and revenue. Families are often pressured to accept subpar care due to a lack of alternative options. Additionally, high fees for services such as physical therapy or specialized care are often imposed, despite minimal oversight or accountability for the quality of these services.
- State of Crisis: While the COVID-19 pandemic brought immense challenges, it served to shine a harsh spotlight on the dire conditions in many nursing homes. Chronic understaffing and inadequate infection control measures led to tens of thousands of preventable deaths, highlighting systemic issues that have plagued these facilities for years. This public health crisis also exposed the glaring lack of emergency preparedness and the reluctance of many corporations to invest in safeguards that could protect patients and staff. Investigations revealed longstanding problems, such as insufficient protective equipment, poorly trained staff, and corporate cost-cutting measures that prioritized profits over welfare. Families of residents reported heartbreaking neglect, with many unable to communicate with their loved ones due to isolation protocols. This crisis underscored the urgent need for reform in how nursing homes are managed and regulated to ensure dignity and care for the most vulnerable.
Genesis Healthcare, a major player in the nursing home industry, has faced numerous lawsuits for neglect and abuse. Reports detail horrifying conditions, including patients being left in soiled bedding for hours and essential treatments being delayed due to understaffing. Despite these failures, Genesis continues to expand, focusing on profits over patient safety.
How Loopholes Shield Negligent Facilities from Accountability
Despite glaring issues and low ratings, many nursing homes and long-term care facilities avoid meaningful accountability due to systemic loopholes. These gaps in regulation and enforcement enable corporations and their owners to evade fines, penalties, and even public scrutiny. Accountability is crucial, especially when entrusted with the responsibility for other people’s lives. Here’s how it happens:
Ownership and Corporate Structure
- Shell Companies and LLCs: Many facilities are owned by layers of limited liability companies (LLCs) or shell corporations. These structures shield the real owners from legal and financial liability. If a fine is issued, it\u2019s often directed at the facility itself, leaving the owners untouched.
- Ownership Transfers: When a facility comes under scrutiny, ownership can be transferred to another entity. This tactic resets oversight and evades previous citations, even though the same operators often remain behind the scenes.
Regulatory Weaknesses
- Self-Reported Data: Many systems, including Medicare\u2019s Nursing Home Compare, rely on data reported by the facilities themselves. This creates opportunities for manipulation, such as inflating staffing levels or downplaying incidents of neglect.
- Inconsistent Inspections: Regulators with limited resources often issue warnings or remediation plans rather than imposing fines. Facilities that promise to make improvements are given leniency, even if the changes are superficial or temporary.
Legal Maneuvers
- Appeals and Settlements: Facilities frequently contest citations, dragging out the appeals process for months or even years. In some cases, fines are reduced or dismissed entirely through negotiated settlements.
- Bankruptcy Shields: When fines or lawsuits loom, facilities can file for bankruptcy to avoid payments. Ownership often reorganizes under a new entity and resumes operations with little consequence.
Political and Financial Influence
- Lobbying Efforts: Ownership groups often wield significant influence through lobbying or political contributions, which can soften regulatory enforcement. In some cases, legislative frameworks are tailored to protect corporate interests rather than residents.
- Weak Legislative Oversight: Existing laws prioritize facility operations over accountability, limiting regulators\u2019 ability to enforce stricter penalties.
Impact on Residents and Families
- Temporary Compliance Fixes: During inspections, facilities may temporarily increase staffing or improve cleanliness to pass checks. Once inspections are over, they revert to cost-cutting measures that harm residents.
- Limited Public Awareness: Many residents and families are unaware of their rights or how to report issues, allowing problems to persist without external pressure.
The Need for Reform
To hold negligent facilities accountable and protect residents, systemic changes are necessary:
- Transparency Requirements: Laws mandating full disclosure of ownership structures and financial dealings can close the loopholes exploited by shell companies.
- Unannounced Inspections: Surprise checks ensure facilities can\u2019t temporarily fix issues for compliance purposes.
- Penalties Targeting Owners: Fines and lawsuits should extend to parent companies and individual owners, not just the facility.
- Independent Oversight: Third-party audits and reviews can prevent manipulation of self-reported data.
- Public Education: Increasing awareness of residents\u2019 rights and reporting mechanisms empowers families to take action against neglect.
Facilities with poor ratings and systemic failures must face real consequences. Closing these loopholes is not just about justice; it\u2019s about ensuring vulnerable populations receive the care and dignity they deserve.
How Loopholes Also Protect Negligent Hospitals
The same systemic loopholes that shield nursing homes from accountability apply to hospitals as well. Despite being critical institutions for public health, hospitals can exploit similar gaps in oversight, ownership structures, and enforcement mechanisms to avoid consequences for poor performance or misconduct. Here’s how these issues parallel the nursing home industry:
Ownership and Corporate Structures
- Private Equity and LLCs: Many hospitals are owned by private equity firms or operate under complex LLC structures. These entities prioritize profit over patient care, while shielding owners from financial and legal repercussions.
- Shifting Ownership: When hospitals face lawsuits or penalties, ownership can be transferred to another entity, erasing liabilities and allowing the same operators to continue running the facility under a new name.
Regulatory Weaknesses
- Self-Reported Metrics: Similar to nursing homes, hospitals often self-report key performance data, such as infection rates, staffing levels, and patient outcomes. These figures can be manipulated to paint a rosier picture of care quality.
- Inconsistent Penalties: Regulatory agencies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issue fines or reduce reimbursements for low-performing hospitals, but enforcement is often weak or delayed.
Legal Maneuvers
- Appeals and Settlements: Hospitals frequently contest fines or lawsuits, leveraging expensive legal teams to negotiate reduced penalties or dismissals.
- Bankruptcy Shields: Similar to nursing homes, hospitals can declare bankruptcy to escape financial obligations, reorganize, and continue operations with little accountability.
Political and Financial Influence
- Lobbying Power: Hospital corporations and private equity firms spend millions lobbying legislators and regulatory agencies to weaken oversight and avoid stricter penalties.
- Influence on Legislation: Laws governing healthcare facilities often prioritize financial stability and operations over stringent accountability, leaving gaps that allow poor-performing hospitals to continue business as usual.
Impact on Patients and Communities
- Temporary Compliance Measures: Hospitals often address deficiencies only during inspections or audits. Once the scrutiny is over, cost-cutting measures resurface, leading to inadequate staffing, outdated equipment, and compromised patient care.
- Limited Reporting Channels: Patients and families may be unaware of how to report poor care or file complaints, further enabling hospitals to evade accountability.
The Path Forward for Hospital Reform
Just as with nursing homes, systemic reforms are needed to hold hospitals accountable for poor care and operational failures:
- Transparent Ownership: Laws should mandate clear disclosure of hospital ownership, including private equity and corporate stakeholders.
- Independent Audits: Third-party reviews of hospital performance can prevent manipulation of self-reported metrics.
- Stronger Enforcement: Regulatory bodies must impose meaningful penalties, including targeting parent companies and owners, not just the facility itself.
- Public Reporting: Patients and communities should have access to easy-to-understand information about hospital performance, enabling informed decisions about care.
- Whistleblower Protections: Strengthened protections for staff who report unsafe practices or poor care can encourage accountability from within.
The parallels between nursing homes and hospitals reveal a broader issue in the healthcare system: a prioritization of profit over care. Closing these loopholes in hospitals is just as critical to ensuring that patients receive the quality care they deserve without suffering from systemic negligence.
Simplified Care, Now a Hassle
What was once a relatively straightforward process—seeing a doctor, receiving care, and paying reasonable fees—has become an overwhelming ordeal:
- Administrative Burdens: Patients are bombarded with paperwork, insurance disputes, and billing errors that take months to resolve. This complexity discourages many from seeking care altogether.
- Out-of-Pocket Costs: Even with insurance, deductibles, co-pays, and out-of-pocket maximums leave many patients unable to afford necessary care. Medical credit cards and predatory loans are becoming common ways to cover these expenses.
- Medical Bankruptcy: Healthcare costs are the leading cause of bankruptcy in the United States, with millions of Americans drowning in medical debt. Families are often forced to choose between paying for medications or basic necessities like rent and groceries.
A Call to Action
The corporate healthcare system is failing patients and healthcare workers alike. To reclaim a system that prioritizes health over wealth, we must not only identify the flaws but also take decisive action. While we fight for what’s right, we need to follow through with the following steps:
- Demand Transparency: Push for clear, itemized billing and full disclosure of insurance and hospital practices.
- Advocate for Policy Changes: Support legislation that limits corporate influence in healthcare, enforces price caps on medications, and restores autonomy to healthcare providers.
- Boycott Negligent Companies: Hold corporations accountable by choosing alternatives and supporting local, patient-focused providers where possible.
- Support Healthcare Worker Advocacy: Stand with healthcare professionals fighting against corporate overreach and for better patient care.
- Educate Yourself: Learn about your rights as a patient and the true costs of your healthcare. Knowledge is the first step toward systemic change.
The corporate grip on healthcare and everything else in our life is tightening, but it is not unbreakable. Recognizing the problem is the first step toward demanding and creating change. Patients, healthcare workers, and policymakers must unite to dismantle a system that has put profits over people for far too long. We are up against a mammoth system when it comes to these corporations, one with deep pockets, powerful lobbying arms, and an entrenched network of influence. However, history has shown that even the mightiest systems can be challenged when people stand together with purpose and determination. Change begins with awareness, followed by collective action, and the time to act is now.


My sister-in-law used to work for HCA. Thank God she retired. And HCA owned the hospital where the ambulance took my husband (her older brother) when he had an ischemic stroke October 2022. We got a raft of bills, as you described, from the EMT billing company, MRI, CT scan billing companies (sometimes the same company) but for the taking of the scans, the radiologist, and reader of the scans. It was hard to understand and I often texted her to decipher all that crap for us. If I had not had a tech background I still may not have grasped it all. Not to mention that I had to talk with each doctor and specialist that came to see my husband while he was in the cardiac unit! I had to ask them questions and text them to my sister-in-law to get layman’s answers. My husband could barely talk at that time and we were scared/overwhelmed. Later I told him, “Now I know why so many people died in hospitals from COVID!”
They even dropped him when they took him for his MRI!
And he received ‘good’ care!
Sheila, thank you so much for sharing your experience. I can’t even begin to imagine how overwhelming and scary that time must have been for you and your husband. The sheer complexity of the billing process and the amount of coordination required on your part is mind-boggling—and that’s on top of the stress of dealing with a medical emergency.
It’s heartbreaking that even when someone receives what is considered ‘good’ care, there are still these massive gaps in communication, accountability, and patient support. The fact that your sister-in-law’s knowledge helped you navigate it all shows just how hard it is for those without such resources to cope.
And they dropped him during the MRI transport? That’s beyond unacceptable. Stories like yours really highlight the deep systemic issues in healthcare. Thank you for sharing this—it’s a reminder of how far we still need to go to ensure that care is truly patient-centered and not so fragmented.
Yes, the one lone orderly that took my husband for the MRI (and said I couldn’t go with them downstairs to that room), didn’t LOCK the wheels on the stretcher so when he went to help my husband up, my husband fell flat on the floor! I got this straight from my husband a couple days later when he could whisper a few words. When the Rapid Response Team (6 or so people) brought my husband back to his cardiac care unit room, they were talking over each other and shooed me out of the room. Being an analyst, I listened intently at the doorway, but all it sounded like to me was that they were covering their asses (CYA)! It was scary because the lead guy finally came to me and asked, “Has your husband had any history of a-fib, passing out, etc. I said no, he’s never even been to a hospital for anything in his life until now! Thankfully, I didn’t panic. And thankfully, Richard only had two severely bruised tows—no broken bones! I would have sued them if anything worse had happened to him. Even his sister was shocked that had happened when Richard was dehydrated and in such bad shape (having not been allowed to drink any water or eat anything in 24 hours). They had to wait for two days before giving him water until the overworked speech therapist could do an aspiration test on him.
Sheila, I can’t even imagine how terrifying that must have been for you and Richard. The fact that the orderly didn’t lock the stretcher wheels and your husband fell is beyond negligent—it’s horrifying. To make matters worse, the lack of transparency from the Rapid Response Team and their apparent focus on covering themselves rather than addressing your concerns is a stark example of the communication issues so many people face in these situations.
It’s a relief to hear that Richard only suffered bruised toes and no broken bones, but the entire experience sounds traumatic, especially given how dehydrated and vulnerable he already was. Making you wait two days for an aspiration test, simply because the speech therapist was overworked, speaks volumes about the strain on hospital staff and the systemic flaws in patient care. You should never have had to experience that.
One of the biggest things that needs to change is the right for loved ones to be present. You should have been allowed to stay with Richard unless there was a clear reason otherwise, like someone overreacting and disrupting care. It’s frustrating how hospitals act like they control everything the moment you’re admitted, as if patients and families lose their basic rights. That’s something that absolutely needs to change.
That’s all so true, John, and comforting to read. In that moment though, all I could do was be thankful that I was even allowed to visit Richard in his cardiac ward room because up until a month or so prior, hospitals had not allowed any visitors (due to COVID restrictions)! I did ask if I could spend the night next to him in the hospital bedside chair, but they wouldn’t let me. He was also in a semi-private room. He had Medicare but no other insurance, and apparently he was lucky just to have what he got!
Medicare is a whole other topic! He only has ’part A.’
Thank you again for your support tonight. I guess those events were traumatic for me because here I am still writing about it. Ugh
Sheila, that is definitely a traumatic situation in itself, and it’s heartbreaking that even something as simple as wanting to stay by Richard’s side wasn’t allowed—you should have been allowed to. Moments like that show just how much more compassionate and flexible our healthcare system needs to be—because patients and their families shouldn’t feel so powerless during critical times.
The fact that he only had Medicare Part A and was still lucky to get what he did really underscores the limitations so many face with our healthcare system. It’s a whole other conversation, like you said, but it ties right back to the bigger issue of accessibility and fairness in care.
I completely understand why these events were traumatic for you. It’s not easy to go through something like that and just move on—it stays with you. I really appreciate you sharing your story tonight, and I hope it’s a small comfort knowing you’re not alone in feeling this way. You were there for Richard in every way you could be, and that’s something to hold onto. 😎
You are sooo right, John. Thank you so much!
You’re welcome, Sheila! 😎
I’m going to share my experiences with health services in the US vs the UK. https://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?AuthorID=151208&id=66086
Thank you so much for sharing your experiences and insights, Michael. It’s incredibly eye-opening to read such a personal and detailed comparison between the U.S. and UK healthcare systems. Your stories highlight the profound differences in how each system operates and the impact they have on individuals and families.
The challenges you faced in the U.S., like the hospital bills and financial stress after medical emergencies, are unfortunately all too common and really underscore the frustrations many have with the privatized system. On the other hand, your experiences with the NHS demonstrate how a public healthcare model can alleviate those concerns, even if it’s not perfect.
Your perspective adds so much to the ongoing conversation about healthcare reform, and I think it’s important for more people to hear stories like yours. Thank you again for sharing, and I hope both you and your family are doing well.
Thank you John. I have had in the past, Americans try to lecture me on how the NHS doesn’t work. One said he saw on the news that the UK government was looking for a way out of it. That was more than ten years ago and there is no talk of such a thing happening here.
You’re welcome, Michael. It’s frustrating when people make assumptions about systems they’ve never experienced firsthand. The NHS, while not perfect, has clearly provided invaluable care for so many people, and the idea that the UK would ‘look for a way out’ seems more like a misconception than reality.
It’s interesting how media narratives can distort perceptions, especially when comparing healthcare systems. I’m glad to hear that the NHS continues to serve its purpose despite challenges.
I loved your article, Michael. It wasn’t let me comment there but I clicked Like!
I am so sorry you had issues with medical services in the USA, especially as a Marine! Damn our VA needs to do better! I know from other Veterans that some VA hospitals are much better than others. That needs to change!
Thank you Sheila.