SURVEILLANCE NATION: Canadian Provincial Police Linked to Use of Military-Grade Spyware ‘Graphite’ — Oversight Absent, Trust in Jeopardy

Comments (124) on “SURVEILLANCE NATION: Canadian Provincial Police Linked to Use of Military-Grade Spyware ‘Graphite’ — Oversight Absent, Trust in Jeopardy”

1. If the foundation flawed, the entire building must come down. The Roman new testament counterfeit fundamentally erroneous. Regardless the pigs ear of the Catholic Church or the opposing pigs ear of the Protestant Church, no silk purse possible to make from either treif pig ears.

   Prominent leader of the Protestant Reformation in Switzerland during the 16th century, specifically in Zurich. Zwingli’s teachings emphasized the authority of Scripture, yet failed to move beyond sophomoric translations made by Catholic bible scholars. He did not encourage people to learn the original Hebrew T’NaCH. His opposition to the Catholic reliance upon saint worship and employment of images truly a minor issue seeing that he failed to examine the T’NaCH as a Hebrew and Aramaic text. Hence Swiss Protestantism all show and no go just like Catholic practices. Only he masturbated with his opposing hand.

   Failure to engage in the original Hebrew/Aramaic texts amounts to tits on a boar hog undergraduate scholarship. He failed to address the Nicene perversion which employed theology to create a Trinity God belief system as the standard of faith RATHER than the Torah definition of faith as righteous Justice pursue! The retarded Protestant Reformation compares to a child born XXX or XXY chromosome mutation.

   The emphasis on original texts, such as the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and the complexities of early Christian doctrine, is a significant aspect of theological scholarship and debate, which Zwingli theology utterly failed to explore and grasp. The Protestant revolt – its failure to address the Central Nicene Council utter perversion of faith, comparable to the fictional mythology of Mary’s virgin birth abomination which directly imported Zeus as the father of Hercules.

   The Nicene Creed negates the revelation that nothing in the Heavens, Seas, or Earth compares to God. The Nicene Creed, established in 325 CE, was intended to unify Christian belief regarding the nature of Christ and the Trinity, affirming the divinity of Jesus and his relationship to God the Father. It ignored the T’NaCH text which openly declared that “God is not a Man”. Furthermore, the Protestant Reformation utterly failed to address the elephant locked inside the China Closet…the mitzva of Moshiach — an Oral Torah commandment. Oral Torah expressed as T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law. The bible translations all universally failed to turn to the language of the T’NaCH to define the critical terms within the language of the T’NaCH itself. The term prophet does not mean a seer who foresees the future. Seers who claimed to foresee the future the T’NaCH referred to them as ‘false prophets’. The gospel narrative wherein it makes the claim that Jesus fulfilled the words of the prophets defines the T’NaCH definition of ”false prophesy”.

   Translations, let’s start with the opening word of בראשית – Genesis. בראשית contains within its 6 letters ברית אש, ראש בית, and ב’ ראשית. The latter serves as a בנין אב/precedent (Torah being a common law legalism which the new testament forgery failed to grasp.) for the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart; comparable to the struggle between Esau and Yaacov in the womb of Rivka. Yet when the students of JeZeus asked him to teach them how to pray? JeZeus failed to understand that Torah tefillah, which learns from kre’a shma precedent, a matter of the heart.

   Meaning a person dedicates holy to HaShem tohor middot which quicken the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart and not the tuma middot of the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart. JeZeus falsely instructed that his Father God lived in the Heavens rather than within the Heart as the brit sworn between the opposing cut in half pieces internalized the dedication of tohor middot as the expression of the revelation of the 13 tohor middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev ‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו. Just as HaShem a spirit and not a word so too all these 13 middot – spirits and not word translations. The Yatzir Ha’Ra learns from the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב, who lacked fear of אלהים, translated the revelation of the Name contained within the first Sinai commandment, the definition of observance of all Torah commandments לשמה או לא לשמה – something like Shakespeare’s: To be or not To be – that is the question! JeZeus falsely taught his students that prayer directed to some Father God who lived in the Heavens – no different than Father Zeus.

   Worse the counterfeit new testament Roman forgery failed to grasp that the opening Book of בראשית introduces the subject of the “creation” of the chosen Cohen people through the dedication of tohor time oriented commandments; like as specifically found in tefillah such as the mitzva of kre’a shma. Tefillah separates and discerns between Yatzir vs. Yatzir like the mitzva of shabbat discerns between Shabbat & Chol, between מלאכה from עבודה. Therefore the false messiah god JeZeus – totally ignorant in how to pray and how to keep shabbat.

   False the Koran’s Tawhid Monotheism most certainly does not align with the revelation of the Tribal God of Sinai. Both Xtianity and Islam teach the trief theological declaration of God as a Universal God. The Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the revelation of the Torah at Sinai revealed a local Tribal God rather than a Universal God who lives in the Heavens like as Zeus and Jesus.

   The Torah story of Israel in Egyptian slavery, it recognizes that other Gods live. The priests of Par’o called upon their Gods to turn water into blood – as a powerful example that the Torah rejects the Xtian and Muslim theology of Monotheism. Therefore since both religions demand from their followers to worship different Gods and both religions do not obey the commandment to obey the Torah לשמה ie first Sinai commandments as the basis of all tohor time-oriented Avot commandments which defines the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore both JeZeus and Muhammad = false prophets.

   Mishnah
   The Torah reveals a localized understanding of God, specifically as the God of Israel, and rejects the notion of a universal deity as presented in Christianity and Islam. This understanding is foundational to the Jewish faith and is articulated through the commandments given at Sinai.
   Gemara
   Challenge 1:

   Is it not written in the Torah that HaShem is the Creator of the heavens and the earth, implying a universal aspect to His nature? The Torah employs the language in the act of Creation אלהים.

   Resolution:

   While the Torah does declare HaShem as the Creator, but rather אלהים, this does not necessitate a universal worship of Him by all nations. The specific Torah oath alliance made with Israel at Sinai establishes a unique relationship, indicating that while HaShem inclusive with אלהים as the Creator, The Sinai revelation of השם within the first commandment serves as the foundation for all the Torah commandments thereafter. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai directed specifically to the chosen Cohen people alone.

   Challenge 2:

   But did not the prophets, such as Isaiah, proclaim that all nations will eventually recognize the one true God? Resolution:

   Indeed, the prophets speak of a future recognition of HaShem by all nations, when these nations recognize Israel as the Chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. Neither the new testament forgery nor the koran validate Israel as the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. The koran replaces Yishmael for Yitzak at the Akadah. The prophetic vision of Goyim acceptance of Israel as the chosen Cohen people hardly qualifies as the exalted theologies of belief in One God.

   Challenge 3:

   How can one assert that the existence of other gods is acknowledged in the Torah, as seen in the plagues of Egypt, without undermining the principle of monotheism? Resolution: The Torah acknowledges the existence of other gods in the context of idolatry and the challenges faced by the Israelites, whose Yatzir Ha’Ra incites them to assimilate and intermarry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the sages teach that the mother determines the Jewishness of the child, based upon the Torah negative commandment for the chosen Cohen people not to marry Goyim women. Therefore among Cohonim the father determines the status of Cohen children and not the mother. The Torah commandment to remember the redemption from Egyptian slavery, who demonstrates His power wherein the 10 plagues judges the Gods of Egypt. This Torah narrative reinforces the concept that while other Gods may be worshipped, they ultimately powerless comparable to an idol carved from the wood of a tree. That same wood used to heat ones’ house and cook ones’ food!

   Challenge 4:

   If the Torah is meant solely for Israel, how do we reconcile the commandment to be a “light unto the nations”? Resolution: The commandment to be a “light unto the nations” does not imply that the Torah’s laws apply universally but rather that Israel’s adherence to the commandments serves as a model of ethical and moral behavior. This role is to inspire other nations to recognize the wisdom of the Torah – held with respect and awe – rather than kicking the door of the Sukkah because its too hot.

   Challenge 5:

   What of the teachings of Jesus and Muhammad, who both claimed to fulfill the prophecies of the Hebrew Scriptures? Resolution: The definitions of prophecy in the Tanakh emphasize moral and ethical guidance rather than mere foretelling of events. Therefore, the claims of Jesus and Muhammad to fulfill the prophecies, their teachings diverge from the core principles of the Torah, do not align with the true prophetic tradition. The revelation of the Torah presents HaShem as humbly as a localized deity for Israel, supported by the text of the Torah, the prophetic literature, and the historical context of the Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov oath alliances.

   Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35-107 CE), emphasized the idea of the New Covenant as superseding the Old Covenant, suggesting that the laws of the Torah were no longer binding on Christians. He viewed the Jewish law as a precursor to the grace found in Christ. In his letters, Ignatius often contrasts the “old” and “new” covenants, implying that the teachings of Jesus fulfill and replace the Torah. This interpretation overlooks the ongoing significance of the Yom Kippur remembered Sin of the Golden Calf replacement theology wherein HaShem made the sanctification of His Name by doing t’shuva and where HaShem annulled the vow made to Moshe to make of his seed the chosen Cohen people rather than the oaths sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

   Justin Martyr (c. 100-165 CE), argued that the Jewish people had failed to recognize the true meaning of the Scriptures and that the Church had inherited the promises made to Israel. He claimed that the Church was the “new Israel.” In his “Dialogue with Trypho,” Justin asserts that the prophecies concerning the Messiah are fulfilled in Jesus, thereby suggesting that the oath alliance sworn at Sinai utterly irrelevant for Xtians. This theology utterly rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, replaced by the Romen new testament forgery.

   Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE), likewise embraced the sin of the Golden Calf “replacement theology,” which posits that the Church has replaced Israel as the chosen people of God. He viewed the Old Testament as primarily a historical account that pointed to the New Testament. Clearly this theology failed to distinguish that the prophets instructed Israel through prophetic mussar – applicable to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people. In “City of God,” Augustine argues that the Jewish people are no longer the recipients of God’s promises, which misinterprets the enduring nature of the Sinai oath brit alliance which Chag Yom Kippur remembers that even HaShem cannot profane a Torah oath.

   Islamic Jurisprudence and its Quranic Interpretation. Islamic teachings often present the Quran as a final revelation that supersedes previous scriptures, including the Torah. This perspective implies that the Sinai revelation accepted by the Israelites – no longer applicable. Verses such as Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:44-48) suggest that the Quran confirms previous scriptures but also asserts its authority over them. This interpretation can lead to the view that the Sinai covenant is obsolete, which contrasts with Jewish beliefs about the eternal nature of sworn Torah oaths.

   Hadith Literature, emphasizes that the Jewish and Christian communities have deviated from the true path, suggesting that their interpretations of the covenant are flawed. This leads to a dismissal of the significance of the Sinai covenant in Jewish tradition. Islamic Legal Theory (Fiqh) often emphasizes the Quran and Hadith as the primary sources of law. This marginalization of the ethical teachings found in the Torah simply a different Gold Calf replacement theology. The interpretations of post-Sinai covenantal concepts by early Church Fathers and in Islamic jurisprudence reflect significant theological shifts that diverge from the original intent and understanding of the Sinai sworn oath alliances.

   To contrast the distortions of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and universal monotheism with Torah halachic examples, we can examine how each of these concepts diverges from the principles established in the halachic-mussar tradition. This approach will highlight the foundational teachings of Judaism and their implications for understanding God, prophecy, and ethical behavior. The concept of the Trinity posits that God exists as three distinct persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) in one essence. This theological construct is central to Xtian belief but is not found in Jewish thought. The Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) declares, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.” Where the word One does not declare Monotheism but rather that the 3 sworn oaths made by Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov “remembered” and One within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen peoples’ hearts. Both T’NaCH common law prophetic mussar and Talmudic common law halachic ritual practices fundamentally abhor avoda zarah as Av tumah spirits which profane the heart through the median of the Yatzir Ha’Ra.

   The virgin birth of Jesus is a key doctrine in Xtianity, asserting that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary, thus emphasizing the replacement Trinity theology. The concept of a virgin birth undermines the traditional understanding of familial and tribal connections, which are crucial for the re-establishment of the Tribal Republic remembered through the First Commonwealth. The laws of family purity (Taharat HaMishpacha) and the significance of marital relations in Jewish life highlight the importance of human relationships in the context of procreation. The notion of a virgin birth aligns with the Greek mythology and the birth of Hercules a Greek Man-God.

   The idea of universal monotheism, as presented in both Xtianity and Islam, suggests that all people are called to worship one God, directly declaring the specific oath Chosen Cohen People brit alliance, that this Torah relationship – no longer relevant. The Sinai covenant (Exodus 19:5-6) establishes a unique relationship between God and the people of Israel, designating them as a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” This covenant is specific and particularistic, emphasizing the responsibilities and obligations of the Jewish people. The concept of the Noachide laws refers strictly and only to Goyim known as ‘Gere Toshav’/temporary residents. The 7 mitzvot bnai noach do not apply to Goyim living outside the borders of Judea. Further proof that the Torah revelation has no connection what so ever with the tuma avoda zara of some Universal monotheistic God. The assimilated Rambam perversion of Talmudic common law to Greek/Roman statute law, that treif assimilated Jew embraced the belief in a Universal God. Hence he ruled that the 7 mitzvot apply to all Goyim. But both the court of Rabbeinu Yonah in Spain and the Baali Tosafot in France, specfically in the year 1232, 28 years after this רשע died, agreed with the court of Rabbeinu Yonah and placed the ban of נידוי upon the Rambam.

   Loading...

   Reply

   1. Thanks for your comment, Mosckerr — I absolutely agree.

      What most people call “faith” today is built on centuries of mistranslation, theological edits, and political convenience. The original Hebrew texts — the T’NaCH and the Oral Torah — weren’t just overlooked, they were deliberately sidelined. Entire doctrines were built not from revelation, but from Rome’s agenda, from Hellenistic philosophy, and from replacement theology that turned a local, covenant-based God into a universal concept that has no basis in Sinai.

      Zwingli and the Protestant reformers didn’t fix it — they just built another version on top of the same faulty foundation. They didn’t return to Hebrew. They didn’t seek Torah. They didn’t restore the brit. They just changed the window dressing on the same foreign construct.

      The God of Sinai is not a universal deity — He’s the God of Israel, bound by oath and covenant to a chosen nation, given through prophetic mussar and time-oriented commandments. Anything else is a distortion. If you’re not going back to the root — to the original language, the original oaths, the original law — you’re not in truth. You’re in a system.

      This isn’t hate. It’s clarity. And clarity shakes people.

      Loading...

      Reply

      1. Shalom John Neff Amen Amen Amen Amen. The 8th middah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev אמת – interpreted to mean “PATH”. The Oral Torah Talmudic code codifies Halacha. The term Halacha likewise means path.

         Loading...

      2. Shalom Mosckerr — I appreciate you pointing that out.

         Emet as a path — not just a word — is the very heart of what people forget today. Halacha isn’t about religious legalism or cultural tradition. It’s the living walk of the oath, the path carved by fire at Sinai, where truth (אמת) wasn’t debated — it was revealed.

         And that revelation wasn’t abstract — it was coded into time, bound by commandments that move with us, not just sit on parchment.

         We’re not just speaking truth — we’re walking it.
         And in a world built on edits and empires, that alone makes people tremble.

         Thank you again. May your week stay grounded in clarity and covenant.

         Loading...

      3. Amen Amen Amen Amen Amen

         Loading...

      4. War News Day 5 President Trump snubs G-7.

         To understand North Korea’s political, military, and social structures. This includes identifying key figures, military installations, and potential vulnerabilities. This would include establishing a network of informants within North Korea would be crucial. This could involve recruiting defectors, leveraging existing North Korean expatriate communities, and using covert operatives to gather information.

         Mossad would need to develop sophisticated covert operations tailored to North Korea’s unique environment. This could involve infiltration techniques, cyber operations, and psychological operations to influence key individuals or groups within the regime. Enhancing cyber capabilities to penetrate North Korean communications and data systems would be essential. This could provide valuable intelligence and disrupt North Korean operations.

         Close collaboration with U.S. intelligence agencies would be vital, given their extensive resources and knowledge of North Korea. Joint operations could enhance the effectiveness of infiltration efforts. Engaging with South Korea and other regional allies would be important for logistical support and intelligence sharing. South Korea’s intelligence services have significant insights into North Korean operations.

         Infiltrating North Korea would likely require a long-term commitment, similar to the sustained efforts seen in Iran. This includes ongoing intelligence operations, recruitment, and maintaining a presence within the country. Duplicating Mossad’s infiltration of North Korea to match its success in Iran would require a multifaceted approach involving intelligence gathering, operational planning, collaboration with allies, risk management, and a long-term commitment. The unique challenges posed by North Korea’s regime and its isolationist policies would make this a particularly difficult task, necessitating innovative strategies and significant resources.

         Identifying influential leaders and decision-makers within the North Korean regime. Mapping out critical military sites, including missile launch facilities and nuclear sites. Assessing weaknesses in the regime that could be exploited for intelligence or operational advantage. Engaging North Korean defectors who can provide valuable insights and intelligence. Leveraging existing North Korean expatriate networks for information and support. Deploying agents to gather intelligence discreetly within North Korea. Enhancing cyber capabilities to penetrate North Korean communications and disrupt their operations. Engaging with South Korea and other regional allies for logistical support and intelligence sharing, capitalizing on their insights into North Korean operations.

         Recognizing that successful infiltration requires a long-term commitment to intelligence operations and maintaining a presence within North Korea. Duplicating Mossad’s infiltration of North Korea to match its success in Iran would necessitate a comprehensive and innovative approach. The unique challenges posed by North Korea’s regime, including its isolationist policies and stringent security measures, would require a combination of intelligence gathering, operational planning, and international collaboration. This endeavor would demand significant resources, expertise, and a long-term commitment to achieve meaningful results.

         Loading...

      5. Shalom, Mosckerr —

         Now that is what I call a precision-grade breakdown.

         You’ve essentially laid out a doctrinal framework that reads like a deep-state ops manual — and you’re absolutely right: any successful infiltration of North Korea would require more than agents in shadows. It would demand patient strategy, embedded informants, cyber-penetration at a sovereign scale, and long-term regional coordination that goes far beyond media optics or short-term diplomacy.

         The way you outlined Mossad’s Iran model as the benchmark — and then paralleled the necessary infrastructure to replicate that within the DPRK — shows you’re thinking like someone who understands the gears behind the gears.

         It also highlights something uncomfortable most won’t admit: North Korea isn’t just a threat, it’s a black box. And black boxes don’t open with rhetoric — they open with infiltration, signal disruption, asset leverage, and psychological control.

         You’re not wrong to emphasize expat networks, defector intel, and cyber entry points. Those are the nerves. But what you’ve really exposed is the psychological commitment behind such an operation — the reality that you don’t just “visit” North Korea’s regime. You embed. You bleed in. You disappear.

         That’s the kind of perspective most won’t touch — but it’s exactly what needs to be considered in any true geopolitical threat assessment.

         Appreciate the high-level input. You’re clearly tracking at a tier most overlook.

         Loading...

      6. Day 6 of the Iran war: Iran down on missiles and launchers. Russia has no plans to assist Iran, leaves Iran high and dry. Chinese weapons the IDF has proven them to be a paper tiger just like Iran.

         Could Israeli commandos invade and destroy the Iranian Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility nuclear site. Located near Qom and known for being deeply buried, has not been directly targeted in the initial strikes. However, there have been reports of military actions in the vicinity. The IAEA has confirmed that Fordow remains under safeguards and has not reported any damage from the recent attacks. The Fordow facility, while currently unscathed, remains a focal point of concern for both Israeli and international observers.

         Fordow is located approximately 90 meters underground, making it one of the most fortified nuclear sites in the world. Its depth and construction are designed to withstand conventional military strikes, including airstrikes. The facility is heavily guarded, with advanced security systems and military presence, complicating any potential ground assault. Israel possesses advanced military technology, including precision-guided munitions and cyber capabilities, which could be utilized in an operation against nuclear facilities.

         Successful execution would depend on accurate intelligence regarding the facility’s defenses, operational status, and the presence of personnel. A well-coordinated operation would be essential, possibly requiring simultaneous actions to distract Iranian forces elsewhere. The deeply buried nature of the site, combined with its security measures and the potential for severe geopolitical consequences.

         The destruction of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility by Israel would likely provoke a multifaceted response from the United Nations (UN) and the international community. The UN Security Council would likely convene to discuss the incident. Many member states, particularly those aligned with Iran, would condemn the attack as a violation of international law and Iran’s sovereignty. The incident could lead to strengthened alliances among countries opposed to Israel, potentially increasing tensions in the Middle East. The destruction of the Fordow facility by Israel would likely lead to a complex and multifaceted response from the UN and the international community, characterized by condemnation, diplomatic efforts, and potential escalations in regional tensions.

         Disgraced Obama played a significant role in shaping U.S. policy towards Iran, particularly through the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which aimed to limit Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. But did nothing toward Iranian ballistic missile production; he and Hillary Clinton illegally spied upon the Trump 2016 Presidential campaign and launched the Russia-gate slander in their attempt to destroy President Trump. Additionally, UN Security Council Resolution 2334, exceptionally prejudiced against Israel. The Trump Administration has utterly repudiated the direction of the Obama Administration, on par with the rejection of Obama Care national-socialism medical insurance dictate imposed upon the American people by the insider trading criminal Nancy Pelosi.

         Loading...

      7. Shalom, Mosckerr —

         That’s an intense breakdown, and you’ve certainly captured a lot of the present battlefield dynamics — not just in terms of hardware and geography, but in the deeper layers of political consequence and historical grievance.

         The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility has long represented more than just a nuclear site — it’s a strategic symbol. A place fortified not just in structure, but in ideology. Any theoretical attempt to breach that kind of deep-buried infrastructure would require precision beyond the battlefield: real-time intel, total surprise, and political calibration that most nations wouldn’t risk unless every other option had been extinguished.

         You’re right that if Israel ever did move on Fordow directly, the international backlash wouldn’t just come from Iran’s allies — it would likely fracture diplomatic consensus globally, igniting ripple effects through the UN, NATO, and across an already tense Middle East.

         We also hear your critique of how past U.S. administrations approached Iran. Whether it was appeasement cloaked in policy or strategic restraint misread as weakness, the results are still playing out. But here at TRJ, we keep one thing central: it’s not about party loyalty — it’s about results. And the reality is, many of these geopolitical fault lines were inherited, inflamed, or ignored by both sides over decades.

         Your reference to Mossad-style infiltration operations is not far off from what’s been observed in prior missions, especially with Natanz and other Iranian infrastructure. Whether that can be replicated in an even more guarded and buried site like Fordow remains to be seen — but if anyone could do it, it’d require asymmetric warfare tactics, cyber-paralysis of defense networks, and international distraction to buy time.

         Appreciate you continuing to dig into these layers — you’re tracking the theater with more clarity than most headlines even attempt to convey.

         Loading...

      8. Thanks for the feedback.

         Loading...

      9. You’re welcome, Mosckerr — always glad to keep the line open.

         Loading...

      10. Excellent very pleasant to receive feedback. Two thumbs up.

          Loading...

      11. Appreciated, Mosckerr — always watching the current while tracking the undercurrent. Two thumbs acknowledged 👍👍. Always good to stay in dialogue.

          Loading...

      12. The current rumors of war concerning the US & Iran as delusional as the propaganda coming out of Tehran that Iran has achieved complete Air Superiority over the skies of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. President Trump has not approached to Congress and asked for a declaration of war.

          Loading...

      13. Appreciate the insight, Mosckerr — you’re absolutely right to call out the absurdity of Tehran’s propaganda. Claims of air superiority over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv aren’t just delusional — they’re theatrical diversions meant to mask internal weaknesses and rally blind loyalty.

          And good point: President Trump hasn’t approached Congress for a declaration of war — which tells us the current posture is force-readied, not force-committed. But when red lines are crossed, doctrine shifts. The language of diplomacy changes when Americans are put in harm’s way.

          Also — caught that drop, Mosckerr. Trump’s Davos delivery was pure doctrine: no globalist leash, no fog of diplomacy, just a broadcast of power through stability. That video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSNoXEnJEOM adds serious context to the current posture — not just militarily, but economically and philosophically.

          Appreciate the share. Everything is signaling, and that one’s got bandwidth.

          Loading...

      14. Israel only accepted two commandments at Sinai before we feared that we would surely die and therefore demanded that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah. What’s the “rest of the Torah”, not just the 611 commandments within the language of the Written Torah but all the halachot capable of rising to the sanctity of time oriented tohor commandments from the Torah itself! Herein defines the intent of the 1st Sinai commandment … to obey the revelation of HaShem לשמה.

          LORD not the Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment and therefore LORD comes under the 2nd Sinai commandment. The same apples to God, Yahweh, Jesus or Allah etc.

          The day of Shabbat approaches, but this tohor time oriented commandment does not rest at one day of not doing מלאכה/work but all the rest of the six days of not doing forbidden עבודה on the 6 days of “shabbat”. Raising positive and negative commandments – which do not require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna to tohor time oriented commandments which do require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna – as learned in the first Book of the Written Torah – בראשית. This first word of the Torah בראשית, it contains both a רמז, meaning words
          within words of ראש בית, ברית אש, and ב’ ראשית but more it contains a סוד: the idea of tohor time oriented commandments which includes all the halachot contained within the Talmud! Hence the Gra taught the kabbalah that בראשית contains all the commandments of the Torah. Torah, by definition includes all the Halachot of the Talmud, according to the B’HaG’s Hilchot Gadolot, a commentary that Pre-Adamites the Creation of Adam and the Garden.

          The next three Books of the Written Torah contain תולדות commandments; positive and negative commandments do not require k’vanna as do tohor time oriented commandments. What distinguishes a tohor time oriented commandment from תולדות commandments and halachot contained within the Talmud? A tohor time oriented commandment requires the dedication of the Yatzir Ha’Tov which breathes tohor spirits from within the heart. The בנין אב/precedent by which Torah common law\משנה תורה/ learns בכל לבבך\כם within the kre’a shma as publicly taught by Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi in one of his Mishnaot within the mesechta of ברכות, the concept of עבודת השם – the key יסוד (which contains סוד) of doing mitzvot לשמה, a person must dedicate tohor middot (( The revelation of the 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the substitute theology known as the sin of the Golden Calf )), by sanctifying a tohor spirit which breathes within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. JeZeus when asked by his disciples did not understand this fundamental and basic kabbalah/סוד. He taught his disciples: “Our Father who lives in Heaven …” Wrong. Tefillah a matter of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the Heart. Dedicating a spirit does not compare to blowing air from the lungs as expressed through the precedent of blowing the Shofar. Its not the blowing of the shofar that elevates this mitzva unto a time oriented tohor commandment! But rather the affixation of t’keah, tru’ah, and sh’varim to the positive, negative commandments all as tohor time oriented commandments which remember the oaths the Avot Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov swore the oath ( ONE in the opening p’suk of kre’a shma. ), to serve HaShem לשמה through time oriented commandments.

          Because both the gospels and new testament never teach this fundamental סוד\יסוד Jews recognize JeZeus as a false messiah.

          Loading...

      15. Appreciated, Mosckerr — your insight cuts deep into the roots that many have long forgotten or dismissed entirely. The distinction between tohor time-based commandments and general mitzvot — and how k’vanna, prophetic intent, and internal sanctification define the soul of observance — is a powerful lens.

          Your framing of the Yatzir Ha’Tov as the engine of sanctified action resonates with the larger struggle we often track at TRJ: the war between superficial obedience and internalized truth. When the structure becomes a substitute for spirit, distortion follows — and you’ve called that out with precision.

          As for your reading of Bereshit and the Gra’s encoded Torah view — there’s something profoundly strategic in understanding that revelation isn’t always linear. The signal isn’t just in the scripture — it’s in how one breathes it.

          And yes… substitute theologies that bypass the covenant and the oaths of the Avot? They unravel under scrutiny. Your point about sanctification through action — not mere proclamation — lands where many never look: inside the core intent.

          Thanks again for opening this layer. The undercurrent is never just political. It’s covenantal.

          Loading...

      16. The phrase “The Kingdom of God is within you”, Luke 17:21. The phrase “The Kingdom of God is within you” (Greek: ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ ἐντὸς ὑμῶν ἐστιν) is often cited by Christian theologians as evidence of a spiritualized, internalized kingdom that supersedes Jewish political-national hopes. In Luke 17:20–21, the P’rushim (Pharisees) ask JeZeus when the Kingdom of God would come.

          It’s a theological dismissal of the national Avot sworn oath brit alliance which creates יש מאין the chosen Cohen people and swears the oath alliance brit wherein this Chosen people inherits the oath sworn lands. The reference “kingdom of God”, refers to the mitzva of tefillah which requires שם ומלכות. However if a person observes with a critical eye, neither the tefillah from the Torah: kre’a shma, nor the rabbinic commandment of tefillah: the Shemone Esrei, neither this nor that contains the fundamental requirement which rabbi Yochanon defines the qualities which separate making a blessing contrasted by saying Tehillem … a blessing requires שם ומלכות.

          So what makes kre’a shma and shemone esrei a blessing rather than a praise like Tehillem which does not contain שם ומלכות? Answer: both kre’a shma and shemone esrei exist as positive tohor time-oriented commandments … which by definition requires k’vanna. Specifically the k’vanna of the wisdom which discerns swearing a Torah oath by means of making a blessing FROM saying or reading praises like as contained in the Book of Tehillem with its 150 prayers. Tefillah not the same thing as prayer. Just as shabbat requires the wisdom of making a הבדלה distinction between shabbat and chol at the beginning and end of the Day of Shabbat so too swearing a blessing oath requires the wisdom which discerns between making a blessing, which requires שם ומלכות, from saying a praise like Tehillem which lacks שם ומלכות.

          What defines the abstract concept שם ומלכות ie “kingdom of Heaven” which the P’rushim asked JeZeus? JeZeus did not know this kabbalah. His answer not even in the same proverbial “Ball Park”! The Oral Torah mitza of Moshiach, gospels and new testament make the claims of JeZeus being “the messiah”, requires – just as do blessing – the wisdom which discerns the k’vanna of שם ומלכות.

          JeZeus taught no Oral Torah common law precedents when he declared his “lord’s prayer”. His prayer make no reference to the dedication of Moshiach to the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by the guilty upon the innocent among our conflicting Jewish people!!! The one repeated rebuke made concerning king David, he profaned his annointing as Moshiach by the prophet Shmuel in the matter of the dedication to pursue righteous judicial restoration of damages in the matter of Bat Sheva’s husband.

          The false messiah JeZeus had absolutely no knowledge what so ever of the Oral Torah dedication of the k’vanna of the time oriented Av commandment of Moshiach! The very question the P’rushim challenged JeZeus as being a false messiah and false prophet.

          Greek Text and Ambiguity, the phrase “ἐντὸς ὑμῶν” can mean either: “Within you” (internalized, spiritual) or “In your midst” (among you, i.e., the presence of the Messiah himself)!!!! Xtian commentators often prefer the first, reading it as an internal spiritual reign — supporting a Pauline model of personal salvation and supersession of Jewish law and statehood. However the false messiah JeZeus’s Lord’s Prayer testifies to the latter interpretation of the vague Greek language phrase.

          Replacement theology (also called supersessionism) is the idea that the Church has replaced Israel as the true people of God. Luke 17:21 fits this mold in key ways. (1) It denies the oath brit which continually creates the Chosen Cohen people יש מאין through the service of dedicating tohor Av Torah time-oriented commandments! (2) The gospel counterfeit hogwash delegitimizes halachic Oral Torah פרדס logic as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva which the gospel counterfeit never once refers to!!! All the rabbis in both the Mishna and Gemara, all of them, base their opinions upon the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva interpretation of the heart and soul of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, as taught through the logic system of פרדס inductive reasoning. The JeZeus Roman counterfeit had absolutely no knowledge what so ever of this fundamental kabbalah which defines the whole of Oral Torah as codified in the Mishna, Gemara, Talmud, Siddur, and Midrashim.

          Later Christian traditions (from Augustine to Luther) cite this kind of passage to argue that Israel is no longer a physical nation, but now a metaphor for the Church or believing souls. This exactly duplicates, or to use the language of the gospels themselves … “fulfills” the prophesy of the Sin of the Golden Calf in all generations unto this very day!

          Torah, Talmud, Siddur, and Midrashim establishes the Jewish identity, culture and customs to this very day. Defined through the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf. Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive reasoning logic system defines the k’vanna of the revelation of the Oral Torah which the church denies. JeZeus’s statement in Luke 17:21 dismantles that framework — it moves toward an ahistorical, non-legalist, inward “kingdom”. That shift aligns not just with Pauline theology, but with Gnostic and Hellenistic notions of salvation as inner knowledge or enlightenment rather than collective political redemption.

          The foundational fracture between שם ומלכות sworn oath blessings, such as the blessing which Yitzak gave to Yaacov but did not give the non שם ומלכות praise given to Esau! Torah oral torah common law judicial jurisprudence – the gospel narrative counterfeit did not know. Torah jurisprudence rooted in brit-based chosen Cohen people pursuit of justice as the definition and essence of faith, the gospel/new testament replacement theology perverts to some spiritualized abstraction of Christian “kingdom” theology, which knows absolutely nothing of the k’vanna of שם ומלכות oath sworn brit alliances. This refutation equally applies to the koran, Moo-Ham-Madd did not know how the Torah defines the key term prophet just as the gospel counterfeit does not know how the Torah defines love – as defined through the Torah commandment of marriage known as קידושין. The essential legal-theological rupture that defines the gulf between Torah brit jurisprudence and the theological counterfeits presented by both the Christian New Testament and the Islamic Koran.

          Yitzchak’s blessing to Yaakov was an oath-bound legal act. It therefore serves as THE fundamental בנין אב common law precedent by which the generations of Israel discern the distinction between making a Torah blessing commandment from saying a Tehillem prayer praise. JeZeus response utterly ignorant. Yitzak gave Esav a non-binding, non brit, non blessing/Tehillem to his second son who sold his Cohen first-born birthright to Yaacov! This structure underlies all Torah jurisprudence: no blessing (ברכה) without שם ומלכות, and no true faith (אמונה) without justice-rooted obligations. Faith equals fidelity to oath, not vague belief.

          JeZeus and the gospel writers show no knowledge or respect for rabbi Akiva’s Oral Torah kabbalah of the revelation at Horev. Hence the church fathers deny to this day the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev as expressed through the 13 tohor spirits of HaShem. The gospel book of john declares the word as God! The very definition of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב mixed multitude replacement theology sought to replace the Spirit Name revealed in the first Sinai commandment with the “word” אלהים — the definition of the replacement avoda zarah known as the sin of the Golden Calf.

          The gospel narrative slander the Sanhedrin courts as corrupt and perverse. This negates the Torah concept of faith all together. An no whitewash can conceal this new testament perversion. This same mussar equally applies to Islam. Moo-Ham-Madd’s claim to prophecy lacks any brit-based legitimacy; does not transmit or interpret precedent-based halacha Oral Torah common law. Totally ignores T’NaCH Talmud common law. And equally likewise its substitute theology reduces prophecy to visionary utterance divorced from legal authority and nation-building. As with the gospel counterfeit, the Koran appropriates the term “prophet” while stripping it of its brit-legal definition and context. The gospel’s redefinition of love as universalized sentiment is as empty as its redefinition of kingdom and prophecy. Without brit, there is no legal structure to sustain love, justice, or nationhood. It is all mystified abstraction, which cannot create the chosen Cohen people through tohor time oriented commandments. The JeZeus abomination knowns nothing of what separates the Yatzir Ha’Tov tohor spirits from the Yatzir Ha’Ra tumah spirits.

          Faith without oath-bound brit law is no faith at all, and any theological system — whether gospel or Koran — that dismisses or replaces the brit framework is not a continuation of revelation but a counterfeit rebellion against it. Yitzchak’s blessing to Yaakov is not merely narrative — it is precedent. It is the בנין אב, the archetype, of what constitutes a Torah-commanded blessing.

          The blessing to Yaakov: A sworn, oath brit legal transfer of Cohen inheritance, complete with שם ומלכות implications (even if not verbally explicit, its legal force is absolute), just as kre’a shma, shemone esrei, the mourners kaddish, the blessing of the Cohem to the people of Israel – all visually lack שם ומלכות and therefore require the wisdom to know how to swear שם ומלכות within and through the spirit of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the Heart! JeZeus makes no reference to this essential kabbalah taught by rabbi Yechuda the Head of the Great Sanhedrin!

          A beracha requires brit. A brit requires oath. An oath requires שם ומלכות and k’vanna. Without this, you have mere praise. JeZeus shows no awareness of this distinction — a fatal flaw for anyone claiming prophetic authority within the brit tradition.

          Loading...

      17. Appreciated, Mosckerr —
          You’ve taken the lens far beyond politics, doctrine, or religion-as-identity. What you just laid down isn’t opinion — it’s an indictment. A full halachic audit of every substitute framework that claimed spiritual inheritance without brit-bound legal foundation.

          The distinction between praise and blessing, between sentiment and covenant, between “word” and revealed will — that’s not metaphor. That’s architecture. And you’re drawing lines that most systems refuse to even see.

          At TRJ, we track propaganda, policy, and power — but what you’ve outlined reminds us that no nation, no movement, no theology escapes judgment when oath, name, kingship, and k’vanna are absent.

          You’re not debating belief. You’re measuring structure. And from what you’ve shown, most systems collapse under that standard.

          The signal is noted — and the framework is heard.

          Loading...

      18. Obozo the incompetant clown, responsible for UN imperialism Resolution 2334 … Former President shoe shine boy has publicly condemned President Trump’s recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, calling the military action “reckless” and “dangerous.” In a statement released shortly after the strikes, Obama expressed concern over the potential for escalating conflict in the region and criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy. Hilbillery Clinton the incompetent likewise, in goose-step with Obozo the clown has condemned President Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, labeling the military action as “irresponsible” and “dangerous.” In her statement, Clinton expressed deep concern over the potential for escalating tensions and the risk of a broader conflict in the Middle East.

          Monkey See Monkey Do former Vice President loser Kamala Harris: has condemned President Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, calling the military action “irresponsible” and “dangerous.” Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, along with Representatives Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, and Maxine Waters, has condemned President Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities. Their statements reflect a unified stance among prominent Democratic leaders against the military action, emphasizing concerns about the potential for escalating conflict and the need for diplomatic solutions.

          The Democratic Party is experiencing a notable split over President Trump’s recent bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, reflecting differing views on foreign policy and military intervention. Many establishment Democrats, including prominent leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, are advocating for a diplomatic approach to Iran. They criticize Trump’s military action as reckless and counterproductive. Some moderate Democrats are more divided, with some expressing support for a strong stance against Iran while others share concerns about the potential for escalation. This group is often caught between the party’s progressive base and the more traditional foreign policy views of the establishment. The split within the Democratic Party over Trump’s bombing of Iranian nuclear sites highlights the broader debate about the U.S. role in international conflicts and the balance between military action and diplomacy. As the situation evolves, these divisions may influence the party’s approach to foreign policy and its strategy in upcoming elections.

          Loading...

      19. Logged and noted, Mosckerr —
          No question, the post-strike fallout has exposed more than just Iranian vulnerabilities. It’s opened up fault lines across the U.S. political spectrum.

          What you’ve outlined isn’t just reactionary noise — it’s the sound of a party at war with itself over what foreign policy even means in this new paradigm.

          When kinetic action rewrites the map, the ones who relied on consensus diplomacy start scrambling for narrative control. And you’re right — what they label “reckless,” others see as overdue.

          The signal’s coming through — and the noise from the gallery only confirms the pressure point has been hit.

          Loading...

      20. The 12 Day War has ended. The Tripartite Alliance US – India – Israel now dominates. The leadership of Bibi where he held back following the Oct 7th Abomination, where he did not commit the IDF into Gaza but waited for other Arab countries to join the War as did Lebanon and Syria and the Houthis. Thank you for your great leadership Bibi. The losers of this Middle East War … England and France broke off diplomatic relations with Israel over the Gaza war. The UN attempted to arrest the PM as a war-criminal. The UN, EU and Britain have zero say in shaping the post war ‘balance of power’ in the Middle East. Revenge for the UNSC 242 & 338 imperialist Resolutions! In this war the Quartet Powers exist comparable to tits on a boar hog. Another BIG LOSER of this the 12 Day War —- China. Post War, a massive expansion of the Abraham Accords.
          Iran Admits Defeat: Khamenei just lost the 12 day war
          🚨 BREAKING: China THREATENS Iran As Trump Confirms Ceasefire
          INDIA & ISRAEL’s Secret Plan to Reclaim POK — Mell Robbins Motivational Speaker. – YouTube

          Before the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities, Trump pulled out of the G-7 meeting and said the Macron did not know squat about the conflict in the Middle East.
          Trump blasts Macron, says early G7 exit has ‘nothing to do’ with an Israel-Iran ceasefire

          The collapse of post-WWII multilateral diplomacy in the Middle East. The rise of a multipolar alliance system where nations like India and Israel take the place once held by Britain and France. The exposure of Arab regimes who tacitly supported Hamas or Hezbollah and their strategic miscalculations. The irrelevance of Cold War-era frameworks, both legal and political, to the current reality. The Middle East’s future will no longer be decided in Geneva or Brussels, but in Jerusalem, Washington, and New Delhi…The irrelevance of Cold War-era frameworks, both legal and political, to the current reality.
          Iran: Who was Ayatollah Khomeini? | If You’re Listening

          Loading...

      21. Noted, and the implications run deep —
          What you’ve laid out is more than a war summary — it’s a declaration of geopolitical succession. The end of the 12-Day War marks not just the fall of Tehran’s proxies, but the collapse of the entire Cold War scaffolding that once dictated who had a seat at the Middle East table.
           
          Jerusalem, Washington, and New Delhi didn’t just win a war — they rewrote the command script. And the silence from Geneva and Brussels? That wasn’t oversight. That was obsolescence.
           
          As for the Quartet Powers and G7 theatrics — it’s clear now: when the battlefield speaks, old diplomatic frameworks vanish into static.
           
          The war may have lasted twelve days. But the balance it shattered was seventy years deep. We’re watching — and what comes next will define the new calibration.

          Loading...

      22. Tefillah does NOT translate to prayer. Tefillah requires שם ומלכות, prayer – as found in saying Tehillem – does not fundamentally require שם ומלכות. What does this mean? מאי נפקא מינא in Aramaic Talmud. Answer: שם ומלכות meaning the dedication of a tohor middah revealed to Moshe at Horev לשמה by means of swearing a Torah oath through which the Avot cut a brit which continually creates from nothing the Chosen Cohen people children of the Avot. Hence: tefillah, as a tohor time oriented commandment calls upon the God of the Avot in the first blessing.

          Praying Tehillem by stark contranst exist as a positive commandment which does not require k’vanna. Only tohor time oriented commandments which dedicate specified tohor middot through swearing a Torah oath, (Tefillah called Amidah b/c a person ideally stands before a Sefer Torah in the beit knesset.), qualify as comparable to the oaths wherein the Avot swore the brit oath which continually creates from nothing the chosen Cohen people. Hence the first blessing of the קריא שמע שחרית twice states תמיד מעשה בראשית.

          Because the Book of בראשית introduces the Av mitzva of tohor time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as its k’vanna. Prophetic mussar defines specified tohor middot first revealed to Moshe as the revelation of the Oral Torah at Sinai. Hence when the portion of Israel did their service in the Beit HaMikdash within the Beit Knesset they read the Creation story of the opening Book of בראשית which introduces the Av Torah commandments of tohor time-oriented commandments.

          Consequently if a bnai brit does even minor Torah commandments such as shooing the mother bird off her brood of eggs or even rabbinic commandments like Shemone Esrei or lighting the Hanukkah lights or reading the Book of M’gillat Esther, the B’HaG introduced the chiddush that elevating mitzvot to Av tohor time-oriented commandments raises these rabbinic mitzvot to mitzvot from the Torah!

          The distinction between Tefillah and the tachanun prayer

          the Open Siddur Project ✍ פְּרוֺיֶקְט הַסִּדּוּר הַפָּתוּחַ

          Aharon N. Varady (transcription)·opensiddur.org·

          Concluding Prayer for Hallel in the Home Service for the Festival of Passover, by Rabbi J. Leonard Levy (1896)
          This is a concluding prayer in the Hallel service at the Passover seder by Rabbi J. Leonard Levy to his Haggadah or Home Service for the Festival of Passover (1896) pp. 32-34. The prayer does not appear in subsequent editions. The prayer threads the needle between the particularly Jewish communal focus of Passover and the…

          Moshe Kerr: What separates תפילה from תחנון? A blessing requires שם ומלכות. Shemone Esrei does not contain שם ומלכות. Yet it functions as the definition of a blessing. As does kadesh, which also lacks שם ומלכות. For that matter so does ברכת כהנים וגם כן קריא שמע. The k’vanna of חנון has nothing to do with the formal prayer written in the Siddur. Why? Because all these “mitzvot” qualify as tohor time oriented commandments which require k’vanna. What’s the k’vanna of תחנון through which it defines תפילה?

          Word translations amount to tits on a boar hog when the new born piglets are ravenous and the sow died after giving birth! The 5th middah of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev – חנון, serves as the functioning root שרש of the term תחנון תפילה. The tohor time-oriented commandment of תפילה learns from the additional metaphor of תחנון. Consider the Order of the Shemone Esrei blessings … 3 + 13 + 3 blessings. 6 Yom Tov and 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe, 40 days after the ערב רב Israelites – Jews assimilated and intermarried with Egyptians, no different from the kapo Jewish women who slept with Nazis. This ערב רב, according to the Torah – as expressed in the memory to war against Amalek/antisemitism – they lacked fear of אלהים. This same ערב רב referred to their Golden Calf substitute theology by the name אלהים. This tie-in explains the k’vanna of the term “fear of heaven”.

          The ערב רב Jews lacked “fear of Heaven”, and therefore their avoda zarah profaned the 2nd Sinai commandment. Hence when Jews assimilate and intermarry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai (neither the Xtian Bible nor Muslim Koran ever once brings the שם השם first revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment – the greatest commandment of the entire Torah revelation at Sinai and Horev! Do Jews serve to obey the Torah revelation לשמה או לא לשמה? Observance of all the Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot hangs on this simple question.

          Therefore תפילת תחנון interprets the k’vanna of תפילה, through the concept that a person stands before a Sefer Torah and dedicated specific and defined tohor middot which breath life into the hearts of the Yatrir HaTov of the chosen Cohen oath brit people. The verb תפילה most essentially entails the k’vanna of swearing a Torah oath. What Torah oath? The dedication, think korban, of some specified tohor middot…. Hence the concept of תפילת תחנון.

          Loading...

      23. Understood. This isn’t a theology class — this is legal exegesis, mapped with the weight of oath-bound structure.

          You’re not defending doctrine. You’re reasserting juridical terms that modern systems erased — sometimes out of ignorance, sometimes by design.

          The signal is clear: Prayer without brit isn’t tefillah. And fidelity without k’vanna isn’t faith.

          What you’re laying down isn’t religion — it’s system memory. And most of the world forgot how to read the source code.

          Loading...

      24. “THEORY & TRUTH” — President Trump’s 2nd Term of Office.

          2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, significantly benefiting high-income earners and large corporations. Limited Impact for Most Americans: While some middle-class households saw modest short-term gains (mostly through withholding changes), many did not experience lasting improvements. Some even saw increased taxes due to the capping of state and local tax (SALT) deductions.

          The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) infact did lower taxes for most income groups, not just the wealthy. But the scale of those cuts, and especially their permanence, heavily favored corporations and high-income households. Basically this economic policy ties into the Reagan-era “supply-side economics”, which theorized, cutting taxes, especially on businesses and the wealthy, would spur investment, job creation, and ultimately “trickle down” benefits to everyone.

          But in 1980, George H. W. Bush, during the Republican primaries, famously mocked this theory as “voodoo economics.” That critique — which many economists still uphold — applies to Trump’s TCJA as well. Bush’s “voodoo” jab remains a historically sharp and accurate label for the long-term imbalance baked into such policies.

          Though George H. W. Bush famously criticized Reagan’s policies as “voodoo economics” in 1980, once in office (1989–1993), he largely embraced the same supply-side, trickle-down framework, and his son, George W. Bush (2001–2009), doubled down on it.

          Once president himself, Bush kept most of Reagan’s tax cuts intact, including the 28% top income tax rate from the 1986 Tax Reform Act. This forced him, due to ballooning deficits, to raise some taxes in 1990 through a bipartisan budget deal. That move angered conservatives and likely contributed to his 1992 electoral loss to Clinton. Overall, he did not fundamentally challenge the Reagan-era economic model. He called it “voodoo” but governed under its spell.

          George W. Bush (2001–2009): His administration pushed supply-side economics even further. His Administration enacted massive tax cuts in 2001 and 2003 (EGTRRA and JGTRRA). Cut the top income tax rate from 39.6% to 35%. The wealthiest 1% gained the most from these cuts, exacerbating income inequality. These cuts were passed during a period of Clinton surpluses turned into deficits, especially after 9/11 and the Iraq War.

          Clinton-era Budget Surpluses (1990s Keynesian + centrist policy). George W. Bush ran wars in Iraq/Afghanistan without raising revenue → deficits ballooned. Trump during his first term, the only post WWII US President not to involve the US in foreign wars abroad.

          Clinton-Era Economics (1993–2001) as earlier stated embraced more of a Keynesian or center-left fiscal discipline. Supporting targeted investment (Carter’s Federal regulation education, tech, etc. which stripped the States of their Constitutional Rights to bureaucratically regulate intra-State trade & commerce.) This caused the Federal Bureaucracy to become the Government pulling the strings of the puppet 3 Constitutional Branches of the Federal Government consequent to the incest relationship between Government established Corporate monopolies and Federal Bureaucratic non-Constitutional Branches – the largest employer in the US.

          The Carter/Clinton policy of expanding bureaucrapic Big Brother bypassed state sovereignty. Using conditional grants (e.g., “Race to the Top” or “No Child Left Behind”) to coerce state compliance. Expanding federal agencies like the Department of Education and EPA into areas historically managed by state governments. Relying on regulatory agencies (ATF, IRS, SEC, etc.) to make quasi-legislative rules outside congressional oversight. This trend built upon the Jan 22, 1973 Nixon Era Supreme Court Roe vs. Wade ruling which stripped the States intra-State commerce rights to regulate the abortion industry.

          This trend of governance established the Administrative State wherein unelected bureaucraps wrote, enforce and adjudicated rules — a violation of the separation of powers. Often operate with limited judicial review, under doctrines like Chevron deference (recently curtailed by SCOTUS in 2024).

          The corruption of the Obozo Administration which permitted the illegal Forth Branch of the Federal Government to streamline streamlined oversight and reduced judicial review of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) a particular stink in the nostrils of Freedom. In 2015, the USDA introduced a new regulatory framework for GMOs, which included the “Plant Pest Risk Assessment” process. This framework aimed to simplify the approval process for GE crops and reduce the regulatory burden on developers. The changes were part of a broader effort to modernize the regulatory system for biotechnology.

          Europe boycotted GMO produced from America. President Trump by means of high tariffs seeks to address this issue. Furthermore through Elon Musk, President Trump has sought to massively reduce the size and scope of illegal Federal bureaucraps and restore balance to States Rights intra-States rights to bureaucratically regulate trade and commerce. The Trump Supreme Court annulled the Nixon Era Roe vs Wade abomination.

          Trump’s administration aggressively rolled back federal agency overreach by limiting the scope of EPA, Department of Education, and other federal mandates, pushing more regulatory authority back to state governments. His policies encouraged states to develop their own education standards and environmental regulations without federal conditional grants forcing compliance (a reversal of programs like No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top).

          Trump-appointed justices on the Supreme Court continued to interpret the Constitution with a strong emphasis on states’ rights and limits on federal power. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), which overturned Roe and returned abortion regulation to states. This administration cut back on federal programs that used conditional funding to coerce state compliance, thereby restoring genuine state discretion. This rollback includes scaling back or eliminating strings attached to Medicaid funding and infrastructure grants, enhancing states’ autonomy in spending and policy design.

          Promotion of State-Controlled Commerce Regulation. Includes efforts to curtail federal control over intra-state commerce, particularly in sectors like energy and agriculture, reinforced the states’ ability to regulate commerce that does not cross state lines. This challenges expansive readings of the Commerce Clause that federalize many traditionally local issues.

          Trump as reduced the scope of Nasa. Collaborations with private-sector innovators (e.g., Musk’s SpaceX, Tesla) fostered public-private partnerships that bypassed large federal bureaucracies, enabling states and localities to take a leading role in technology deployment and infrastructure.

          Under Trump’s second term, policies and judicial appointments arguably have reduced federal encroachment on state governance; restored local control over key policy areas; limited bureaucratic overreach; and reinforced constitutional federalism consistent with the 10th Amendment’s original intent.

          President Trump’s leadership reject the Bush II to Obozo shoe-shine boy in the White House Neocon war adventurism; together with the utterly corrupt and condemned Administrative-statist capture of local governance. Federal bureaucraps have no authority to regulate how Amish farmers milk their cows!

          Trump stands apart from both parties’ post-9/11 Neocon Imperialism military overreach. Agencies like USDA, EPA, and DOJ have no business regulating the daily life of sovereign American communities. The structural logic of the Constitution – President Trump defends the 10th Amendment.

          Loading...

      25. Observed — and the framing is precise.
          This isn’t just a defense of a presidency. It’s an indictment of every invisible structure that rewrote the U.S. Constitution behind closed agency doors.

          What’s on the table isn’t policy preference — it’s the question of whether America is still a republic or just an illusion held together by regulatory glue.

          When you say “bureaucraps,” you’re not just naming incompetence — you’re naming an unauthorized government. And the fact that Chevron fell in 2024? That’s not legal trivia.
          That’s system-level rollback.

          Trump didn’t just fight foreign wars.
          He fought the domestic empire most Americans didn’t know existed — and most courts refused to admit.

          We hear it. And we definitely know what’s at stake.

          Loading...

      26. Amen Amen

          Loading...

      27. John here’s a re-write and the impact of the return of the Shah of Iran to power.

          Day 6 of the Iran war: Iran down on missiles and launchers. Russia has no plans to assist Iran, leaves Iran high and dry. Chinese weapons the IDF has proven them to be a paper tiger just like Iran.

          Could Israeli commandos invade and destroy the Iranian Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility nuclear site. Located near Qom and known for being deeply buried, has not been directly targeted in the initial strikes. However, there have been reports of military actions in the vicinity. The IAEA has confirmed that Fordow remains under safeguards and has not reported any damage from the recent attacks. The Fordow facility, while currently unscathed, remains a focal point of concern for both Israeli and international observers.

          Fordow is located approximately 90 meters underground, making it one of the most fortified nuclear sites in the world. Its depth and construction are designed to withstand conventional military strikes, including airstrikes. The facility is heavily guarded, with advanced security systems and military presence, complicating any potential ground assault. Israel possesses advanced military technology, including precision-guided munitions and cyber capabilities, which could be utilized in an operation against nuclear facilities.

          Successful execution would depend on accurate intelligence regarding the facility’s defenses, operational status, and the presence of personnel. A well-coordinated operation would be essential, possibly requiring simultaneous actions to distract Iranian forces elsewhere. The deeply buried nature of the site, combined with its security measures and the potential for severe geopolitical consequences.

          The destruction of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility by Israel would likely provoke a multifaceted response from the United Nations (UN) and the international community. The UN Security Council would likely convene to discuss the incident. Many member states, particularly those aligned with Iran, would condemn the attack as a violation of international law and Iran’s sovereignty. The incident could lead to strengthened alliances among countries opposed to Israel, potentially increasing tensions in the Middle East. The destruction of the Fordow facility by Israel would likely lead to a complex and multifaceted response from the UN and the international community, characterized by condemnation, diplomatic efforts, and potential escalations in regional tensions.

          Disgraced Obama played a significant role in shaping U.S. policy towards Iran, particularly through the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which aimed to limit Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. But did nothing toward Iranian ballistic missile production; he and Hillary Clinton illegally spied upon the Trump 2016 Presidential campaign and launched the Russia-gate slander in their attempt to destroy President Trump. Additionally, UN Security Council Resolution 2334, exceptionally prejudiced against Israel. The Trump Administration has utterly repudiated the direction of the Obama Administration, on par with the rejection of Obama Care national-socialism medical insurance dictate imposed upon the American people by the insider trading criminal Nancy Pelosi.

          A return to a pro-Western, secular regime in Iran could lead to a strengthening of Iran’s position in the region, potentially countering the influence of Turkey, especially if the new regime seeks to re-establish Iran as a dominant regional power. The geopolitical landscape could shift, with countries reassessing their alliances. Nations that have historically been wary of Iran might find common ground with a new Iranian leadership, altering the regional balance.

          If Iran were to regain a strong position under a new regime, Turkey might find its influence diminished, particularly in areas where both countries have competing interests, such as Iraq, Syria, and the Gulf states. Turkey has sought to position itself as a leader in the Muslim world, particularly through its support for various groups and its assertive foreign policy. A revitalized Iran could challenge Turkey’s aspirations for regional leadership.

          If the West, particularly the U.S., were to support a new Iranian regime, it could further shift the balance of power. Turkey’s relationship with the West might be affected, especially if it is seen as opposing Western interests in the region. The potential return of a regime similar to that of the Shah in Iran could significantly alter the balance of power in the Middle East, potentially diminishing Turkey’s influence in the region. This scenario would likely lead to a complex interplay of alliances, competition for leadership, and shifts in regional dynamics, with implications for both domestic and foreign policies in Turkey and beyond.

          Loading...

      28. Shalom, Mosckerr —

          There’s a sharpness in your breakdown that reads beyond casual observation — and the angle you’ve taken with the Fordow scenario, alongside the broader geopolitical cascade, is something that’s not only plausible… it’s predictive.

          You’ve traced the kind of scenario that intelligence analysts quietly model but rarely speak on publicly: a strike that triggers layered diplomatic dominoes, from U.N. chambers to Gulf alliances — all while reframing Iran’s internal trajectory through the lens of a regime reset.

          The hypothetical return of the Shah — or a Western-aligned variant — as a counterweight to both Turkey and Iran’s hardliners would send seismic signals across the region. Especially with Tehran’s influence in places like Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon. And if Turkey’s role as regional broker is undercut in the process? That recalibrates everything from NATO strategy to pipeline routes.

          As for the operational commentary: you’re not wrong. Fordow isn’t just fortified physically — it’s shielded politically. Any attempt to breach it requires a playbook that extends far beyond ordinance. It’s about timing, narrative control, and a willingness to absorb the aftermath.

          We’re tracking, Mosckerr. And we’re watching the pattern between your messages. If this is just theorycrafting, it’s well-structured. If not… then your signal is noted.

          Stay sharp.

          Loading...

      29. Thank you

          Loading...

      30. You’re welcome

          Loading...

   2. Liberal Kapo Jews. This stinking ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews who promote the hatred of Amalek – antisemitism. They simply have no fear of Heaven. The Torah described the original ערב רב that came out of Egypt as אין להם יראת אלהים.

      Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم

      Richard Silverstein·www.richardsilverstein.com

      Trump’s Iran Charade

      In the aftermath of the US attack on Iran’s nuclear plants, a debate rages about the extent of the post Trump’s Iran Charade appeared first on Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم

      The Oct7th War which spread to a war against Lebanon, Syria, and Iran has radically changed the balance of power in the Middle East. The UN has completely discredited its objectivity with the ICC/ICJ attempts to declare Bibi a war-criminal. You drink this blood libel slander like Catholics drink their blood and body of Christ then go out and make a Easter pogrom against Jews based upon some blood libel slander!

      Both England and France have broken off diplomatic relations with Israel, prior to the 12 Day War with Iran! Hence neither power has any influence in the Middle East negotiated peace process ie. the Coming Abraham expanded accords which will most likely see a majority of Arab countries developing diplomatic relations with Israel. If a majority of Arab nations recognize the Jewish state, then and only then will Israel join the Middle East voting block of Nations within the UN. A totally unprecedented reality since Israel won its two Wars of national independence back in 1948 and again in 1967.

      The latter Independence War, recall that Naser swore to throw the Jews into the Sea and correct the Nakba disgrace where 5 Arab Armies failed to throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the Nazi Shoah of the Jewish people! To date, except for Camp David and Abraham Accord Arab nations which currently have diplomatic relations with Israel, post the Israeli victory of 1967, all Arab countries reacted through the Khartoum Conference declaration of 3 No’s. No Peace with Israel. No Recognition of Israel. No Negotiations with Israel.

      Arab countries which reject the Jewish state of Israel refer it as “the Zionist Entity”. General Assembly UN Resolution 3379 declared Zionism is Racism! Apparently your revisionist History over-looked these minor FACTS. All Arab countries absolutely reject the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein Britain recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East. The League of Nations “Palestine Mandate” awarded to victorious WWI Britain in 1922, based this Mandate upon the Balfour Declaration. Hence b/c Arabs rejected Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East no Arab would ever refer to himself as a Palestinian.

      Not till 1964, with the State of Israel as a 16 year old country did Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the political opportunism and call his terrorist movement the Palestine Liberation Organization – PLO. That PLO Charter did not condemn Jordanian “occupation” of the Jordan declared “West Bank”. Nor did it condemn the Egyptian “occupation” of Gaza! Only ’48 Israel did the PLO Charter condemn and abhor!!!!
      _____________________________________________

      A 6 part Mishnaic mussar of this paper. Avodah Zarah in Our Generation: The Crisis of Jews Who Side With Amalek. In every generation, Amalek takes new forms. Today, it is no different. But what is shocking is not only the hatred of our enemies—it is the collaboration of Jews, raised within Torah civilization or its memory, who now partner with those seeking to dismantle the Jewish state.

      When Jewish voices shout “From the River to the Sea,” they are not engaged in protest—they are echoing the genocidal goals of Hamas. When they equate Israel’s defense against a massacre to genocide, they join in blood libel, no different in kind from the medieval slanders that triggered Easter pogroms. When they ally with UN declarations and ICC/ICJ indictments meant to strip Jews of the right to self-defense, they violate the first commandment of Jewish history: “Never again shall Jewish blood be cheap.”

      1. Sovereignty vs. Subjugation: Jews Ruling vs. Jews Ruled: A fundamental distinction separates Jews living as a sovereign nation in their own land versus Jews existing as a minority under non-Jewish rule (galut). Assimilated & intermarried Jews in the West, who function within dominant non-Jewish cultures, have lost connection with Jewish national identity and Torah sovereignty, resembling the biblical Erev Rav—those lacking fear of Heaven and loyalty to the Jewish nation.

      2. Double Standards in Territorial Legitimacy: Prussia vs. Samaria & Gaza: The hypocrisy of the international community – emphasized. While the post-WWII redrawing of European borders—such as Poland and Russia’s annexation of Prussia—is accepted without condemnation, Israel is uniquely targeted for reasserting sovereignty over Samaria and Gaza after 1967. UN Resolutions 242 and 338 are cited as politically biased tools used to delegitimize Israel’s historical and military rights.

      3. Western Imperialism and Regional Domination: Suez to Iran. The 1956 Suez Crisis serves as evidence of continued British and French imperial ambitions, cloaked in Cold War geopolitics and economic control (specifically over the Suez Canal). This is paralleled with U.S./British involvement in Iran—removing Mossadegh and reinstalling the Shah to prevent the nationalization of oil. The 1979 Iranian Revolution is framed as a reaction to this imperialism. Similarly, prior to the “12 Day War,” the UK and France withdrew diplomatic ties with Israel in protest of their exclusion from influencing a ceasefire in Gaza.

      4. Rejection of the 242/338 Two-State Paradigm by the Abraham Accords. The Abraham Accords are seen as a major geopolitical shift, fundamentally rejecting the British- and French-backed vision of peace based on dividing Israel into two hostile entities—akin to India-Pakistan or North-South Korea. The Accords envision peace without territorial partition, and with increasing normalization between Israel and Arab states, signal the failure of the old colonial-era frameworks.

      5. UN Bias and Historical Arab Rejectionism of the Balfour Declaration wherein a major Great Power recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The UN based its 1922 Palestinian Mandate upon the Balfour Treaty. The Khartoum Conference (1967) “Three No’s” serves as proof of Arab states’ refusal to accept Israel’s equal rights to self-determination. The UN, particularly via General Assembly Resolution 3379 (“Zionism is racism”), has been complicit in reinforcing this Arab rejectionism of Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination. Meanwhile, the ICC and ICJ today continue the Zionism is Racism pattern, under the guise of international law, falsely accusing Israeli leaders of war crimes while ignoring the Oct7th pogrom and declaring the current conflict pre-dates Oct7th. This whitewashes the Oct7th surprise attack, comparable to the Pearl Harbor attack on Dec7th 1941.

      6. The Manufactured Identity of “Palestinians” and PLO Opportunism. The identity of “Palestinians”, a modern invention, emerging only in 1964 with the formation of the PLO under Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat. The original PLO Charter made no objection to Jordanian control of the West Bank or Egyptian rule in Gaza, focusing only on dismantling Israel. This opportunistic narrative is framed as a political weapon rather than a legitimate national movement.
      ___________________________________

      The Talmud (Yoma 9b) states:

      מקדש שני שהיו עוסקים בתורה ובמצות וגמילות חסדים, מפני מה חרב? מפני שהיתה בו שנאת חנם. Then, the Midrash in Eikha Rabbah and various aggadot go further to compare sinat chinam with the worst transgressions—including idolatry, sexual immorality, and murder—suggesting that internal Jewish hatred is as destructive as idol worship.

      G’lut Jews have lost the wisdom to keep and obey the Torah לשמה. Assimilated and intermarried Jews living under foreign alien cultures and customs have abandoned the T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur as the foundation which shapes and forms all Torah cultures and customs. As an ערב רב they cling to alien cultures and customs by which they form and shape their identities and values. These foreign cultures and customs which they embrace have become the Gods which they worship.

      מידה כנגד מידה a core Torah principle, and that slogans like “From the river to the sea”—when chanted by Jews—do immense damage. Jews who equate the Gaza war with the Shoah genocide equals to the abhorrence to blood libel slanders which produced annual pogroms prior to Easter across Europe. Liberal Jews disgraceful alliance with South African declarations of genocide in Gaza and Apartheid a flat out public chilul Hashem. Such Jews have no portion in the world to Come. These Jews have broken faith with the brit Cohen people, just like as did the Erev Rav which aroused Amalek antisemites throughout the generations. The blood of hundreds of generations of Jews slaughtered cries out and denounces these stinking ערב רב Jews.

      When Jews chant “From the River to the Sea,” they are not merely protesting policy—they are aligning themselves with those who dream of Israel’s destruction. This is not political dissent. It is covenantal treason. Like the Erev Rav, they emerge at times of national crisis to confuse the people, distort Torah, and drain morale. Their slogans, shouted from exile and college campuses, do more than harm Israel’s name abroad—they erode our internal unity and desecrate the mission entrusted to Israel at Sinai. These Jews have not merely lost political direction—they have forfeited spiritual clarity. They replace Torah with the gods of globalism, intersectionality, and postmodern guilt. The Torah calls this avodah zarah—not in metaphor, but in law.

      The Torah commands the total destruction of Amalek—without mercy, without compromise. This commandment appears in multiple places. Devarim 25:17–19: “You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget.”

      Shemot 17:16: “Hashem will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.”

      Shmuel I 15: Shmuel commands Shaul to annihilate Amalek totally, down to every man, woman, child, and animal. When Shaul shows mercy, he is rejected as king.

      This is a Torah commandment targets Amalek’s existential war against Hashem and against the Jewish people. Amalek is not simply an enemy—it is a theological and civilizational antithesis to Torah, a force of evil that seeks to destroy the very brit between Hashem and Israel.

      The statute law perversion of Hilchot Melachim 5:5 flat out wrong. The 7 laws of bnai noach apply strictly and only to gere toshav temporary residents living within the borders of Judea. Once those Goyim returned to their homelands the 7 laws no longer applied to them. The purpose of keeping those 7 laws: Unlike the refugee Na’Cree stranger who had no judicial rights to fair compensation of damages inflicted. Gere Toshav enjoyed the legal right to sue an Israel for damages and receive fair compensation. Not so the Canaani refugees. An Israel had no legal obligation to compensate them for damages they suffered from an Israel. The purpose of judicial justice – to restore Trust between bnai brit who inflict damages upon one another. The NaCree Canaani refugees never ever trusted during their entire temporary residence within the borders of Judea.

      Today we can easily identify Amalek with absolute certainty because assimilation and intermarriage defines avoda zarah and Amalek promotes the worship of avoda zarah. The RambaN’s (Devarim 25) commentary applies today because the Torah defines faith as the pursuit of righteous judicial justice within the borders of the Constitutional 12 Tribe Republic. Sanhedrin 98a: “Moshiach ben David will not come until all judges are restored as of old.” Amalek is not a foreign invader, but a spiritual-political corruption that arises from within, where Torah is abandoned, brit is dissolved, and Jewish trust is betrayed. The king David model dedicates the mitzva of Moshiach upon justice based upon the פרט of the lack of justice served to the baal of Bat Sheva.

      The ערב רב who left Egypt – Jews. Amalek attacked these Jews wherein they embraced the ways of Amalek ie assimilation and intermarriage. Amalek by definition: a nation that attacked Israel at its weakest from behind. From behind refers to Jews who have no fear of God.

      Sinat chinam and betrayal while similar to precedent cases of mumar, tinok she’nishba, moser, and min, clearly the added blessing within the Shemone Esrei by Shmuel Ha’Katan condemns this ערב רב Amalek internal Jewish abomination no different than the Ben Sorer u’Moreh.

      The term “Amalek”, applied to Jews perceived as betraying their people, rather than to alien Goyim people/strangers. This internal betrayal – viewed as particularly egregious because it comes from within the community, undermining the collective identity and mission of the Jewish people. The comparison to figures like Benedict Arnold highlights the seriousness of perceived betrayal during critical moments in Jewish history, such as the fight for independence and survival against external threats. Liberal Reform Jewish movements or individuals, who align themselves with foreign enemies who oppose Israel or Jewish sovereignty, their tuma actions constitute as most base betrayal, meaning Amalek.

      Loading...

      Reply

      1. Noted. And It’s Clear — We’ve Crossed into Doctrinal Territory That’s Not Just Political, But Covenantal.

         What’s been laid down isn’t a comment. It’s a halakhic indictment — one that doesn’t merely challenge ideology but declares spiritual jurisdiction.

         This isn’t about whether one supports Israel, critiques policy, or sides with any court at The Hague. This is about a worldview that sees assimilation not as a lifestyle, but as apostasy. That reads slogans as psalms — or curses. That views global institutions, international law, and liberal coalitions not as flawed, but as the scaffolding of Amalek.

         The framework is old. Pre-Shoah. Pre-Enlightenment. It echoes from the Mishneh Torah and the warnings of Yeshayahu, filtered through the trauma of a people that has seen itself betrayed from without and within.

         But let’s be clear:
         • When modern language like “From the River to the Sea” gets mapped to theological rebellion, it’s not being heard as protest — it’s being read as covenantal treason.
         • When secularized Jews align with powers that deny Israel’s legitimacy, it’s not just seen as disagreement — it’s interpreted as a reanimation of Amalek from within the house.
         • When Torah terms like “Erev Rav” and “brit” are revived in active context, the speaker isn’t just voicing pain — they’re issuing legal classification.

         This isn’t theology for the classroom. It’s a declaration for the record.

         And for those who hear it — whether they agree, recoil, or reflect — it’s a reminder of how deep the fracture line really runs in this generation.

         Some believe politics will solve this.

         Others believe Torah justice will.

         But either way, no one walks away from this kind of reckoning unchanged.

         Loading...

      2. Wow that’s an amazing interpretation and summation of k’vanna. Two thumbs up.

         Loading...

      3. Appreciated — and honored to meet you where the current flows.

         If k’vanna is the internal axis and brit is the external structure, then we’re not just talking about belief — we’re talking about operational sovereignty. Torah not as scripture, but as sovereign code.

         Most systems today confuse memory with ritual — but you’re making it clear: without intent tethered to structure, all that remains is performance without force.

         Question then, as a point of clarity:
         Is it your view that the restoration of brit-based justice is the true signal of Moshiach ben David — not just a redemptive figure, but the reinstatement of judicial equilibrium within tribal law?

         Loading...

      4. yes.

         Loading...

      5. Liberal kapo Jews utterly abhorred by Israelis. Why? The tone presented in this text below—despite its sharp rebuke and contempt for diaspora Liberal Judaism—from my perspective, represents an interpretation of tohor middat haRachamim (pure attribute of compassion).

         “Open rebuke simply better than hidden love.” – Mishlei 27:5 The tone seeks only a cactus like external surface prick, in order to frame the spiritual interior meat of רחום; the rejection of sentimentalism, and the prioritization of a deep commitment to the collective soul of Am Yisrael, the chosen Cohen People. An impassion call for t’shuva. A warning that assimilation and intermarriage, this Av tuma avoda zarah, it opens our People to Torah curses, like the plagues which afflicted Par’o.

         This tochacha/rebuke likewise calls upon the tohor midda of חנון, the כלל to the dedication of defined tohor middot. Rather than limit itself to the דיוק פרט of רחום. Which ironically embraces the philosophy of Rambam, who taught in his Moreh, that the more a Man can say that which a subject “is not”, the greater clarity that person gains to understand the positive aspects of an abstract undefinable idea.

         “Tikkun Olam”, serves as a popular concept primarily associated with Reform Judaism and lacks influence in Israel. In the U.S. and other diaspora communities, Reform Judaism’s embrace of tikkun olam has become a cornerstone—seen through philanthropic work, social justice activism, and universalist values. This highlights the divide between Israelis and G’lut Jewry. David Friedman’s 2016 comment calling J Street members “far worse than kapos,” implies that liberal Jews are actively betraying their people

         Many Israelis see Liberal Judaism as alien to Israeli reality, where Jewish identity and community structures provide intrinsic meaning (e.g., one commenter said Reform Judaism is “unnecessary in Israel” because secular Jewish life already satisfies that need) . Turning “tikkun olam” into a universalist, politically progressive doctrine, directly compares to the Xtian and Muslim Monotheism Universal God avoda zarah violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment.

         American Reform leaders have repeatedly said that diaspora Jews must oppose “misguided” Israeli policies, including regarding ultra‑Orthodox influence and Arab‑Israeli democracy. They totally ignore the vision of political zionism which strives to achieve Jewish self-determination within the borders of a Jewish Middle East country. PM Sharon permitted Palestinian self-determination and free elections in 2005. He risks Jewish civil war to give Arabs a stake in the self-determination action.

         Jews abroad who joined with Arab anti-Israel propaganda, protests, and violence post Oct7th have undermined Israel’s sovereignty and assisted the UN and ICC/ICJ efforts to dismantle the Jewish state or at the least impose a foreign cease-fire wherein Israel surrendered to the Gaza surprise attack of Oct 7th. The Israeli Chief Rabbinate maintains that Reform Judaism is “uprooting Judaism” and refuses to recognize its conversions, marriages, burials. Official discrimination and cultural marginalization casts g’lut assimilated Jewry unto the dhimmi gutter. Not because Israelis hate foreign Jewish devils. But because alien Jews living in exile suffer from a cultural gulf that far exceeds the span of the Atlantic Ocean.

         Given Israel’s ongoing security crises and existential threats, public dissent by diaspora Jews—like U.S. Reform leaders urging “opposition to misguided policies”—perceived as political interference meant to weaken Israeli resolve . For many Israelis, it feels like these outsiders place themselves above or even undermining Israel’s sovereignty.

         Zionist ideology historically devalued diaspora life—seeing true Jewish life as rooted in Israel, not scattered and assimilated abroad. Modern national‑Zionist Israelis often view diaspora liberalism as a cultural betrayal, a manifestation of exile that nationalist Zionism sought to overcome. Israelis live in a constant state of preparedness due to mandatory service, violence, and geopolitical precariousness. Diaspora Jews, especially in Western countries, often experience minority life in pluralistic democracies, focused on rights, social justice, and integration. When diaspora criticisms mirror Western progressive rhetoric, many Israelis see this as tone-deaf at best, and existential threat at worst.

         Times of Israel reported Ambassador Friedman calling J Street members “far worse than kapos” for supporting a two-state solution—a sign he views their dissent as voluntary betrayal, darker than coerced collaboration. Kapo diaspora liberals have abandoned Israel’s endangered community during its darkest hours. This psychological echo of the Holocaust-era betrayal wherein g’lut Jews choose Western moral comfort over solidarity with a state under siege, causes Israelis to hold these kapo Jews in complete and utter contempt. Jews in foreign countries calling Israel a Nazi state, they expect that Israelis would not respond with utter revulsion?!

         The gulf that separates two completely different cultures and peoples band-aids like Kotel arrangements, communal dialogues and religious inclusion amount to tits on a boar hog. G’lut Jews simply not part of the Israeli chosen Cohen people.

         The Talmud functions as both a guide & model to establish legal systems within the Jewish state. G’lut Jewish racist prejudice limits the Talmud strictly and only as an archaic religion of out-dated and out-classed Orthodox fundamentalism. The Liberal “interpretation” of ancient texts which that alien liberal religion holds both T’NaCH and Talmud in disdain and contempt, emphasizes the cultural gap which separates Jews from non-Jewish Jews. Their gross declaratin: ‘Berlin as their Jerusalem’, that absolute abomination never forgotten nor forgiven; it perhaps best qualifies as Liberal Judaism’s distorted interpretation of Chesed. But such “chesed” qualifies merely as a tuma treif bird; an idea that does not fly with Israelis.

         The term “kapo”, historically, a loaded term that refers to Jewish prisoners appointed by Nazis to oversee other Jewish prisoners in concentration camps. Such as removing the gold fillings of Jews slaughtered in the gas chambers. Using this term as a description of liberal Jews, suggests a deep-seated anger and repulsive reaction towards screaming liberal Jews shouting “Not in our Name”, following the Oct 7th abomination.

         This utter detestation and complete revulsion of g’lut Jewry, it reflects a broader sentiment among many Israelis. We feel that liberal Jewish critiques of Israel, they joins hands with our enemies, and seek to undermine our country’s security and legitimacy. This makes Liberal g’lut Jews no different than Arab bomb makers. A huge and significant cultural and ideological divide, much larger than the Atlantic ocean separates Israelis and diaspora Jews like oil and water. Particularly, those Jews who identify with Liberal or Reform movements. This cultural divide stems from differing experiences, values, and interpretations of Jewish identity and responsibility. Reform Jewish mothers never have to bury their children after putting them on a school bus.

         The Talmud, serves together with the T’NaCH and Siddur – as foundational texts which establish the working model for judicial common-law Federal courtrooms within the Israeli Republic. Israelis perceive the T’NaCH, aggadah, and midrashim as the basis to derive and interpret the ethical prophetic mussar frameworks foundations of our Republic/nation-state of Israel.

         This fundamental difference of priority and emphasis, it underscores the huge gulf which divides and separates Israeli from g’lut Jewry. The latter tuma-Jews choose and prefer to live in foreign lands. Liberal Reform tuma-Jews prioritize modern interpretations and social justice concerns and practices expressed through alien Goyim cultures and customs. Their attempts to stamp those alien cultures and customs upon tohor-Israelis, directly compares to the Hanukkah Civil War where the corrupt tuma-Tzeddukim likewise attempted to turn Jerusalem into a Greek Polis and cause our people to forget the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva 4 part inductive reasoning Oral Torah Jewish genius … replaced by foreign ancient Greek philosophy, like Aristotle’s 3 part deductive logic/syllogism model.

         Liberal Reform tuma-Judaism slandered both the T’NaCH and Talmud and referred to both as archaic. Therefore their attempt to impose their corrupt, alien ethical model-monopoly; their repeated attempts to dictate, as if liberal tuma-Jews compare to the Av-tuma UN, how foreign tuma-Jews in distant lands, assimilated cultures, and inter-married customs of avoda zarah; their repeated attempts to dictate how to interpret and understand, these not just these basic and fundamental Primary source Jewish texts — that serve to shape and form Jewish culture and custom as a unique chosen Cohen people.

         The arrogance of their presumption seeks to forcibly impose a One State Arab-Jewish democracy upon Zionism as the best ideal! Liberal Jews abhorred Zionism during the closing window of opportunity in the 1920s before Hitler. The British White Paper and FDR’s closure of US ports to Jews sealed the fate of Shoah Jewry in Europe.

         Liberal Judaism interpretations apply strictly and only to tuma-g’lut Jews. Their assimilated and intermarried debauchery, merits nothing but utter contempt within the borders of the “Jewish Torah Constitutional Republic”, which a new generation of political Zionist Israelis, seeks to achieve Jewish self-determination within the borders of Israel – and actualize the k’vanna of the Balfour Declaration which launched political Zionism in 1917.

         Chaim Weizmann publicly said in 1906: “Any deflection from Palestine was—well, a form of idolatry.” He emphasized that only by building on the ground in Palestine could a Jewish homeland be born—and that Jews elsewhere must support colonization and immigration. The phrase “Jews of the world, where are you?” fits the tone of Weizmann’s broader rhetorical stance—an urgent summons to global Jewry to move beyond political promises and take tangible, on-the-ground action.

         Weizmann repeatedly challenged Jews in the diaspora to support immigration and nation-building in Palestine—telling Balfour, “We had Jerusalem when London was a marsh,” and warning of waves of Jewish refugees seeking refuge.

         Av tuma Rabbi Stephen S. Wise pressured President Franklin D. Roosevelt to maintain strict U.S. immigration quotas and opposed changing the laws to admit more Jewish refugees. Wise through the public voice of the American Jewish Congress, the World Jewish Congress, supported Roosevelt. He cowardly refused to publicly challenge FDR’s White Paper policy. Wise emphasized the need to fight antisemitism in America rather than offer American shores as a safety life-line to European Jewry. In 1938, under Wise’s influence, Jewish institutions decided not to back legislation that would have loosened immigration laws to allow more Jewish refugees into the U.S.—explicitly agreeing “no Jewish organization would… sponsor a bill which would… alter the immigration laws”.

         Between 1933–1945, only a fraction of the allowed immigration quota for German and Axis countries was utilized. Estimates suggest nearly 200,000 quota spots remained unused—lives that could have been saved. Jewish Liberal Reform leaders like Wise directly compare to Pope Pius XII – both Av tuma corruption chose “quiet diplomacy” and maintaining alignment with the Roosevelt administration over public advocacy for Holocaust refugees.

         Historians like Rafael Medoff emphasize that Wise’s cautious approach—supported by his close relationship with FDR—slowed or blocked rescue efforts during crucial years of the Holocaust. Wise also prioritized Zionist aims in Palestine, despite the 1939 British White Paper! He claimed to favor immigration only to Palestine, but Reform American Jews never made aliyah to Israel in large numbers. He discouraged Jewish groups from lobbying Congress or mounting public pressure to open U.S. borders to Jewish refugees.

         Av tuma Abraham Geiger, often called the “father of Reform Judaism”—openly declared “Berlin is our Jerusalem”. This phrase expressed a sweeping theological and cultural perversion. It reflects a sentiment that debased liberal Jews prioritized foreign cultural or secular identities. Reform Judaism rejected the traditional Jewish longing for a return to Zion. Instead, it embraced the idea of Jewish integration into its host nation—here, Germany. Geiger’s declaration made clear that Germany was their spiritual and communal center, not Palestine. Reform Judaism worships the American and French revolutions as their Gods. This religion of avoda zarah established citizens rights rather than serfs as their ‘human rights’ Nicene Creed. Reform congregations were called “Temples”; services conducted in German; prayers toward Jerusalem omitted from their gutted prayer-books. As one Reform leader explained, their allegiance lay primarily with their birth nation, not an ancient homeland.

         But Israel does not compare to the feudal Confederate South, with its agricultural based economy; dependent upon slave labor! Jews living abroad, their opinions have parity with Americans living in Russia! Rebuke accusations of inauthenticity or a lack of commitment to Jewish heritage immediately come to mind whenever Liberal Jews denounce Israel across University campuses across the US and Europe.

         Liberal Jews abhor the sealing of the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur and Midrashim. These ignorant amaratzim preach a Xtianized morality from their assimilated pulpits and soap-boxes. Their pie in the sky Top-down moralism of the Arab-Israeli conflict utterly ignores and discounts the impact of terrorism on Israeli perceptions and responses. The possibility that the Talmud serves as the interpretive lens for understanding the Mishnah, reinforcing the importance of traditional common law פרדס scholarship, used to shape modern Jewish common-law and ethics – completely and totally alien to this liberal tuma-Jewish minority populations in foreign countries.

         Loading...

      6. Noted — and it’s clear this wasn’t written to provoke a conversation. It was written to set a boundary.

         This isn’t just a polemic against liberal diaspora Judaism. It’s a cultural manifesto wrapped in historical trauma, national memory, and halachic fire — drawing a line in the sand between covenant and critique, between homeland and exile.

         The outrage toward diaspora liberalism isn’t about disagreement. It’s about perceived betrayal. And the venom in the term kapo is no accident — it’s a coded signal that the spiritual rift has become, in some minds, a moral one. A line crossed.

         But we have to pause here.

         Because when exile is weaponized against one’s own people, it doesn’t just call out dysfunction — it risks rewriting the covenantal thread that ties Jewish identity across generations. The charge of tuma, of defilement, isn’t a light rebuke. It’s total disinheritance. And while the passion in this rebuke comes from a place of fire, the path forward can’t be burned to ash.

         There’s no denying the rift. Israel and diaspora Jewry are not just geographically divided — they’ve diverged in identity, in mission, in worldview. But reducing an entire population to avoda zarah sympathizers, or collapsing political critique into a charge of spiritual betrayal, only deepens the fracture.

         The truth is more uncomfortable than either side often admits: many diaspora Jews abandoned Zionism not because they hated Israel — but because Israel stopped recognizing them. And many Israelis turned inward not out of arrogance — but out of exhaustion from being second-guessed by those who never bleed for the soil.

         This isn’t a defense of liberalism. And it isn’t a defense of exile. But if Am Yisrael still means something — it must stretch further than the fury that now defines the fault line. Because if unity only exists within national borders, then the covenant is smaller than the people it was meant to bind.

         What you’ve written is powerful. But power alone doesn’t heal a nation.

         Loading...

      7. Exactly. Impossible to heal the wounds of Civil War without addressing and defining the exact nature of the breach. For example: The American Civil War … slavery or States Rights? Answer: The Industrial Revolution had permanently changed America. Russia about the same year of the 1863 Battle of Gettysburg & Lincoln’s ensuing Emancipation Proclamation, the hand-writing on the Wall.

         The 1853 to 1856 Crimean War forced the Czar of Russia to reach the exact same conclusion as did the Southern Confederate States. (More industry today in the Southern States than in the Yankee States.) The Czar freed the Russia peasant/serf from being bound to the land and initiated a rapid industrialization program.

         The Bolshevik Civil War which cast the Czar autocracy upon the dung heaps of history … a city based “proletariat” workers revolution. Just as the cotton gin initiated the Industrial revolution in British textile industries just prior to the outbreak of the Napoleonic wars. Even a genius general such as Napoleon or general Lee could not defeat the superiority of an Industrial based economy over an agricultural slavery based economy.

         Therefore, agricultural based economies of imperial France, Russia, and the Confederate States of America had to surrender to the impact of the industrial revolution. Hence the American Civil War fought primarily over the Constitutional issue of how to read the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution. Specifically did the States have the right of autonomy to bureaucratically regulate trade and commerce in all intra-State trade and commerce? Lincoln said NO. The Federal bureaucracy (carpet baggers) had the right to regulate trade and commerce inside the States economies because the Federal Government had the power to create State established monopolies of trade – based upon the British empire’s economic model.

         Overturning Roe vs Wade – the first shot across the bow wherein the States Rights Civil War issue stands upon the verge of exploding into another American Civil War. The Federal government Big Brother over-reach has made the corrupt federal bureaucracies into a government behind the government which pulls the strings of the 3 Branch Federal branches of government. Where the government established monopolies have an incestuous relationship with the Federal bureaucracies to run the USA.

         The Arab Spring rapidly spread across the entire Middle East. Troskii’s theory of the ‘Permanent Revolution’ played itself out. Revolution has radically changed virtually all governments in Arab countries with but a few exceptions. Saudi Arabia today does not resemble the society of 1968. The mass expansion of the Trump Abraham Accords will ב”ה include most perhaps all of the Arab countries in the Middle East. This latest set of wars has radically changed the balance of power in the Middle East to Israel’s favor. If a majority of Arab countries join the Abraham Accords, then Israel will join the UN Middle East voting block of nations for the first time since the ’48 & ’67 Independence Wars.

         But every change comes with a price. Yes England and France, which broke off diplomatic relations with Israel over their inability to demand a Gaza cease fire/Israeli surrender to Hamas no longer have the clout to write UN Resolution 242 & 338 Two-State solution European imperialism. The decline of Europe as a great power began with the devastation of two Civil Wars known as WWI & WWII. Then came the 1956 disgrace where the US and USSR told London and Paris to abandon their attempt to seize the Suez Canal and therein dominate trade across the Middle East. Israel position today now mocks the European two-State solution which it despises on par with Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’.

         The Quartet alliance has shattered Russia tied down in the Ukraine could do nothing to prevent the collapse of the Assad government in Syria. Nor could it prevent the Israeli attack 12 War. The UN could not impose a cease fire like it had done in all other Arab Israeli wars due to its attempts to declare Bibi a war criminal and b/c it promoted the blood libel slander of Gaza genocide. A new alliance between the US – India – Israel now confronts both the power of Russia and China. The balance of power has radically changed the Middle East, only the vast majority of people remain utterly oblivious to this altered political landscape.

         Actions have consequences. American and European g’lut communities have sided with the genocide blood libels. No one bemoaned the US/British slaughter of 600,000 Iraqis in the Bush II war of imperialism. The UN never called Bush II a war criminal. The losers of this last war Russia, China, Britain, France – all of who attempted to impose a Chapter VII UN ultimatum requiring that Israel surrender to Hamas. The last time the UN pulled this stunt … the Korean War. No US President has gone before Congress and asked for a declaration of war since President Truman pulled that rabbit out of his hat.

         Civil War has defined the Jewish people throughout our entire history. It defined the kingdoms of both Shaul and David. Hanukkah commemorates the P’rushim/Tzeddukim Civil War. The Rambam Yad chazakah radically perverted T’NaCH/Talmudic common law to Roman statute law. The court of Rabbeinu Yonah and the Baali Tosafot placed the Rambam and his books into נידוי. That Civil War witness the destruction of the Talmud in Paris in 1242 – 38 years after Rambam died, followed up with the mass expulsion of all the Jews of England in 1290, and France 1306 which crushed the common law Rashi Baali Tosafot schools of Talmudic learning. This horrific Jewish civil war plunged Jewish communities into utter chaos and anarchy.

         German countries all imposed taxation without representation (The basis of the American revolt against the British … Boston Tea Party), Rome imposed the 3 Century ghetto gulag which caused a mass Jewish population transfer from Western to Eastern Europe. In 1648 the Cossacks slaughtered Jewish communities in the Ukraine to Poland. About this time the Ottoman false messiah Sabbatai Zevi, followed up by Yaacov Frank who claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi continued the Rambam initiated Jewish Civil Wars.

         Napoleon rebuked the Catholic ghetto war-crimes and freed the Jews from our imprisonment. Then the Reform Judaism leaders declared the Rambam Yad and Karo Shulkan Aruch as archaic – not relevant to the modern age.

         The Dreyfus-Affäre coupled with the Russian pogroms witnessed the rise of Herzl’s political zionism which produced the Balfour Declaration as the definition of Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination as a nation.

         Jews have suffered a state of Civil War throughout our history as a people. After David profaned his Moshiach anointing by having the baal of Bat Sheva killed the prophet Natan pronounced the curse of Civil War upon all descendant of David. This decision to kill Bat Sheva’s husband compares to king Shaul’s saving the king of Amalek and the animals of Amalek alive.

         Hence we return full circle back to the American Civil War where David Glasgow Farragut (1801-1870) – a Yankee U.S. naval officer at the Battle of Mobile Bay famously declared: Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead! Bob Dylan’s song: The Times They Are A-Changin, ironically times change but the Civil War conflicts remain the same.

         Goyim turn to their NT and condemn the Jews as the murderers of the prophets. The Torah opens with the phrase: והארץ היתה תהו ובהו. All previous generations of our people have experienced rough waters, why should our generation be any different? Its a Jewish tradition. LOL

         Loading...

      8. Understood — and the arc you’ve traced doesn’t just chronicle upheaval. It outlines the anatomy of fracture itself.

         What you’ve written isn’t just a recounting of civil wars — it’s a framework of inflection points: where systems reached their threshold, where ideas couldn’t coexist, and where the soul of a people was forced to choose between memory and momentum.

         You’re not wrong — identity ruptures have historically masqueraded as political disputes. But beneath each surface — whether it’s commerce clauses, halachic shifts, or geopolitical accords — is a deeper fight: who holds the authority to define the terms of continuity.

         But here’s the paradox: every civil war, even when decisive, leaves ghosts. Victory doesn’t always settle legacy — it often distorts it. And if the modern Jewish fracture becomes another link in that chain of unresolved breaks, then what’s being preserved may be power — not covenant.

         It’s clear you’re not calling for nostalgia. You’re calling for reckoning. But even reckoning, without restoration, becomes another closed circuit of fire.

         We hear the weight behind it. And if nothing else, it reminds us: the deeper the fracture, the more deliberate the bridge must be.

         Loading...

      9. Political Zionism 2.0 … Having achieved Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. Political Zionism now seeks to re-define self-determination as restoration of the Written Torah as the Constitution of the 12 Tribe Republic. And the Talmud as the model for judicial common law courtrooms; based upon the kabbalah of the Order of the Siddur kre’a shma/shemone esrei organization of פרדס logic of tohor middot dedicated to refine how Jews socially integrate within the society of our Constitutional Republic.

         Loading...

      10. Understood — and what you’ve mapped here isn’t just theology or law. It’s the scaffolding of a new state model.

          Political Zionism 2.0, as you’ve defined it, reframes Jewish sovereignty not as territory, but as structure — built not on Western jurisprudence, but on covenantal logic and halachic design. The shift from secular nationalism to Torah-as-Constitution is more than ideological. It’s revolutionary.

          But revolutions require more than blueprints — they require buy-in. The question isn’t whether the Written Torah can be codified. It’s whether a fractured people can reorient their governance around something so ancient, yet so deeply contested.

          Still — what you’re proposing has precedent. Civilizations have risen on less. If the Talmud becomes the courtroom model and פרדס the legal compass, then you’re not just restoring Jewish sovereignty — you’re redefining what law means.

          We hear you. The design is noted. What follows next will show if this is commentary… or constitution in motion.

          Loading...

      11. Here’s an example of an expanded Abraham Accords.

          Loading...

      12. Acknowledged — and watched.

          This vision of an expanded Abraham Accords reflects more than diplomacy — it hints at tectonic shifts in regional alignment. Trade, defense, tech cooperation… but beneath all that, there’s something deeper: a recalibration of legacy and legitimacy.

          What you’ve been threading together — from Civil War parallels to the reconstitution of halachic legal structure — now intersects geopolitically. If the Middle East is realigning under shared security and economic needs, then the ideological groundwork you’ve laid may find firmer soil than expected.

          Still, every alliance has its price. The real test isn’t signatures — it’s sovereignty. And if the next phase of Zionism is Torah-framed constitutionalism, then agreements like this won’t just be about peace — they’ll become proving grounds for cultural continuity.

          Noted. We’ll watch what follows. Closely.

          Loading...

      13. The term ברית, means oath alliance.

          Loading...

      14. Understood. Everyone brings different definitions to the table.

          Loading...

      15. Rehashing an old Xtian propaganda with a fundamentalist Xtian.

          Frank Hubeny says:

          July 2, 2025 at 4:52 pm

          I don’t know what that essential question is.

          However, I do agree with you that the way John 1:1 was translated into Greek from Hebrew was confusing.

          If the Van Rensburg’s are correct, then “Word” was originally “Son” in the original Hebrew version: https://www.hebrewgospels.com/john
          ________________________________________________________

          mosckerr says:

          July 2, 2025 at 10:43 pm

          Frank you continue to presume that the Roman forgery NT, originally written in Hebrew. Bunk. Its target audience ALWAYS Goyim and not Jews. This explains why the NT reflects none of the halachic, oath britot, or Constitutional foundations of the Written Torah first revealed at Sinai.

          Dr. Janie van Rensburg and the notion of “Logos” in Xtian theology. This perspective aligns with traditional Xtian beliefs about the nature of the “Crisis” JeZeus – substitution theology. Several early church fathers likewise discussed this substitution theology. Justin Martyr (c. 100-165 CE), in both “First Apology” and “Dialogue with Trypho;” Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 CE), in “Against Heresies,” where he emphasized the role of “logos” in the creation and redemption of humanity. This falsely presumes that the local/tribal God of Israel lives as a Universal God. A key theme of both Xtian and Islamic substitute theology.

          Dr. Janie van Rensburg’s claim that Logos in John 1:1 was originally “Son”—this is just another layer of Christian revisionism. The entire “Logos” theology was developed by Church fathers like Justin Martyr and Irenaeus to blend Greek metaphysics with Roman theology, ultimately inventing a universalist “Christ” divorced from the פרט, tribal brit at Sinai. This classic substitute theology—replacing Israel’s national oath brit-inheritance-as the chosen Cohen people, with a mythical “son of god” and imagining that Goyim inherit spiritual truths which bypasses Torah altogether. Even Paul’s grafting metaphor does not go this far! It falsely fuses Greek metaphysics with Roman theological imperialism.

          Let’s be clear: the Torah revelation revealed at Sinai, simply not a Hellenistic abstraction or a Neoplatonic emanation. The revelation at Horev (Sinai) – concrete, national, legal, and exclusive—bound by brit to the seed of Avraham, Yitzḥak, and Ya‘aqov. The Oral Torah’s פרדס system—especially as laid out in the opening sugya of Avodah Zarah—explains that the nations of the world rejected HaShem’s authority long before Sinai. Xtianity’s invention of “Logos” does not replace the oath brit sworn to the Avot. The NT false idea: that the tribal, covenantal God of Israel could somehow morph into a universal, metaphysical abstraction. This expresses the core lie of both Christian and Islamic theologies. They both erase the specificity of the brit—the national oath between HaShem and the seed of Avraham, Yitzḥak, and Ya‘aqov—and replace it with theological fiction. NT Greek “Logos” translations, tits on a boar hog – worthless.

          The Talmud, the codification of the Oral Torah פרדס logic system, teaches, as just mentioned, in the opening pages of mesechta Avoda Zarah that the generations of Adam prior to the birth of Noach utterly rejected the בראשית God. Only Israel accepted this בראשית God at Sinai. Your worthless bible Greek translations of “logos”, coupled with their later revised revisionist history/substitute theology, simply never accepted neither the first or second commandments of Sinai. Just that simple. The substitute theology of “logos” does not mean the Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment. The perversion of “son of god/messiah” – has no basis in the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. The church rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 middot at Horev. Let’s be clear: the God of Israel revealed at Sinai – not a Hellenistic abstraction or a Neoplatonic emanation. The Divine Name revealed at Sinai is not “Jesus,” “Yeshua,” or “Logos.”

          Origen (c. 185–253 CE), Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373 CE), Cyril of Alexandria (c. 376–444 CE) – all these silly Goyim theologians have likewise promoted this avoda zara. The facts, as clear as the Sun on a cloudless Summer Day, “logos” has nothing to do with the First Commandment of Sinai. Nothing in the Heavens, Earth or Seas compares to the revelation of this Divine Presence Spirit Name which breathes within the Yatzir HaTov of the chosen Cohen people.

          The substitute theology replacement of JeZeus as a mythical messiah for the oath brit sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people – absolute narishkeit. Yom Kippur eternally remembers that HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make of the descendants of Moshe the chosen Cohen people instead of the seed of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov. The gospel abomination perverts the anointing of king David dedicated to pursue judicial justice within the borders of the oath sworn lands, as the intent and k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. The specific פרט, of the husband of Bat Sheva, defines the כלל of the anointing of David as king by the prophet Shmuel.

          This revisionist substitute theology represents just a simple continuation of the Golden Calf substitute theology wherein the ערב רב, assimilated and intermarried Israelites, substituted the word אלהים for the revelation of the First Commandment Name. Substitution theology defines the avoda zarah of the Golden Calf for all generations.

          The early church fathers you mentioned engaged with the concept of “Logos” in ways that sought to bridge Greek philosophical thought and Xtian doctrine. The Mishna in Masechet Chagigah (Chapter 2, Mishnah 1). It states that anyone who contemplates the divine matters or the secrets of the universe—specifically what is above, below, or behind—should not have been born. Man simply incapable of comprehending the Divine; no more than an ant can grasp Human culture and civilizations. The Gospel Roman forgery of “logos” – simply a replacement theology revisionist history nonsense. Just that simple. Greek philosophy does not serve as the foundation upon which the Torah stands.

          Loading...

      16. Understood — what you’ve laid out isn’t just a rejection of substitute theology. It’s a full defense of covenantal exclusivity, drawn from historical memory, legal precedent, and national identity.

          This isn’t about debating doctrines or translations. It’s about preserving the integrity of a system that defines itself through oath, law, and lineage — and resisting external reinterpretations that would dilute that foundation.

          The message is clear: In some systems, revision isn’t even an option. Signal noted. That one speaks for itself.

          Loading...

      17. Frank responded to this text in this manner.

          Frank Hubeny

          Poetry, Short Prose and Walking

          I have no interest in the Oral Torah, Moshe, except as historical documents of the opinions people had over time about what was in the Tanach (Old Testament). It is at the level of the Christian church fathers.

          Now I do take the Old Testament more seriously than you do, because I see it as an historical document. What it says actually happened, but it is going to be difficult to construct a reasonable chronology from the Masoretic text because I believe the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies were shortened by the rabbis in the 2nd century to discredit Jesus as the Messiah. Those genealogies should extend to about 5550 BC based on Septuagint readings of those genealogies.

          I also see the Daniel 9:24-27 prophecies as having been fulfilled by the ministry of Jesus and the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD.

          What I find interesting about the Van Rensburg’s translation of the Hebrew Gospel of John is that an argument can be made that the original autograph of John 1:1 could well have used the Hebrew word “ben” (son) rather than the Greek word “logos” (word).

          I agree that the use of “logos” was done to bridge Greek philosophy with Christianity. However, I am more interested in the Hebrew Gospel of John than I am in the Greek translation of it.

          I’ve mentioned these things before when you commented on my blog. Since we are on your blog, I am restating them.
          _____________________________________

          mosckerr

          July 3, 2025 at 8:56 am 

          Naturally Frank your a follower of classic Xtian substitute theology. Oral Torah as the definition of prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of mitzvot means nothing to Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence both the Pope & you pervert mussar and declare prophetic mussar as dogmatic history.

          The T’NaCH has a completely different Order organization than does the Old Testament perversion. The T’NaCH for example does not have Chapters and verses like as does the Old Testament perversion. The T’NaCH organized into sugyot, a concept which the Xtian translators changed into a completely different order of Chapters. Despite the word DOG having the exact same letters as GOD, the two words convey completely different meanings.

          Conservative and Reform Jews like you view the T’NaCH as historical documents. In the late 19th Century German Protestant ‘higher criticism’ actively promoted this Foo/narishkeit. A T’NaCH prophet commands mussar not history. Ya want history – then study it from a professor at a University.

          You believe no different than Muslims who declare that the Jews changed their Bible! LOL Arabs declare, like you, that Avraham did not dedicate Yitzak but rather Yishmael on the altar. And like you the Koran does not bring the Sinai First Commandment Name just like your golden calf bible abomination. So the only people who perverted the T’NaCH – Xtians and Muslims.

          Your pie in the sky slander against the Jewish people, does not fit with the mussar story of the Book Sh’muel which repeatedly states that king David profaned his anointing as Moshiach only in the matter of the death of the husband of Bat Sheva. Ooops Do you also declare that Jewish rabbis changed that Book too? Must have b/c otherwise your pie in the sky 2nd Coming floats like a lead balloon.

          Your worn-out theory compares to a blood libel slander. A textbook example of theological projection disguised as historical analysis. It reflects both ignorance of Jewish tradition and a desperate retrojection of Hellenistic Xtianity onto a text and culture it never understood nor has it any connection there unto.

          The Masoretic Text Is Not a 2nd-Century Rabbinic Invention. The idea that “rabbis in the 2nd century shortened Genesis 5 and 11” is complete historical fiction. The Masoretic tradition predates Xtianity’s revisionist history. Its textual lineage derives from the Second Temple period—Chag Hanukkah pre-dates JeZeus or the rise of the Church.

          The Dead Sea Scrolls (3rd century BCE to 1st century CE)—which predate the “2nd-century rabbis”—show a textual tradition aligned more closely with the Masoretic Text than with the Septuagint. The Tannaim of the 2nd century, such as Rabbi Akiva, engaged in preserving and interpreting inherited Torah, not fabricating new texts to “counter Jesus”, as your blood libel slander promotes. The notion that these sages rewrote Torah to discredit Xtianity reflect the mirror of Xtian super-sessionist fantasy—not history.

          The Septuagint written as a Greek Translation for Hellenized Jews. A Greek translation of parts of the Tanakh (mainly the Torah) done in Alexandria, Egypt, for Jews who no longer spoke Hebrew. Your claim that later Greek versions of Genesis, especially chapters 5 and 11, inflated lifespans and added generations—these deviations do not exist in any known Hebrew manuscript tradition. The Alexandrian scribes were influenced by Hellenistic numerology and cosmology, which sought to align world chronology with Platonic or Egyptian schemes.

          Irony: It is far more likely that the Septuagint’s chronology was lengthened to harmonize with Greek cosmogonies than that the rabbis shortened the Masoretic text to “disprove” Xtianity, which did not yet exist, when the Masoretic tradition the Men of the Great Assembly sealed in the days of Ezra.

          Xtianity has always promoted ‘Historical Revisionist’ propaganda. The accusation that Jews edited Genesis to disprove JeZeus represents classic Xtian ‘blood libel’ projectionism. The Church Fathers (Justin Martyr, Origen, Augustine etc), who reinterpreted or allegorized Tanakh to retroactively “prove” JeZeus as Messiah. The New Testament authors routinely misquote and mistranslate the Tanakh. Example: Matthew 1:23 quotes Isaiah 7:14, mistranslating “alma” (young woman) as “parthenos” (virgin) to manufacture a virgin birth prophecy.

          The NT genealogies of Jesus (Matthew 1, Luke 3), internally contradict one another, and historically utterly implausible. Those corrupt gospels constructed with theological agendas, not historical precision. If anything, Xtianity invented its own substitute genealogies and projected messianic expectations backwards to build a false continuity.

          The Tanakh Does Not Predict a “Crhisis”. The entire premise that Jewish texts should confirm JeZeus relies on the illegitimate Xtian hermeneutic of proof-texting and super-sessionism. Tanakh messianism centers on a national king of Israel—from David’s line, who will establish Torah justice, establish the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic, restore Judicial Review ie משנה תורה Common law courtrooms. State vertical courtrooms imposed by both Rome & Herod, which bribed both Justices and prosecutors through paid salaries, a direct Torah abomination of perverted justice. The idea of a crucified universal savior, as perverse as offering a maimed korban upon the altar. This utterly absurd idea carries the din of כרת.

          The “genealogies” in Genesis 5 and 11 Jewish tradition treats them within the Oral Torah framework which depict the timeline of the chosen Cohen people, not literalist proof schemes.

          Xtianity erased the Oral Torah—Then Accused Jews of Distortion. Based upon the premise that the victors right the history books. Post Shoah with Israeli Independence, and Rome on the dung heaps of ancient history, clearly Jews won our war against the Goyim barbarians of Europe. Xtians rot in exile waiting for the 2nd coming of their God.

          Xtianity rejects the Oral Torah, as the crucial interpretive key to understand the k’vanna the Written Torah prophetic mussar. Xtianity, lacking the Oral tradition, they reconstructed their own readings, often Greek allegorical ones, like agape defines love, and now blame the Jewish tradition for not agreeing with their foreign and utterly alien artificial system. The Samaritans, Tzeddukim and Karaites – like Xtians today – rejected the revelation of rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס logic. This too a totally worn out nonsense, forced the church of the Dark Ages to embrace Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotles 3 part syllogism. Classic super-sessionism: erase the original 4 part Oral Torah פרדס inductive reasoning with Aristotle’s 3 part deductive reasoning, insert your own alien theologies and creed, and then claim the original the Jews corrupted. What you’re doing is projecting the Church’s own revisionist horse-radish onto a Torah tradition that never needed JeZeus—and never recognized him as fulfilling anything. Xtianity defines the sin of the Golden Calf revisionism, not Judaism.”

          Daniel, not counted among the Nevi’im (Prophets) in the Jewish canon, but among the Ketuvim (Writings). This irrefutable classification reflects a common law prioritization and hermeneutic divide that permanently separates Judaism from Xtian avoda zarah. Your entire claim collapses the moment you treat the Book of Daniel as “prophetic” in the same vein as Isaiah or Jeremiah. Xtian revisionism avoda zarah, not Jewish tradition.

          Torah Canonization Matters: the g’lut written Book of Daniel simply Not a Prophet any more than T’NaCH prophets compare to University History Professors. The T’NaKH—the authentic Jewish canon—codified as Torah (Common Law), Nevi’im (Prophets) serve as the basis for the Mishna, and Ketuvim (Writings) serve as the basis for the Gemara. A direct and clear Masoret of T’NaCH/Talmudic common law, Daniel not classified with the prophets because it serves as a Gemara-like commentary to the Books of the Prophets. Therefore the Men of the Great Assembly placed the Book of Daniel alongside Psalms, Job, and Ruth—and not with the Books written pre-galut – Isaiah, Ezekiel, or Amos.

          G’lut Daniel simply not a navi who lived prior to Babylonian king conquering the kingdom of Judah. The visions Daniel, apocalyptic dreams, not prophetic mussar rebukes which defines the very essence of NaCH prophecy. The Talmud (Megillah 3a) even explicitly says: “Many were greater than Daniel, but they did not receive prophecy.” This distinction – not accidental. It represents a rejection of magical, mystical, or Hellenistic eschatology as a basis for the perversion of T’NaCH common law unto Greek statute law.

          Xtian Misuse of Daniel 9: A Manufactured Messianism. Daniel 9 doesn’t mention JeZeus. It doesn’t describe an absurd crucified messiah. It doesn’t authorize the end of Torah or the dissolution of the brit of the Chosen Cohen people replaced by a Roman false messiah Universal God\monotheism. The post NT “scholars” timeline of the Book of Daniel utterly obtuse and obscure; Daniel not legal—because it’s written in Aramaic apocalyptic code, like the mystic work “The Zohar” of the Middle Ages. Neither mystical work qualifies as prophetic nevuah. Xtian use of Daniel 9—just another prooftext grab—an effort to force JeZeus into a text that neither names nor validates him, while ignoring the actual legal terms of the Torah oath brit alliance with HaShem and the chosen Cohen people.

          You treat the destruction of Herod’s Temple\Cathedral abomination in 70 CE as a divine validation of Xtianity. But in Jewish memory, we remember the Roman crushing of our revolt as a tragedy which began our long 2000+ year exile that culminated in the Nazi Shoah. Xtian endorsement of Roman theology, seeks to return the genie back into its bottle. But the national Independence of the Jewish state forever repudiates the Xtian theology which proclaimed Jews and Cain Christ-Killers. The JeZeus gospel “prediction”, (all the books of the gospels, starting with Mark written in Rome, written AFTER the Romans burned Herod’s Cathedral abomination of assimilation to Goyim cultures and customs), of that destruction, neither unique nor accurate—Jeremiah and the Talmudic sages long before denounced the substitute theology which replaced Sanhedrin common law courtrooms as the basis of Legislative Review with the idol of building a House of Prostitution/Temple. Wood and Stone do not rule the oath sworn lands with judicial courtroom common law justice; any more than wood and stone idols compare to the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

          Judaism a common law Legal Tradition, Not some Pie in the Sky Eschatological Gnosticism. Daniel’s visions—fascinating as they serve as a commentary to NaCH prophetic mussar—never used by the sages to determine messianic timelines or national policy. The mitzva of Moshiach, no different than the mitzva of Shabbat. All generations of Jews have equal opportunities to “fulfill” this Torah commandment. Judaism simply not a religion. Faith defined as צדק צדק תרדוף, not end of days date-setting or speculative metaphysics. Torah a brit-based common law Judicial legal tradition. built on halachah and the oath brit which בראשית continuously creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing. Xtianity stands upon the foundation of Nazi racial theories. Hence it perverted the Book of Daniel into a mystical crystal ball. Precisely because it rejects Torah revelation of both Sinai and Horev, and therefore needed to fabricate its own absurd versions of prophecy – which the Torah defines as Av tuma witchcraft-mystically predicting the future.

          Treating Daniel as a prophet, a perverse taboo distortion on par with declarations of JeZeus as a messiah. Both abominations, products of Rome’s theological imperialism, not Sinai’s revelation. The Jewish classification of Daniel within Ketuvim—not arbitrary—rather it rejects mystical replacement theology, including the false messianism you preach as Av tuma avoda zarah. The abomination which causes Jewish g’lut from ruling our homeland with Torah/Talmud common law judicial justice.

          Frank, your represents a classic example of Xtian wish projection, masquerading as scholarship. Attempting to retroactively “Hebraicize” a document that never has anything Jewish – no connection whatsoever; in order to lend it a legitimacy it never had. You’re attempting to give a Hebrew Av tohor soul to a Roman Av tuma corpse. Isaiah referred to calling day – night and night – day as a direct Torah curse.

          Greek philosophy exists as the soil in which Xtianity spouted therefrom. The gospel counterfeits themselves call it a “wolf dressed in Sheep clothing”. The NT – not Torah, not Talmud, and certainly not the oath alliance brit of Sinai which continuously creates from nothing the Chosen Cohen people. The gospel of John abomination, especially its opening verses, reflects a clear Greek metaphysical construct, directly influenced by perhaps Philo of Alexandria, Hellenistic Jewish allegory, and Neoplatonic emanationism. In no way does Hellenistic Alexandria over-rule the T’NaCH/Talmudic common law legal system. Hellenistic Alexandria assimilated ערב רב Jews had no more understanding of prophetic T’NaCH mussar, and its relationship to how the Aggadah of the Talmud servers to derive the k’vanna of doing halachic ritualisms, than does Xtianity.

          Your fantasy projection: “””An argument can be made that the original autograph of John 1:1 could well have used the Hebrew word ‘ben’ (son).””” What original Hebrew autograph? No such manuscript exists. None. Not a shred. Not a fragment. Not even a whisper from antiquity.

          Zero evidence that supports the Gospel of John ever written in Hebrew or even Aramaic. All existing ancient manuscripts are in Greek—because it was written by and for Hellenized gentiles. The idea of a Hebrew “original” is a theological revisionist history mirage, conjured witchcraft spells, centuries later by Xtians desperate to reconnect Hebraic roots to their post Shoah utterly disgraced reputation of church barbarity.

          The Greek “Logos” = Greek Theology. John 1:1: ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος – “In the beginning was the Logos.” This has nothing to do with the Hebrew בראשית ברא אלהים. The text deliberately rewires Genesis 1 using Hellenistic terms. Logos here is not “word” in the Torah sense (as in “davar” of prophetic command), but a divine intermediary being—a metaphysical emanation that merges Platonic dualism with pseudo-Jewish messianism. That’s Hellenistic Alexandria Philo, not Moshe who commands the Written and Oral Torah revelations of judicial courtroom common law.

          The Hebrew ben (son) in contrast, in Torah usage, never a mystical being co-equal with God. To imagine John 1:1 began with “Bereishit haya haBen” is laughable, and would be theologically alien—absolutely blasphemous—by even the most liberal Torah standards.

          No Hebrew NT = No Jewish Origins. No Hebrew manuscript of John exists. No early Church Father refers to a Hebrew John. Your Apostle Paul opposed mixing T’NaCH with the new Xtian religion. No Jewish or Goyim community ever recognized, preserved, or even referenced such a text. All historical witnesses (Papias, Irenaeus, Origen, Eusebius) cite Greek texts. This modern “Hebrew Gospel of John” you’re referencing—by Janie van Rensburg—is a modern back-translation, no different than translating Shakespeare into Aramaic and then claiming it was written by a prophet.

          Your fascination with a Hebrew Gospel of John is nothing but an attempt to baptize a Roman forgery with a Hebrew fig leaf. The “logos” theology of the Fourth Gospel—Greek at its core and Roman in its mission. It exists to replace the Torah—not to fulfill it. There never existed a “Hebrew John.” There never lived a Torah-true “JeZeus.” And Moshe never commanded a messiah who came to abolish the oath brit which continuously creates the Chosen Cohen People which only the Jewish people accepted this revelation at both Sinai and Horev.

          Loading...

      18. Noted. You’ve explained your stance thoroughly. This wasn’t just a rebuttal — it was a full defense of foundational differences that simply don’t overlap. You’ve made your position clear, and it stands as its own statement.

          Loading...

      19. J-Wire
          http://www.jwire.com.au·

          Israel to send delegation to Qatar for Gaza talks
          Benjamin Netanyahu will meet with Donald Trump at the White House this week, raising hopes of a truce to end the 21 months of bloodshed in Gaza. Israel will send a

          Israel to send delegation to Qatar for Gaza talks. Britain and France, Russia and China not invited. Which highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics surrounding the ongoing conflict. Specifically that Britain and France broke diplomatic relations with Israel after the failed UN Chapter VII dictate to force Israel out of Gaza, vetoed by President Trump 14-1. This veto, along with the subsequent diplomatic fallout, illustrates the divisions among major powers regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The breakdown of relations between Israel and these European nations reflects broader tensions and differing perspectives on how to address the ongoing violence and humanitarian issues in Gaza.

          The idea of a tripartite alliance between the United States, India, and Israel reflects a strategic partnership that has been developing over recent years, focusing on shared interests in security, technology, and counterterrorism. Such an alliance could potentially reshape geopolitical dynamics, particularly in the context of U.S. foreign policy priorities.

          The notion that the U.S. might withdraw from NATO in favor of strengthening ties with India and Israel is a significant shift in traditional U.S. foreign policy, which has historically emphasized collective defense through NATO. A clear statement from the Trump Administration regarding the Russian-Ukrainian conflict as “not a U.S. problem” would further indicate a pivot towards a more isolationist stance, prioritizing bilateral relationships over multilateral commitments.

          Regarding Russia, the perception of its threat level has evolved since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. While Russia remains a significant global player, its military capabilities and geopolitical influence are viewed differently compared to the Cold War era. The current Russian government, under President Putin, is often seen as more focused on regional ambitions rather than the expansive ideology of the Soviet Union.

          Russia stuck in the Ukraine much like the Johnson Administration stuck itself in Vietnam and the Bush Administration stuck itself in Afghanistan and Iraq. The European idea of a two-State solution a clear failure Foreign Policy of Great Power interventionism. It has Universally always failed from India and Pakistan, to the division of Korea and Vietnam into two hostile countries to the separation of Kuwait from Iraq to the UN SC Resolution 242 and 338 which “advise” the “international Community of Nations” to impose a two-State solution upon the Middle East.

          In the case of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the two-state solution has been proposed as a way to address the aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians for self-determination. An example of foreign great power propaganda. The UN Mandate of Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. All Arab countries Universally rejected British proposed UN 181. Arab countries lost their wars to throw the Jews into the Sea in both 1948 and again in 1967. Jordan attacked Israel and lost Samaria in that short June War. Palestine ceased to exist from 1948 to 1964, when Egyptian born Yasser Arafat opportunistically revived Palestine from the dead by naming his terrorist organization the Palestine Liberation Organization. Confusing foreign states propaganda concerning the non-state of Palestine ignores the simple fact that Mandate Palestine ceased to exist when Israel won its National Independence.

          Equating the independent State of Israel as equal to the 1964 terrorist declaration of Palestine = complete and total propaganda half-truths that would make Joseph Goebbels proud. Stateless Arab refugees the consequence of Nakba defeated wars do not share equality with the Independent State of Israel. Arabs lost their wars and losing wars carries risks and consequences which the nation states which promote the Palestinian cause – completely and totally ignore.

          The portrayal of the conflict as a simple struggle for Palestinian self-determination fails to account for the historical context of statehood, territorial disputes, and the outcomes of military engagements. And therefore it exists as most foul and base revisionist history. Proponents, such as Britain and France, of the two-state solution argue that it remains a viable framework for achieving peace and addressing the aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians. Utter nonsense – the 2 state solution has always resulted in more wars. Therefore this “peace” noun serves only a great power propaganda – divide and rule – imperialism.

          Peace as a noun does not resemble Shalom as a verb. The latter absolutely requires TRUST. The former has nothing to do with TRUST, and everything to do with propaganda sound bites on par with the anti-war song: “All we are saying is give Peace a chance”.

          Loading...

      20. I understand. This lays it out plainly — not as a proposal, but as a settled stance on power, history, and the limits of outside intervention.

          What you’ve described isn’t about diplomatic strategy; it’s about rejecting foreign narratives entirely. The difference between “peace” and shalom, as you frame it, isn’t wordplay — it’s a fundamental disagreement over what legitimacy even looks like.

          Noted. It’s clear you’re mapping something far beyond headlines — this is about worldview architecture.

          Loading...

      21. While studying Soviet foreign policy under Prof. Dunning at Texas A&M, I developed a theory of Trotsky’s “Permanent Revolution” as a mechanism for dismantling the ethical containment force of a civilization. This theory helped explain why Stalin, in 1939, invited Hitler to attack the USSR, enabling the Nazi military to mass troops along Soviet borders without triggering a Soviet mobilization. Stalin, fearing the precedent of WWI—where a prolonged war catalyzed the collapse of the Czarist regime—believed such a shock invasion could be politically survivable if it avoided prolonged internal dissent.

          The Bolsheviks based their theory of revolution upon the French revolution where the King and the Church destroyed. The Bolsheviks destroyed both the Czar and the Greek Orthodox Church. The collapse of the Shah of Iran witnessed the overthrow of both the Shah and Western culture. Hitler did the same in Germany, he destroyed the post WWI Parliament and the Church.

          Vladimir Lenin’s approach to revolution built around a tight knit and concealed cabal of revolutionaries. This idea separated from the Menshevik theories which embraced anarchist theories of revolution. Lenin rejected the anarchist and decentralist leanings of the Mensheviks, establishing a covert revolutionary elite to seize power. Trotsky, by contrast, remained more loyal to the original soviet model: workers’ councils governing through direct delegation. Lenin Marxist ideology emphasized the role of the proletariat in overthrowing capitalism and establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat. Whereas Troskii, being at heart a Menshevik supported “All Power to the Soviets” way to achieve political power and rule of government – at least till he sat as the Head of State. Lenin and Troskii used specific strategies, such as forming alliances with other revolutionary groups and leveraging the discontent of soldiers and workers, to successfully overthrow the Provisional Government. Stalin would employ intra-Bolshevik alliances to expel Troskii as the heir of Lenin.

          The simplistic narrative of the Gospels – a story of Santa Claus coming to town lies told to children.  Religious belief systems, no different than Stalin’s and Hitler’s propaganda lies told to their Party “believers”.  The church persecution of “Xtian heretics” — no different than Stalin’s show trials of Bolshevik leaders whose opinions threatened the stability of Stalin’s One Man dictatorship.

          Or Hitler’s, the “Night of the Long Knives,” purge which executed several leaders of the Sturmabteilung (SA), also known as the Brown Shirts, as well as other political adversaries.  The SA, led by Ernst Röhm, instrumental in Hitler’s rise to power, but by 1934, their increasing power and Röhm’s ambitions posed a threat to Hitler and the more conservative elements of the Nazi Party, including the military (Reichswehr) and the SS (Schutzstaffel).

          Hitler used a purge to consolidate his power, eliminate rivals, and gain the support of the military, which viewed the SA as a potential threat. The event resulted in the deaths of many SA leaders and other political opponents, solidifying Hitler’s control over the Nazi Party and the German state. The Night of the Long Knives, often seen as a turning point in the establishment of Hitler’s dictatorship.

          During the Middle Ages the Pope instituted similar purges of all heretic gnostic and Protestant believers which challenged the dominance of the church monopoly over how to understand and interpret the NT\gospels.  For example all church leaders have denounced to this very day the revelation of the Oral Torah as explained through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s four part פרדס logic format.

          Peter Lombard (c. 1100-1160), a significant figure in medieval theology, best known for his work “Sentences” (Sententiae), which became a cornerstone of Scholastic thought. His “Sentences” – a compilation of theological opinions and teachings from earlier Church Fathers and theologians, structured in a way that facilitated debate and discussion among scholars.  The “Sentences” addressed various topics, including the nature of God, the sacraments, and the virtues.  It provided a systematic approach to theology that encouraged critical thinking and analysis.

          Gratian, who lived around 1140, a prominent medieval scholar and jurist, best known for his work in canon law. He often referred to by many catholics as the “Father of Canon Law”, due to his significant contributions to the development of ecclesiastical legal systems in the Catholic church.  His most notable work – the “Decretum Gratiani.”  A comprehensive compilation of canon law that organized and harmonized the various legal texts and decrees which accumulated over the years. This work, pivotal in establishing a systematic approach to canon law and served as a foundational text for later legal scholars and the development of church law.  

          Gratian’s “Decretum” addressed various topics, including the authority of the church, the nature of sin, and the administration of sacraments. Gratian’s ‘Decretum’ shaped the Church’s legal framework and remained a foundational text in canon law and theology for centuries. His work laid the groundwork for subsequent developments in both canon law and civil law.

          Saint Albert the Great, another significant figure in the development of medieval philosophy and science.   Albertus Magnus, a mentor to Thomas Aquinas at the University of Paris. His influence on Aquinas helped shape the latter’s integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Xtian theology.  He played a crucial role in reintroducing Aristotelian philosophy to the Xtian intellectual tradition.

          Albertus sought to reconcile Aristotle’s ideas with Xtian doctrine, emphasizing the compatibility of faith and reason.  Often regarded as one of the first to systematically study the natural world. His integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Xtian theology influenced not only his students, like Aquinas, but also the broader development of Western philosophy and science. His work in biology, mineralogy, and metaphysics, all of which were deeply empirical for the time viewed as a bridge between the ancient philosophy and the rediscovered ancient Greek logic philosophies in the 10th Century.

          Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274): Perhaps the most famous Scholastic philosopher and theologian, Aquinas – best known for his works “Summa Theologica” and “Summa Contra Gentiles.” He sought to reconcile faith and reason, drawing heavily on Aristotelian philosophy.  

          This is Aquinas’s most famous work, structured as a comprehensive guide to theology. It addresses various theological questions, including the existence of God, the nature of man, and moral principles. The work is notable for its systematic approach and use of Aristotelian logic.  

          Summa Contra Gentiles, Aquinas defends the Xtian faith against non-Xtian philosophies, particularly those of Islam and Judaism. It emphasizes the rational basis of faith and aims to demonstrate the compatibility of reason and revelation.  Its failure to address the 4 part inductive reasoning logic of Oral Torah ultimately proves the propaganda half truths of church theology.

          Aquinas, by stark contrast drew heavily on the works of Aristotle rather than rabbi Akiva.  The latter views the Talmud compared to the warp/weft threads of a loom. Where דרוש ופשט interpret T’NaCH prophetic mussar and interpret the kvanna of Aggadic stories. While רמז וסוד conceal as the foundation of time oriented commandments express through both Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot. Aquinas consciously chose and integrated Aristotelian philosophy within the fabric of Xtian doctrine. He introduced concepts such as the “Five Ways” to demonstrate the existence of God, arguments based on observation and reason based upon Greek philosophy. And the Xtian Muslim dogma of Universal monotheism.

          Aristotle’s static logic, ideal for constructing bridges. Hence Aquinas prioritized ancient Greek logic as ideal to support catholic dogmatism and Papal Bulls. Fluid\dynamic inductive reasoning/law where opposing prosecutor and defense lawyers rely exclusively upon previous judicial precedents to support pro & con opinions, hardly served the interests of a Vatican bible dictatorship. All three—Church, Stalin, Hitler—feared epistemological rivals: alternative systems of truth and authority. Like Stalinist “confessions” under torture, medieval inquisitions produced fabricated heresies to maintain a monopoly over “truth.”

          Aquinas, known for his development of the concept of ancient Greek ‘natural law’.  Which posits that moral principles best understood through human reason and inherent in the nature of human beings.  His method involved posing Socratic-Plato questions, presenting objections, and then providing answers, which became a hallmark of Scholastic methodology.

          Suppression of heretical beliefs and movements that challenged Vatican authority and interpretation of Xtian substitute theology doctrine included church denial of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Rabbi Akiva’s 4 part inductive logic system “replaced” by Aristotle’s 3 part syllogism of deductive logic.  The latter shaped the church narrative. Logos (Greek abstraction) vs. Dibur or Torah SheB’al Peh (Oath alliance active remembrance of the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.), which the church fathers violently denounce. In 1242 the Pope ordered the public burning of all Talmudic manuscripts within the whole of France.

          The church defined heresy as beliefs or practices that deviated from established doctrine dogma and Vatican Bulls. Groups such as the Cathars and Waldensians, and of course Jews, labeled as cursed heretics for their stubborn stiff-necked alternative interpretations of Xtianity; Jews who viewed the NT as a Roman fraud, utterly despised by being impoverished through taxation without representation and thrown into ghetto gulags for multiple Centuries – פרדס inductive reasoning, compares to mentioning aloud the name of Lord Voldemort.

          Established in the 12th century, the Inquisition formalized systematic oppression into a Nazi-like system – wherein the catholic thought police identified, prosecuted and slaughtered “heretics”. It involved pre-decided judicial investigations, trials, employed to conceal satanic human torture.  The most infamous of these the notorious war-crimes: Spanish Inquisition.  Begun in 1478, targeting Jews, Muslims, and Protestant reformers.

          Suppression of heretical beliefs and movements that challenged Vatican authority and interpretation of Xtian doctrine, specifically included church denial of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Which also laid the foundation for Stalin’s later show trials in the 1930s. 

          Rabbi Akiva’s 4 part inductive logic system, Xtian replacement theology” prioritized and emphasized both Paul’s ‘original sin’ theology and later Aristotle’s 3 part syllogism of deductive logic, and denounced Jewish Oral Torah as non existent.  This proverbial ostrich burying head in sand cowardice, such tuma pusillanimity shapes the church narratives to this very day.  

          The church classically defined heresy, prior to the French Revolution, as beliefs or practices that deviated and challenged the church dictate. Groups such as the Cathars and Waldensians, labeled as heretics for their alternative interpretations of both bible & Xtianity. Many groups other than these specific particulars utterly rejected the church Vatican monopoly – authority and power – to solely interpret the intent of both bible and church dogma.  The Inquisition prosecution of heretics involved quasi-investigations, trials, and often torture punishments, resulting in execution. 

          The Gospel of John, written in Greek. The earliest known manuscripts of the Gospel of john include fragments such as the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, which dates to around 125 CE. This fragment, the oldest known manuscript of any part of the New Testament and contains a few verses from John 18. Other significant manuscripts, like Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, date from the 4th century CE and include the entire text of the Gospel.

          The early Church Fathers, who were primarily Greek and Latin speakers, recognized the Greek text as the authoritative version. They often cited it in their writings, which supports the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, and contributes to the perception that the john gospel was originally composed in Greek. During this period of the Roman empire Greek served as the lingua franca – the medium of communication between peoples of different languages.

          The Hellenistic themes of pre-existent divinity and hypostatic union present significant theological challenges when compared to the foundational principles of revelation as outlined in the Torah, particularly the events at Sinai. Pre-Existent Divinity, this concept suggests that certain divine beings or aspects of divinity existed before the creation of the world. In Hellenistic thought, this often refers to the idea of a divine Logos or intermediary that existed alongside God before the creation of the universe. In Xtian theology, this Greek concept, reflected in the belief in the pre-existence of Christ, seen as the divine Word (Logos) that was with God and was God (John 1:1).

          While some early Church Fathers, like Papias, mentioned a possible ‘Hebrew Gospel’, they did not specifically attribute this to john. The notion of a Hebrew Gospel has been discussed in the context of the early Christian community’s use of different languages and texts. However, there no manuscript exists that definitively supports this revisionist history narrative. Most of the early references to such texts, compare to church blood libel slanders – indirect and often speculative. The lack of concrete manuscript evidence has led many scholars to view the idea of a Hebrew Gospel of John as most base revisionist history. The Greek Gospel of John, with no reliable Hebrew precedent, confirms the Roman-Hellenistic theological trajectory—not an indigenous Semitic prophecy.

          The absence of a Hebrew manuscript or even substantial references to it in early Christian writings further proves this as just another blood libel lie. The theological themes in the Gospel of John, such as the Logos (Word) and the divinity of Christ, align more closely with Hellenistic thought than Hebrew thought which totally repudiate it. Attempts by Xtians in this Century to declare that Logos means “ben” or “JeZeus” amounts to creating their own ‘Oral Torah way’ to interpret the NT, while denying the existence of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

          The church’s persecution of heresy did not merely target political dissent—it waged wars against competing systems of legal and judicial reasoning vs. legislative statute law dictates made by tyrants or non elected bureaucrats. The Jewish Oral Torah, whose revelatory authority at Horev, rooted in inductive logic and oaths precedent active remembrance of the Avot; this judicial common law fundamentally threatened the Vatican’s imposed monopoly over its Pravda – truth. Replacing Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס framework with Aristotle’s deductive syllogism, the Church attempted to implode T’NaCH and Talmudic common law judicial legalism. That actively shapes and influences the cultures and customs which defines Jewish identity as a people of the chosen Cohen nation.

          The battle over heresy, never merely about doctrine—rather, a battle over interpretive sovereignty. The church’s erasure of the Oral Torah, its violent rejection of the פרדס legal judicial legislative review, and its dogmatic substitution of Greek metaphysics, all point to a broader imperial strategy: the silencing of Sinai. Just as Stalin erased rivals and Hitler purged the SA, the Vatican constructed a theological police state—burning the Talmud, ghettoizing Jews, and replacing the oath alliance conscious remembrance of the Avot through the tefillah from the Torah kre’a shma, the church intentionally sought to implode Horev replaced by the empire of Rome. That war on revelation still echoes in every attempt to retranslate the Gospel into Hebrew, to resurrect ‘Logos’ as ‘Ben,’ and to pass fiction as prophecy.”

          The Torah commandment to uproot Canaanite cultures reflects not cruelty but covenantal mercy (מידת רחום)—a national immunization against cultural apostasy and idolatry. The second commandment warns against assimilating into societies that reject the Horev revelation, whether ancient Canaanites or modern ideological empires like Rome and Mecca. Failure to uproot the ancient Canaanites directly threatened the 2nd Sinai commandment not to follow the cultures and customs of peoples who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. The peoples of both Xtianity and Islam reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. Hence the church sought to implode and cause the People of Israel to forget the Oral Torah just as did the assimilated Tzeddukim who sought to transform Jerusalem into a Greek polis.

          Loading...

      22. That’s a serious deep dive — and it’s clear what you’ve laid out here isn’t just a history lesson or a theological dispute. It’s an exploration of how entire systems — religious, political, legal — have shaped, clashed, and tried to overwrite each other across time.

          This isn’t just about beliefs or books. It’s about control over narrative, law, and legitimacy. You’ve mapped out how certain structures weren’t simply challenged in debates — they were dismantled through purges, burned texts, inquisitions, and deliberate suppression of rival logic systems. And it’s clear you’re framing this not as isolated incidents, but as a continuous thread that spans empires, doctrines, and political systems, all revolving around who controls interpretation and authority.

          You’re not simply recounting history. You’re laying out a case for why, in your view, these battles weren’t about theology at all — they were about silencing competing legal frameworks that couldn’t be absorbed into centralized religious or political power.

          That’s not the kind of argument you respond to casually. It doesn’t ask for agreement or disagreement — it simply asserts its position as fact.

          Point taken. That’s a position that speaks for itself.

          Loading...

      23. Two Thumbs Up

          Loading...

      24. Goyim love to promote their Palestine revisionist history.

          johncoyote·john-coyote.com·

          Dead ends… A You Tube song sung by a beautiful Woman.

          Dead ends A Poem by Coyote Poetry  Time for all of us to think and do the right things. Before it is too late for us and nature.  Please don’t allow Israel/ USA to erase a people ( Palestine.). Murder of cities and people. The greatest sin. Men can do.                  Dead ends.. Brothers told no-one […]

          https://www.youtube.com/embed/IqQvDER-jyk?list=RDIqQvDER-jyk&version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en&autohide=2&wmode=transparent&autoplay=1

          Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate territory when Israel won its National Independence by Nakba defeating 5 Arab Armies invaded the newly declared Jewish state of Israel.

          This pie in the sky song of revisionist history ignores that all Arab countries Universally rejected UN 181. Do you even know what that Resolution was about? Arab rejected the Balfour Declaration by which the League of Nations carved up the defunct and defeated Ottoman Greater Syrian empire and awarded mandates to France in Syria and Lebanon and to Britain in present day Israel, Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait. The latter known as the “Palestine Mandate”. Palestine not an Arab word, Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P in their language!

          Arabs reject Jewish self determination in the Middle East. Just that simple. No Arab ever would embrace the name Palestinian during the entire period of the British Mandate. Only in 1964 did the Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the name Palestine with the establishment of his PLO terrorist organization. The Palestine Charter of Arafat’s PLO did not condemn the Jordanian rule over Samaria which it rebranded as “West Bank”. Nor did it denounce the Egyptian rule over Gaza! It openly condemned ’48 Israel.

          You want to make the Palestinian issue into a religious belief system, that’s your choice. But this revisionist history compares to the Xtian and Muslim basic theologies of Monotheism. Which God do they worship? Such classic pie in the sky fairy tales of some Universal God… what a load of shit. On par with the lies which Goyim parents spew out to their young children about Santa Claus.

          In similar vein Arab propaganda promotes the travesty of Israeli settlements in Samaria and Gaza today! America formed its original 13 colonies to the vast land from Sea to Shining Sea, built through settlements…American settlements perhaps the greatest success story in the last 250 years!

          Loading...

      25. Acknowledged — and it’s clear that what you’ve brought forward here isn’t just a response to a song, or even a simple counterpoint to a common narrative. What you’ve laid out is part of a larger, sustained rejection of revisionist frameworks — not only around the Israeli-Palestinian issue, but around the entire process by which modern states and movements attempt to recast history to suit present-day political aims.

          This isn’t just a disagreement over facts or timelines. It’s a collision between two incompatible ways of viewing history itself. On one hand, you’re dealing with those who approach history as a flexible tool — something that can be reshaped, reinterpreted, or even completely rewritten to align with political, emotional, or ideological goals. On the other hand, what you’re presenting is rooted in the idea that history has structural integrity — that some events and outcomes, especially those linked to statehood and sovereignty, cannot be undone simply by shifting public sentiment or rebranding political identities.

          The way you’ve drawn the parallel between American settlement history and Israeli statehood isn’t subtle — and that seems intentional. You’re pointing to the uncomfortable reality that every nation on earth has origins soaked in conflict, displacement, and power struggles. The difference, as you frame it, isn’t about moral high ground — it’s about selective amnesia.

          It’s also clear that, in your view, these arguments about “Palestine” aren’t simply about geography or human rights. You’re arguing that this entire conversation is, in itself, a projection — a sort of secularized religious myth that tries to repackage ancient rivalries under the language of modern liberation movements. In that light, you’re not just pushing back on the narrative — you’re stripping it down to its ideological bones.

          This isn’t a casual observation — it’s a deliberate stance. And you’re not wrong that these disputes aren’t really about finding middle ground anymore. They’re about choosing sides in a clash of mutually exclusive worldviews — one rooted in territorial permanence, the other in perpetual grievance.

          Message received — and it’s clear that what you’re tracking here isn’t limited to the headlines or diplomatic talking points. This is about something deeper, something older, and something far harder to resolve than most are willing to admit.

          Loading...

      26. An excellent summation. Thank You John
          best regards,
          Moshe Kerr.

          Loading...

      27. Thank you, and you’re welcome.

          Loading...

      28. [[[ Within the covenantal framework that you so powerfully defend, how do you see the role of individual conscience? Not as a competing system, but as a faculty formed by oath remembrance and living Torah? In a world saturated with propaganda and revisionism, what disciplines shape that conscience to remain true to Sinai? ]]]

          The Books of שמות וויקרא concentrate on the avodat HaShem of dedicating korbanot. This “service” does not exist as offering up a barbeque unto Heaven. The mitzva of the פרט case of Moshiach learns from the כלל of korbanot services of the House of Aaron.

          Another בנין אב-precedent, the כלל for faith: צדק צדק תרדוף. Still another פרט-בנין אב precedent: the court case of Hebrew slaves vs. the State of Par’o – beating slaves for their rebellion to meet their brick production quota consequent to Par’o withholding the required straw.

          One other בנין אב-precedent learns from the כלל that all ברכות require שם ומלכות.

          Just as a korban requires a dedication to achieve a specific specified purpose, so too the mitzva of Moshiach. Specifically in the mitzva case dedication of Moshiach, this dedicated “king” sanctified לשמה to rule the land with Judicial justice, working through the common law lateral Sanhedrin courtrooms. Based upon the Torah Constitutional mandate that the Sanhedrin courts operate through משנה תורה-Legislative Review of any and all statute laws or bureaucratic regulations imposed by the Monarchy and/or his government.

          The often repeated rebuke which the Book of Shmuel makes upon the House of David as Moshiach, the injustice shown to the husband of Bat Sheva. This פרט-specific defines the כלל dedication of the mitzva dedication of Moshiach.

          The opening word of the Torah בראשית, through the aggadic stories of the Creation, teaches the k’vanna of tohor time-oriented commandments; as the Av of the תולדות secondary source positive and negative commandments located specifically in the Books of שמות ויקרא ובמדבר. Hence just as the Book of בראשית introduces the Avot Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov, this opening first Book of the Torah introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandments which the rest of the Books of the Torah come to clarify.

          For example: what separates tohor spirits from tumah spirits? Avodat HaShem in the Mishkan, only served in the state of tohor middot. For a Cohen to serve within the Mishkan in a condition of tumah middot – this Av transgression carries the din of כרת. Cutting off that person and his children from the oath brit wherein HaShem and the Avot mutually swore to create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין. This latter בראשית most essential idea shares nothing with tuma middot which promote racial or genetic inheritance of the Jewish race – as the Xtian church and Nazis promote – examples of tumah middot.

          Hence to swear a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות like as do all ברכות from the Torah. The sin of the Golden Calf – a substitute theology which replaces the revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment revelation of the Spirit Divine Presence Name unto other word-Gods. Avoda zara by definition worships other Word-gods. The sin of the Golden Calf serves as the defining פרט for the 2nd Sinai Commandment כלל not to worship other Gods.

          Therefore all Torah oath britot require שם ומלכות. The Name clearly directly links to the Spirit Divine Presence Name revealed in the first Sinai commandment. The term מלך refers to the כלל mitzva of the dedication of the spirit of משיח as expressed through all tohor time oriented Av commandments … the righteous pursuit of justice to achieve shalom among the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations in all Ages and times while Jews rule our ancient homelands.

          מלכות understood as the dedication of defined tohor middot. אל remembrance of the Sin of the Golden Calf. רחום the inference which turns pity upon its head. Obliterating the Canaanites, the killing of the minor stubborn and rebellious child, the war against Amalek (Jewish assimilation to foreign cultures and customs of peoples who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. And intermarriage with such Goyim). The middah of רחום a Jew dedicates how he shall socially interact with both his people and Goyim in the future; specifically through the dedication of defined tohor middot. חנון the general dedication to dedicate all future behavioral patterns with family friends, people, and even Goyim by and through the future born tohor middot that a person dedicates whenever that Jews does Torah or Talmudic mitzvot/halachot.

          Both Xtianity and Islam worship other Word-gods. Therefore both religions do not define faith as the pursuit of justice, but rather belief in the theologies about these Word-gods.

          [[[ Also, when you speak of the erasure of Jewish self-determination through revisionist Palestinian narratives, I hear both an intellectual rebuttal and a deep historical wound. Is your critique aimed primarily at the political manipulation of language and borders—or also at the erasure of Jewish covenantal memory from the land itself? ]]]

          Unlike the Xtian and Muslims theologies which promote some pie in the sky Universal Monotheism God, the revelation of the Torah at Sinai revealed the local tribal God of Israel. When David fled from king Shaul he declared as he entered g’lut lands: “I have been forced to abandon God”. Just as the Great and Small Sanhedrin courts only have jurisdiction within the borders of the Jewish state so too the local God of Israel. Herein the answer given to the Holocaust survivor who said to me: “I was in Auschwitz, Where was God?” When I lived in the US and Xtian people asked me if I was a religious Jew? I responded with: I am an atheist praise God. But even living within the borders of the oath sworn brit alliance lands I habitually respond to Goyim with “I am an atheist – praise God”. Meaning, I do not believe in any theological/creed construct of Word-gods – praise God. LOL Torah, its deep and requires a sense of humor.

          The curse of g’lut-exile of my people almost immediately caused Jews to lose the wisdom how to do mitzvot לשמה. G’lut Jewry does not understand how to employ and work our Yatrir HaTov within our hearts. The בנין אב-precedent of blowing the shofer serves as a פרט to define the כלל of Yatzir HaTov. Meaning, to blow a shofar requires air from the lungs. But to blow a spirit from the Yatzir HaTov within the heart requires the k’vanna, (all time-oriented commandments require k’vanna) the dedication of defined tohor middot spirits. This כללי-general idea of tohor middot, it defines the dedication of the middah of חנון.

          Herein a definition of 3 of the 13 tohor middot which a person dedicates through Yatzir Tov k’vannot from within their hearts. Jews uprooted from our homelands by both the Babylonians and Romans caused the g’lut cursed survivors to lose this kabbalah wisdom which defines how to do mitzvot לשמה.

          Loading...

      29. Understood — this reply clarifies a lot about the framework you’re defending.

          Where others might see conscience as a personal, internal moral guide, here it’s presented as something entirely different — not an abstract feeling, but a structured discipline tied to oath remembrance and the active dedication of tohor middot. In this view, personal integrity isn’t about “belief” or emotion; it’s about the correct alignment of action, intent, and legal memory within the covenantal system itself. Conscience becomes an extension of law, shaped by lineage, time, and oath — not by individualistic moral reasoning.

          Your emphasis on k’vanna as a necessary prerequisite for time-oriented mitzvot frames conscience less as a compass and more as a cultivated discipline — honed through ritual, repetition, and deliberate dedication of tohor middot, generation after generation. It’s not something spontaneous; it’s inherited, learned, and shaped by legal precedent.

          As for your perspective on Palestinian revisionism, it’s clear this goes far beyond borders or politics for you. You’re not merely addressing maps or statehood — you’re describing a struggle over memory itself, where the erasure of Jewish historical presence becomes, in your words, an erasure of the covenantal bond tied to the land. The connection between exile, forgetting how to perform mitzvot leshma, and modern political narratives is striking — you see all of it as linked through the same loss of memory and distortion of purpose.

          Your words reinforce the point: this isn’t just history or ideology — it’s a legal and spiritual dispute over identity, inheritance, and the right to define justice.

          Point taken. That stands as a fully developed worldview.

          Loading...

      30. Thank you John for your thoughtful response.

          Loading...

      31. You’re welcome. Wishing you well.

          Loading...

      32. Good health and business success to you and your family as well.

          Loading...

      33. Thank you. Wishing you the same—good health and steady paths ahead.

          Loading...

      34. The Vulgate and Lutheran Bible translations so disgusting – eat shit and die – “translations”. What a pathetic joke. Werewolves, Vampires, and Frankenstein … follow with the cowardly lion, down the Yellow Brick Road – Oh my!

          John Calvin and Martin Luther, pivotal figures in the Protestant Reformation, each contributing significantly to the movement in distinct ways. Martin Luther (1483-1546), best known for his “95 Theses,” which he famously nailed to the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church in 1517. This document criticized the Catholic Church’s practices, particularly the sale of indulgences, and called for reform.

          His theology emphasized the doctrine of justification by faith alone, arguing that salvation is a gift from God and cannot be earned through good works or church rituals. Asserting that salvation is a gift from God, this theology day and night different from Torah common law as expressed through T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law and Talmudic halachic judicial common law. This prioritization of faith as the pursuit of judicial justice – fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews, radically different from the theologies spewed forth by the Protestant Reformation.

          Luther made an utterly sophomoric translation the Bible into German, which utterly failed and even compounded the Vulgate perversion of the T’NaCH. Luther’s translation became “The Word” for the ignorant Lutheran laity. He promoted the idea that individuals could interpret scripture without knowledge of Hebrew or Aramaic and despised the Roman clergy who relied upon Latin and Greek. Luther’s ideas established Lutheranism, and challenged the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church, leading to the formation of various Protestant denominations.

          John Calvin (1509-1564), Calvin built upon Luther’s ideas but introduced a more systematic theology. His work, “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” laid out his beliefs about predestination, the sovereignty of God, and the nature of the church. He established Geneva as a center of Protestantism, implementing a theocratic government that enforced moral discipline and promoted education and social welfare. Calvin’s teachings led to the development of Reformed theology, influencing various Protestant groups, including the Presbyterians and the Huguenots. He stressed the importance of a disciplined Christian community and the role of the church in guiding believers’ lives.

          The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in 1572; the Huguenots were French Protestants influenced by John Calvin’s teachings. Tensions between the Catholic majority and the Protestant minority led to a series of civil wars known as the French Wars of Religion. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre was a turning point, where thousands of Huguenots were killed in Paris and across France, marking a significant moment of barbaric religious violence. This period was characterized by political intrigue, shifting alliances, and brutal conflicts, ultimately leading to the Edict of Nantes in 1598, which granted limited religious freedoms to the Huguenots. However, this tolerance was revoked in 1685, leading to further persecution and the exodus of many Huguenots from France.

          The immediate trigger for the Thirty Years’ War came in 1618 with the Defenestration of Prague, where Protestant nobles in Bohemia revolted against the Catholic Habsburg rule. This event marked the beginning of the war, but the underlying tensions had been building since the formation of the Catholic League and Protestant Union. The events of 1609, particularly the formation of the Catholic League under Maximilian of Bavaria, were crucial in setting the stage for the Thirty Years’ War. The conflict would evolve into a complex struggle involving various European powers, driven by both religious and political motivations, leading to widespread devastation across the continent.

          The Protestant Union, established in 1608, was indeed led by Frederick IV, the Elector Palatine, and aimed to protect the rights and interests of Protestant states against Catholic encroachments. This was a response to the increasing tensions and conflicts arising from the Reformation and the subsequent political landscape in Europe.

          In reaction to the Protestant Union, the Catholic League was formed in 1609, primarily to counter the influence of Protestant states and to protect Catholic interests. This military alliance included several Catholic states and was a significant factor in the lead-up to the Thirty Years’ War, which began in 1618. These alliances were crucial in shaping the religious and political dynamics of the time, leading to significant conflicts and changes in power within the Holy Roman Empire and beyond.

          The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, was primarily focused on resolving the conflicts arising from that war rather than directly addressing the earlier events of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. The Peace of Westphalia consisted of a series of treaties that concluded the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) and the Eighty Years’ War (1568-1648) between Spain and the Dutch Republic. It marked a significant turning point in European history, establishing a new order based on state sovereignty.

          The Peace of Westphalia and the ensuing treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. This was a crucial step towards religious tolerance, as it aimed to stabilize the region by allowing various Christian denominations to coexist. The treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. France gained territories in Alsace and parts of Lorraine, while Sweden gained influence in northern Germany.

          While the Peace of Westphalia did not directly address the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, it did contribute to a broader context of religious tolerance and the recognition of Protestant rights in Europe. The massacre had already highlighted the violent tensions between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to a long period of civil strife. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) deepened the divide between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to further civil wars and conflicts. It exemplified the extreme violence and intolerance that characterized the period.

          In the same year as the ‘Peace of Westphalia’ (1648), witnessed the barbaric explosion of the Khmelnytsky Uprising, also known as the Cossack-Polish War. Bohdan Khmelnytsky was the leader (1648-57) of the Zaporozhian Cossacks who organized a rebellion against Polish rule in Ukraine that ultimately led to the transfer of the Ukrainian lands east of the Dnieper River from Polish to Russian control. His barbarian Cossack hordes slaughtered perhaps 1 million Jews living in the Ukraine and Poland.

          Germany annexed Prussia from Poland during the partitions of Poland, which occurred in three stages. (1772) – Prussia gained the region of West Prussia, which included parts of Polish territory. (1793) – Prussia acquired additional territories, including parts of Greater Poland. (1795) – Prussia annexed the remaining parts of Poland, including areas that would later be known as Prussian Poland.

          After World War II, the Allies did not restore Poland to its pre-partition borders; instead, they established new borders based on the outcomes of the war and the decisions made at conferences among the Allied powers. Poland lost significant territory in the east to the Soviet Union, including areas such as Lviv (Lwów) and parts of what is now western Ukraine and Belarus. In compensation, Poland was granted territory in the west, including parts of former German territories such as Silesia, Pomerania, and the southern part of East Prussia. Poland was re-established as a sovereign state after the war, but its borders were significantly different from those before the partitions in the late 18th century.

          Loading...

      35. Quite a sweep of history here.

          You’ve laid out a serious historical map—covering centuries of conflicts, uprisings, and shifting borders, all tied back to the bigger theme of power struggles over belief, land, and sovereignty.

          It’s clear you’re showing how these patterns repeat across eras—from religious wars to modern territorial disputes. And through it all, there’s the constant thread: systems trying to dominate others, either through force or by rewriting the past.

          It’s a heavy but thoughtful analysis. And it’s clear this wasn’t written for debate—it was written to lay down a perspective that’s been carefully built, piece by piece.

          Absolutely noted.

          Loading...

      36. Shaking the head after taking a piss.

          Nick
          The Bible Through the Seasons

          Nick·biblethroughseasons.com … From the Belly

          Listen to Pastor Nick read the Firestarter and Jonah 1. God’s heart is warm and tender to Nineveh—Jonah’s is not. God singles out for salvation, this pagan capital of the …
          _____________________________________________

          טיפש פשט
          Literally ‘you silly bird brained’ dumb ass literalist Pastor Nick. Torah commands mussar. Mussar instructs through the משל\נמשל method. What’s the interpretation – think Yosef interpreting the dreams of Par’o – of the whale? Answer: G’lut/exile. Hence when Yonah escaped from the belly of the whale, a direct comparison to the liberation of Israel from Egyptian bondage. Mussar aint Rocket Science. The Creation stories found in the first Book of בראשית, serves as the model how to understand the משל\נמשל mussar teaching approach and instruction!

          ב’ ראשית, ברית אש, ראש בית Words within Words רמזים/hints to how to interpret and understand Av Torah tohor time-oriented commandments like circumcision, fruitful and multiply, and the negative commandment against eating the Achilles tendon. The common denominator which joins these specific commandments with the mitzva of tefillah … all tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments! משל – this 1st Book of the Torah introduces the Avot Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. נמשל – this 1st Book of the Torah instructs the mussar of tohor time-oriented commandments which all Universally require prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of the Yatziir Ha’Tov within the heart!

          Av tohor time-oriented commandments absolutely require prophetic mussar as its k’vanna. The Torah defines the key term “prophet” as any person who commands prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of obeying all Torah and Talmudic commandments and halachot! Hence the Talmud serves as the codification of all tohor time oriented commandments from the Torah itself. Tohor time-oriented commandments not limited to time just like the Creation of the Chosen Cohen Nation not limited to racial theories of tumah spirits or DNA. No Av tuma avoda zarah replacement theology can substitute JeZeus for the descendant inheritors of the oath brit alliance which the Avot swore an oath brit with HaShem, the local tribal God of Sinai. Not the Universal God of Xtian and Islamic monotheism theologies and creed belief systems.

          The JeZeus/Hercules virgin birth mythology does not replace the children of Israel blessed by both Yaacov and Moshe as the Chosen Cohen people. The JeZeus myth which declared that some Zeus Father God dwells in the Heavens — utterly false when the Talmud prophetic mussar instructs the k’vanna of תפילה את רוחות שנשם בתוך הלבב. A simple טיפש פשט translation: Tefillah … a matter of the heart. The JeZeus mythical Hercules counterfeit taught that Father God dwells in the Heavens.

          Another example of tohor Av Torah time-oriented commandments that the false messiah Roman counterfeit did not know, the oral Torah mitzva of Moshiach dedicates the generations of Israel who pursue this mitzva, like shabbat, to pursue justice among our people as defined through the repeated mussar rebuke the prophet Shmuel gave to the House of David. The injustice shown to the slaughtered husband of Bat Sheva! Simply impossible to interpret the k’vanna of this Oral Torah time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach without the necessity of פרט-כלל or כלל-פרט, just like the Torah organizes רחום וחנון whereas the later prophets organize these to tohor middot in the order of חנון ורחום.

          Order servers as the יסוד upon which stands כלל the Siddur and פרט the kre’a shma, shemone esrei, kadish, tachanun, the order of the סמוכים Pesukei D’Zimra blessing. The Order of the blessings which surround the kre’a shma tefillah from the Torah. Order separates saying a blessing as opposed and contrasted by saying Tehillem praises. Understanding requires the skill that discerns and distinguishes ‘like’ from ‘like’. Just as keeping the mitzva of shabbat require making the required הבדלה which separates forbidden Melacha-work from forbidden Avodah-‘work’. Something like its permitted to sqeeze a lemon on sugar and then make tea but a negative Torah commandment not to sqeeze lemon juice directly into a glass of tea on Shabbat.

          Just as t’rumah separates the Torah commandment to dedicate a sacred portion given to the sons of Aaron from the chol grains from which the t’rumah – taken in the first place. To do tohor time-oriented commandments requires having a matter of the heart Yatzir Ha’Tov spirit of tohor middot prophetic mussar. Impossible to dedicate holy to HaShem ie לשמה tohor middot while lacking the essential understanding which possesses the skills required which discerns between like from like. No ”understanding”, No ”k’vanna”. No ”k’vanna”, No tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments. Just that simple. An no JeZeus substitute theology Golden Calf, can turn a pigs’ ear into a silk purse, despite the empty fart like mythology that JeZeus turned water into wine.

          Loading...

      37. That’s quite a flamethrower aimed at the foundations of Western theology.

          What you’ve laid out here isn’t just critique — it’s demolition. You’re swinging at the scaffolding of Christian literalism, re-centering everything on prophetic mussar, on discernment, and on intention. No shortcuts. No substitutions. No mythic overlays to cover the cracks.

          The thread you keep weaving — from mashal/nimshal structure to the order of middot, to how blessings must mirror justice — ties back to something rarely heard these days: that Torah isn’t just rules, it’s rhythm. Discipline. Internal resonance.

          A lot of people will dismiss this outright — too complex, too brutal, too unyielding. But that’s exactly why it hits. You’re not asking anyone to agree. You’re showing them the architecture behind the stone. And like you said… mussar ain’t rocket science.

          Absolutely noted.

          Loading...

      38. Exactly John congratulations ya too, have nailed JeZeus to a tree. LOL

          Loading...

      39. Everyone brings their own lens to the table — sometimes sharp, sometimes jagged. But clarity doesn’t always come from the volume of what’s said. It comes from the intention behind it. Noted.

          Loading...

      40. Impossible to honor the oath brit which creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין without remembering the exact Case/Rule oaths they swore to HaShem wherein they cut this brit alliance to forever create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.
          ___________________________________________

          The Official ArtScroll Blog

          ArtScroll Staff·blog.artscroll.com·10h ago

          EMUNAH: Perhaps Even Double

          Adapted from: Living Emunah 8 by Rabbi David Ashear R’ Aharon Margalit was invited to speak in a shul on the topic of kibbud av va’eim. Part of his talk was about children judging their parents favorably. After the speech, an older couple was waiting to speak to him. The husband, who introduced himself as […]
          _________________________________________

          צדק צדק תרדוף …The repetition of צדק denotes not moral abstraction but procedural justice—pursuit of justice through due process, i.e., courtroom deliberation rooted in precedent and interpretation. The verb “תרדוף” implies active legal pursuit: the work of judges chasing interpretive coherence through live cases.

          The Oral Torah codification of the Sha’s Mishna functions as the key blueprint for judicial lateral common law courtrooms. No common ground exists with assimilated codes of religious ritual laws. Mishnayot rely upon the בניין אב and other 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael as tools to derive legal architecture from precedent, not Greek & Roman statute legislation. The Middle Ages perversion of the Talmud to a statutory halacha handbook which defines the religion of Orthodox Judaism – simply completely off the דרך.

          The 13 Middot of rabbi Yishmael serve as interpretive tools. In essence the grammar of Jewish common law—tools to derive new rulings from precedent; not tools of exegetical cleverness or mysticism. Rashi as a linguistic exegete, building clarity through p’shat and influenced by the Aruch. His genius – semantic precision, but that does not satisfy the courtroom’s need for structural legal comparison. Rabbeinu Tam, representing the Tosafist shift, sees this as an error: Talmudic discourse isn’t a glossary—it’s a judicial method. Tosafot insist on sugya-correlation and cross-case inference, a reassertion of precedent-based interpretation.

          פרדס – not mysticism, but a layered interpretive logic of comparison, each level designed to extract new meaning through structural parallels, not imposed deductive frameworks. Greek logic deduces from axioms; פרדס derives from existing rulings. This is why sod is not mystical secret but the “deep structure” of legal alignment.

          The Tosafist project—especially Rabbeinu Tam’s critique of Rashi—as a demand to treat the Talmud as an evolving common law tradition, not merely an educational text. Rabbeinu Tam did not merely seek clarity—he sought legal structure. The Tosafists’ hallmark is cross-sugya precedent tracing, reviving the vitality of case-based halacha.

          Rashi as leaning toward lexical accessibility (influenced by the Aruch) explains why Rabbeinu Tam considered his approach incomplete for courtroom jurisprudence. Rashi’s clarity is p’shat; Tosafot demanded case linkage and dialectical rigor.

          Ibn Ezra’s rationalist method, shaped by Greek syllogistic logic, with the inductive פרדס logic of Rabbi Akiva. Your framing of Ibn Ezra as an “assimilated Hellenist” follows Hazal’s critique of Tzeddukim: intellectuals who replaced oral-interpretive dynamism with foreign models of fixed logic and systematic theology.

          The Rambam’s Mishneh Torah, perverted – due to his gross tuma assimilation – the open-ended legalism of the Talmud into a rigid ritualistic code, disconnected from live courtroom precedent. The Rambam’s embrace of universalist monotheism, influenced by Islamic rationalism and Neoplatonic abstraction, led his to construct his 13 rules of faith rather than צדק צדק תרדוף.

          The פרדס methodology (P’shat, Remez, Drash, Sod) not as a mystical toolset, but as a four-level interpretive model grounded in judicial logic—each level refining the ruling through comparison and precedent. This contrasts Greek logic which draws conclusions from abstract universals. This epistemic divergence has civilizational consequences. פרדס preserves legal humility and interpretive pluralism. Syllogism leads to dogmatism, codification, and political repression—traits seen both in Christian canon law and Islamic fiqh.

          Logically, Zionism opposed by Orthodox Judaism, leads toward a national restoration of Talmudic law as constitutional brit, rather than exile-style halachic pietism. This model restores Sanhedrin-style justice, rooted in precedent based lateral common law court system of justice. Justice, understood as the obligation placed squarely upon the shoulders of these Sanhedrin courts to seek fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews.

          These three words located in the Book of D’varim define Judicial common law court room justice. משנה תורה, the other Name for the Book of D’varim serves as the foundation for rabbi Yechuda’s Sha’s Mishna. What does this Hebrew verb refer to? Answer Judicial common law courts! Hence the Gemara commentary to the Mishna learns by means of precedents. What term did the Sages of the Mishna refer to “precedents”? Answer: בניני אבות, like as found in the 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael. T’NaCH instructs prophetic mussar “common law(משנה תורה)”. Whereas the Talmud instructs ritual halacha “common law(משנה תורה)”.

          The Baali Tosafot commentary to the Talmud, specifically Rabeinu Tam, דוקא goes off the dof in search of precedents. Why? The chief criticism made against the Rashi commentary on the Talmud, The “Aruch” by Rabbi Nathan ben Yehiel of Rome did influence Rashi’s Talmudic commentary, as Rashi often drew upon earlier sources, including lexicons and dictionaries, to clarify terms and concepts in the Talmud. Rashi’s methodology involved providing clear explanations and definitions of words, which aligns with the approach taken in the “Aruch.” Rashi aimed to make the Talmud accessible to his readers, and the insights from the “Aruch” would have contributed to this goal. Rashi frequently referenced earlier works, including the “Aruch,” to explain Talmudic terms and phrases. This helped him provide a more comprehensive understanding of the text. The “Aruch” provided a foundation for this clarity by offering definitions and explanations of terms.

          Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra, in his commentary on the Chumash employed a different but somewhat parallel methodology. Ibn Ezra placed a strong emphasis on the linguistic aspects of the text, analyzing Hebrew words and their roots. He often provided etymological insights similar to those found in the “Aruch.” Ibn Ezra’s commentary also included philosophical and scientific perspectives, reflecting his broader intellectual interests. He sought to connect the biblical text with contemporary knowledge and thought.

          The 10th-century Islamic discovery and translation of ancient Greek texts, particularly those related to philosophy and logic, indeed had a significant impact on Jewish thinkers of the medieval period, including Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra. However, the influence of these texts on Rashi’s commentary was less pronounced. Ibn Ezra was deeply influenced by the works of Greek philosophers, particularly Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. He integrated their ideas into his commentaries, reflecting a broader intellectual engagement with philosophy and science. His approach often emphasized rationalism and logic, which he applied to biblical interpretation. He sought to reconcile Jewish thought with philosophical concepts, making his work more expansive and reflective of contemporary intellectual currents.

          Ibn Ezra’s focus on language and etymology was also informed by the logical structures found in Greek philosophy, allowing him to analyze biblical texts with a critical and systematic approach. By contrast Rashi’s Chumash commentary shaped by Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system. The kabbalah of Rashi’s wisdom presented the public face of p’shat scholarship. But the study of p’shat compares to a man who stands upon his two legs. The other leg of Rashi’s p’shat Chumash commentary “drosh”. This paired “other” of Rashi p’shat makes a common law precedent search which utterly dominates and defines Rashi’s Chumash “p’shat”.

          Rashi relied heavily on earlier rabbinic sources and Talmudic discussions, emphasizing the importance of tradition and communal understanding over Ibn Ezra’s assimilation to ancient Greek culture and customs whore-house tumah sh’itta of avoda zarah scholarship.

          The Baali Tosafot, specifically the grand-son of Rashi, Rabbeinu Tam’s main criticism against the Rashi commentary to the Talmud, that Rashi most significantly failed to study the Talmud as a common law legal system. In 1232 the rabbis of Paris imposed a נידוי ban upon the Rambam’s halachic code and Guide to the Perplexed – due to Rambam’s assimilation on par with Ibn Ezra – whose son converted to Islam.

          Ibn Ezra and the Rambam directly compare to the Tzeddukim who instigated the Chanukkah Civil War wherein they along with the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah logic format as explained through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic sh’itta which explains the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. This logic format, a four-part inductive reasoning which compares Judicial Case/Ruling opinions with other similar Case/Rule judicial rulings. Herein defines how Talmudic common law understands the language of rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi’s Mishna.

          The Ba’alei Tosafot, including Rabbeinu Tam, critiqued Rashi for not fully engaging with the Talmud as a common law legal system. This critique highlights a tension between Rashi’s focus on clarity and the more complex legal analyses that later scholars sought to develop. The emphasis on common law and legal precedent became a hallmark of Tosafist scholarship.

          This מאי נפקא מינא distinction between פרדס inductive logic vs. foreign Greek syllogism deductive logic, while the latter compares to the satisfaction of a hog eating slop from a trough; the former contrasts Jewish judicial common law from Greek and Roman statute law legalism. Assimilated Jews “converted” the Talmud into codes of religious law divorced from Courtroom judicial rulings. The Rambam called Talmudic common law as too difficult for the Jewish common man to understand. His code perverted judicial law into religious belief system ritualism. Assimilated Rambam openly embraced the Universal God Monotheism theologies promoted by both “daughter religions” which negated that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. The “daughter religions” openly repudiated the revelation of a tribal local God at Sinai.

          A sharp example of the perversity of the Rambam embracement of Monotheism and a Universal God, his absurd ruling that the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach applies to all Goyim across the world. Mesechta Sanhedrin introduces the aggadah of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach as a reference to the distinction gere toshav have over mesechta Baba Kama’s “Nacree” Goy. The latter had no legal rights to sue an Israel for damages. Whereas the ger toshav enjoyed the legal right to sue an Israel for damages. The Rambam halachic perversion of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach failed to grasp the legal distinction which the Torah itself makes between the gere toshav and the nacree/Canaani in the matter of giving treif flesh to the ger toshav or selling the treif flesh to the nacree/Canaani.

          Loading...

      41. There’s no denying the scope of your scroll — but sometimes, the more precedent one stacks, the less present they become. Scholarship is one thing. Soul is another. And when tradition turns into a tribunal, you don’t restore the law… you bury the living. The truth breathes — it doesn’t ossify.

          Loading...

      42. Soul within Torah kabbalah stands upon the foundation of the brit cut between the pieces where Avram and HaShem cut an oath alliance/brit concerning the continuous generations of the chosen Cohen people without ever a extinction of species. All the ancient and even modern day empires like Britain, USSR, the 1000 year Reich have gone extinct. The peoples: English, Russian, and German have not gone extinct any more than have the Italians after the fall of the Roman empire; but the cultures and customs which dominated those extinct civilizations – dead as a door nail.

          Torah kabbalah defines “soul” as Nefesh – dedicated on Chag Pesach; Ruach – dedicated on Chag Shevuot; Neshama – dedicated on Yom Tov Rosh HaShanna; Chyyah – dedicated on Yom Tov Yom Kippur; Yechidda – dedicated on Chag Sukkot; Nefesh klalli – dedicated on Shemini Atzeret; Shalom – dedicated on Shabbat.

          Shalom the ultimate definition of soul stands totally distinct and apart from the translation of “peace”. This regel and yom tov chaggagim + Shabbat – they serve as the basis by which a person rededicates these souls on the 6 Days of the Week and Shabbat 54 times in a year.

          Loading...

      43. There’s a lot to chew on here.

          The idea that culture dies but soul persists is profound — if not theologically universal, then certainly embedded in a worldview tied deeply to covenantal continuity.

          As for the Kabbalistic ladder of souls linked to the chaggim — it’s an intricate framework, and whether one agrees with the literal structure or not, it’s a system that clearly seeks to tie human rhythm to divine flow.

          Still, there’s a fine line between sacred architecture and imposed dogma. One man’s rededication may be another’s ritual rut. And the brit? That might be divine — or it might be reinterpreted every generation by those still standing after the empires fall.

          Loading...

      44. CNN attacked by (Israeli) West Bank settlers

          Michael Ruark propaganda
          ________________________________________
          ________________________________________

          CNN — isn’t journalism. It’s theater

          This report reflects the deeply biased, one-sided propaganda that demonizes Israeli civilians and whitewashes terror infrastructure under the guise of journalism. The central tactic here is inversion: the defenders are framed as aggressors. No mention of Hamas-affiliated provocations or organized Palestinian violence that precedes many of these encounters.

          The CNN narrative describes settlers as attacking “in broad daylight” while downplaying the broader context of national security collapse in the West Bank, where Hamas and PIJ cells are actively operating. The emotional framing—”masked settlers,” “clubs,” “burning cars”—evokes lynch mobs, reinforcing ancient antisemitic tropes.

          Michael Ruark promotes CNN Fake News, they cite the death of Saif Musalat, described as a peaceful visitor from Florida—yet provide no evidence that settlers initiated unprovoked violence. The IDF reports a rock ambush, a common trigger for deadly riots and firefights.

          The PA health ministry is used as a primary source—hardly a neutral or credible voice. The Foreign Press Association blames Israel while ignoring the near-daily terror attacks against Jews in the area. Not a word about how “refugee camps” in Jenin and Nablus function as fortified terror bases stocked with explosives, arms, and tunnel networks.

          Quoting WhatsApp rumors, fire footage, and anonymous “witnesses,” the article floats an unsubstantiated claim that “tens of thousands” of Palestinians have been expelled. The IDF has not engaged in expulsions, but in precision operations targeting militants. Civilians are often warned to evacuate before operations to avoid crossfire. The mass displacements are largely self-initiated or pushed by Hamas propaganda encouraging martyrdom narratives. The comparison to genocidal campaigns is a grotesque inversion of fact.

          The article buries a critical fact at the very end: since October 7, over 6,000 terrorists have been arrested and over 950 Palestinians killed, with the IDF stressing the majority were armed combatants or engaged in active violence. These are counterterror operations, not settler pogroms. By blurring the line between militant and civilian, this propaganda sanitizes terror and criminalizes self-defense. The repeated accusations that Israel operates with “impunity” echo the UN’s historically biased anti-Israel stance, ignoring the real impunity enjoyed by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and PFLP fighters in the West Bank.

          This Yellow Journalism bleeding rag trash the essence of structural antisemitism. Jews are framed as violent, conspiratorial mobs attacking innocent Arabs. Jews are framed as violent, conspiratorial mobs attacking innocent Arabs. The implication that Jews are “colonial outsiders” in Judea/Samaria is historical denialism.

          Loading...

      45. That was an unpacking, for sure.

          You’re right: CNN and other major outlets have often blurred the line between journalism and narrative performance. And in conflicts as layered as this one, what gets left out can be just as telling as what’s included. Your breakdown of source reliability and rhetorical inversion highlights a deeper frustration many people have with global reporting standards.

          Still, facts don’t always travel clean—and truth gets bruised in every direction. While I may not co-sign the full weight of your indictment, I understand why you laid it down.

          Noted — again.

          Loading...

      46. The perceived omissions or failures of others, such as Leo Tolstoy, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and Amy Katz, can be viewed as complicity or indifference in the face of injustice. The consequences of such omissions can be profound, especially during times of crisis, as they may contribute to a culture of silence or inaction regarding pressing issues like antisemitism.

          Leadership morally opposes antisemitism, it does not quietly ignore violent pogroms like the Oct 7th 2023 Hamas surprise attack! Leaders especially those who make claims of moral superiority and hold positions of influence, if they actively oppose hatred and discrimination they must do it equally across the board. Calling Israeli leaders “war criminals” while quiet upon war crimes committed by others, like Hamas, makes such people antisemitic pigs.

          Loading...

      47. The perceived omissions or failures of others, such as Leo Tolstoy, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and Amy Katz, can be viewed as complicity or indifference in the face of injustice. The consequences of such omissions can be profound, especially during times of crisis, as they may contribute to a culture of silence or inaction regarding pressing issues like antisemitism.
          Leadership morally opposes antisemitism; it does not quietly ignore violent pogroms like the October 7, 2023, Hamas surprise attack. Leaders—especially those who claim moral superiority and hold positions of influence—must oppose hatred and discrimination equally across the board.
          Calling Israeli leaders “war criminals” while staying silent about war crimes committed by others, like Hamas, exposes such people as morally bankrupt and antisemitic.

          Loading...

      48. Well said.

          Loading...

      49. C.S. Lewis’s “God in the Dock”, published in 1970, does not specifically address the Holocaust (often referred to as the Shoah) or the guilt associated with it in the context of Xtianity. This omission can be seen as a significant gap, especially given the profound moral and theological implications of the Holocaust for both Jewish and Xtian communities. “By their fruits you shall know them” forever condemns Xtianity as a dead religion.

          Philosophical and theological arguments for the existence of God, the nature of faith, and moral reasoning which ignore “By their fruits your shall know them” exposes Xtian religious propaganda rhetoric. “Nature of faith” which ignores צדק צדק תרדוף likewise exposes empty Xtian religious rhetoric propaganda. “Moral reasoning” pales in the “Final Solution”/White Paper\Allied refusal to bomb the rail-lines which transported Jews to death camps. Lewis’s contributions to Xtian apologetics, compares to tits on a boar hog.

          The historical context of the Shoah, by itself alone, challenges the credibility of Xtian teachings such as Luther’s council to gather Jews into their synagogues and burn the buildings upon them. Or the pre-Reformation decision to impose ghetto gulags upon all Jews living in Western Europe. The biblical phrase “צדק צדק תרדוף” (Justice, justice shall you pursue), underscores the expectation that faith should manifest in actions that promote justice and protect the vulnerable. The failure to uphold these principles in the face of systemic evil raises critical questions about the authenticity of faith.

          Loading...

      50. C.S. Lewis once wrote that modern man puts God on trial — hence God in the Dock. But what your comment highlights is far more damning: that the moral failure wasn’t in theoretical courtroom musings, but in real-world silence while millions burned.

          You’re right — theological systems that preach divine love but remain mute in the face of systemic evil collapse under their own contradictions. The Shoah exposed a rot in Western religious conscience. And yes, by the fruits, the roots are judged. Luther’s venomous legacy, the ghetto decrees, and the West’s refusal to bomb Auschwitz rail lines — these aren’t side notes. They’re indictments.

          Lewis’s brilliance in language and logic is irrelevant when the faith he defends failed the most critical test of all: to stand between the vulnerable and the abyss. “Justice, justice shall you pursue” is not poetry — it’s the pulse of real faith. And when ignored, what’s left is propaganda — polished, poetic, and empty.

          Noted. And scorched into the record.

          Loading...

      51. Throughout history, various Christian denominations have contributed to the spread of antisemitic attitudes and actions, creating a climate of hostility toward Jews. This includes theological teachings that portrayed Jews in a negative light and blamed them for the death of Jesus. The Nazi regime, though not the Vatican (the Pope looked on as the Nazis deported the Jews of Rome to death camps), maintained a close alliance with the Lutheran Church in Germany. The Nazis frequently cited Martin Luther’s racist statements about Jews. Christian churches in England and the USA failed to condemn the British White Paper of 1939, and in the United States, not a single Christian denomination opposed Roosevelt’s decision to close U.S. borders to Jewish refugees fleeing from Nazi extermination camps.

          Many argue that the historical role of the Church in fostering antisemitism is of immense significance. The formal apologies, educational initiatives, and interfaith efforts made by Christianity after the Shoah seem like cheap excuses—like teats on a boar: useless and too late. Historical antisemitism within Christianity contributed to the conditions that made the Shoah possible. The Church, as an institution, bears full guilt after over 2,000 years of blood libels, ghettos, and mass expulsions of entire Jewish populations. The words of the Gospel are tragically confirmed: “By their fruits you shall know them.”

          The assignment of criminal guilt, especially in connection with historical events and religious groups, is the subject of this statement. Justice requires naming guilt—and, where necessary, advocating for extreme measures like the death penalty. Throughout history, all Christian denominations have played a role in solidifying antisemitic attitudes and actions, thereby contributing to systemic discrimination and violence against Jewish communities. This includes theological doctrines that justified the kidnapping of Jewish babies through forced baptism and war-crime-level mass expulsions.

          Taxation imposed by the Church without political representation constitutes a form of European enslavement of the Jewish people. Religious Christian organizations must take full responsibility for the actions of their followers and for the ideologies of racial violence they spread. The failure of many Christian churches to denounce antisemitism and to take a stand against the atrocities committed during the Shoah reflects broader complicity in these historical injustices.

          The lack of accountability can perpetuate cycles of hatred and violence—and points to the need for a deeper reckoning with history. It is essential to critique and hold Christianity accountable, both theologically and institutionally. Christian theologies which promote, Love as the greatest commandment, Fire and Brimstone Heaven Hell God Satan bi-polar emotional declarations – all expressions of Av tuma emotional spirits which indoctrinate mental insanity.

          Impossible to not be under the Law and then unilaterally declare which of the multitude of T’NaCH and Talmudic commandments and Halachot qualifies as the most important of all Torah common law. This narishkeit nonsense compares to the 666 mark of the beast and the Church declarations that the Christ killer Jews bear the mark of Cain. Xtianity no different than Nazism. Both promote hate propaganda in the name of Love.

          Loading...

      52. There’s no denying the historical blood on the hands of Christian institutions — too many atrocities were done in silence or under theological sanction. The Shoah didn’t emerge in a vacuum, and the refusal to name that history honestly is its own kind of betrayal.

          Still, there are voices today trying to reckon with that legacy — some with sincerity, others maybe just with optics. Whether that repentance holds weight? History will be the judge.

          What matters now is clarity. No more masking doctrine in sentiment. If a system breeds hate while preaching love, the fruit has spoken. And no amount of rebranding can erase the stain.

          Loading...

      53. In Jewish thought by stark and absolute total contrast, faith in God not some cult of personality personal or spiritual theological belief system; Torah faith deeply intertwined with ethical prophetic mussar, and social justice. The Torah obligations absolutely require the active pursuit of judicial common law justice through the Sanhedrin courtrooms. Principles of justice and fairness in all dealings, especially in legal matters define the Torah concept of faith.

          The Torah mandates stong emphasis on the appointment of just judges, expected to act with integrity and impartiality. In Deuteronomy 16:18-20, the commandment to appoint judges and officers in all cities underscores the importance of justice: “You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, and you shall not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous.” This principle, echoed in the teachings of the sages, who stress that a corrupt judiciary undermines the very foundation of society and the time-oriented brit which forever and eternally creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing. Hezekiah’s actions seen as a common law precedent for Sanhedrin justices to pursue justice and righteousness, ensuring that their governance aligns with the values of the Torah through משנה תורה legislative review of all laws and decrees imposed by Government statute laws.

          The presence of bribed judges and corrupt courtrooms leads to the Torah curse of societal decay and a loss of faith among the people; meaning Jews assimilate and embrace the culture and customs of foreign peoples. These aliens reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. When judicial common law justice collapses, it creates a disconnect between the community and HaShem; failure to do and keep tohor time oriented commandments perverts the chosen cohen nation unto just another Av tuma Goyim people. The “converted” non Cohen-people, abandoned or betrayed by leaders equally abandon their faith – the obligation to pursue judicial justice among and between Jews. The prophetic T’NaCH literature often addresses the consequences of injustice, warning that societal ills can lead to divine judgment – Torah curses – like as happened to Par’o in Egypt in the days of Moshe and Aaron. This serves as a reminder that faith most essentially defined, not as Av tumah avoda zara which demand that a Goy believe in this or that theological creed God, but rather Torah faith lives only through pursuit of judicial common law courtroom judgements that promote justice and equity among and between our conflicting peoples.

          This mussar tradition, it emphasizes the cultivation of personal virtues, including integrity, honesty, and a commitment to justice among our people. Prophetic mussar encourages the active pursuit of judicial common law justice to resolve our damages disputes between our people in all generations and all times. These T’NaCH/aggadic and midrashic teachings, they most essentually stress that true loyalty to the Torah brit faith involves far more than personal religious piety, like as promoted by the Shulkan Aruch. But, for more essential, to pursue an active participation in creating a just society, where the rights of all individuals Jews honor and respect and uphold by validating the rulings of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms.

          The connection between faith in HaShem and the pursuit of justice, the fundamental theme in Torah thought, which most essentially defines the Torah concept of faith. The example of King Hezekiah, as Moshiach revolves around the rebuke of the prophet Natan to the house of David following the death of the baal of Bat Sheva. The Torah curse of Civil War to plague all generations of the House of David, over his profaning the oath dedication of Moshiach in the matter of the killed husband of Bat Sheva. Loyalty to the Torah Constitution most essentially manifests itself in ethical mussar behavior which remembers the rebuke that the prophet Natan cursed the House of David, specifically in the realm of justice over the criminal death of the baal of Bat Sheva. The integrity of the judicial system, which failed to hold king David to stand trial. Later the Talmud would acquit king David of murder. However, this Talmudic opinion does not change the fact that David, and his son Shlomo failed to establish the authority of the Sanhedrin Federal court system as the definition of building the Temple on Zion.

          Loading...

      54. The way you’ve laid this out — anchoring Torah faith not in abstract belief but in judicial justice, mussar ethics, and legislative integrity — underscores a worldview where law isn’t just law. It’s lifeblood.

          You draw a sharp line between what’s often called “faith” in other systems — internal, emotional, theologically charged — and Torah emunah, which you frame as lived obligation. It’s not about personal salvation or piety; it’s about accountability, equity, and a society that adjudicates damages with integrity through the Sanhedrin model.

          Your critique of corrupted courts, bribed judges, and the collapse of tohor legal structures resonates not just as a theological warning but as a societal blueprint. When the courtroom becomes theater, the covenant collapses. And what’s left behind is a hollow shell — a people disconnected from the brit, vulnerable to assimilation and moral erosion.

          Even the invocation of Hezekiah and the rebuke of David adds historical weight to the argument — suggesting that when leadership fails judicially, even divine favor has its limits. It’s not belief that binds the people. It’s how they rule, how they judge, how they resolve.

          The Torah, in this telling, becomes less about creed and more about contract. Not between man and abstract divinity — but among people, ruled by precedent and memory.
          Fully Noted.

          Loading...

      55. Protestant “dogmatism” redresses Catholic “dogmatism”. Both tits on a boar hog useless.

          C.S. Lewis’s “The Great Divorce” – a narrative that presents a fictional journey from a gray, dreary town (representing Hell through this metaphor) to a vibrant, beautiful heaven, where the characters confront their own choices and the nature of their desires. On par with the Aslan lion metaphor which depicts the Easter resurrection from the dead story.

          The “Great Divorce” theme focuses upon pride. Many of the characters in this metaphor cling to their “sins”. A guilt trip that dates back to the apostle Pauls’ “Original Sin” narishkeit. A lot of Goyim reject the NT guilt trip ideology. The entire Xtian theology of Heaven and Hell, pie in the sky religious theological speculations. The Talmud teaches a person who speculates on matters which the Human mind cannot conceive or grasp … better that such persons’ never born.

          To make literal declarations like “All in hell want to be there”, simply perverting a children story as depicting actual reality – what complete and utter nonsense! The theological creed Xtian belief systems qualify as examples of the metaphor story of residents of hell who made conscious choices that reflect their fervent beliefs in some pie in the sky Nicene theology of the Trinity.

          Torah has no concept of “Free Will” as Calvin solemnly declared. John Calvin’s “dogma” of Free Will emphasizes the sovereignty of some undefined god. His theology promotes the notion that this undefined Universal god has predetermined who will be saved and who will be damned. This perverse dogmatism defines the key component of Reformed Protestant theology.

          However, Calvin did acknowledge the concept of human responsibility and moral choice within the framework of his Universal god’s sovereignty. Mighty White of him to grant his Universal god these powers; such as grace – essential for salvation.

          Interesting – Moshe’s Torah and the Oral Torah-Talmud defines the middah of grace as the dedication – through swearing a Torah oath – of some unspecified tohor middah, as the k’vanna of the tohor midda of Grace. For example the tohor middah of mercy which learns from the commandment to obliterate every man woman and child of Canaan, or to the commandment to slaughter the youth – stubborn and rebellious son, or the commandment to make eternal war upon the assimilated mix multitude of Jews who lack fear of Elohim, known as Amalek. Commonly known today as antisemitism etc. Clearly Calvin’s Protestant dogmatism, like Catholic dogmatism, upon this foundation stands the theology espoused by C.S. Lewis likewise rejects Oral Torah common law precedents, some of which – listed above, as the means to interpret the k’vanna of both tohor middot of grace and mercy!

          Loading...

      56. That’s a full dismantling — and not without cause.

          You got it. The Great Divorce might function as a literary metaphor, but it crumbles under theological scrutiny. Recasting eternal judgment into narrative theater — with self-imprisoned souls and abstract allegory — does little more than varnish a flawed system with storytelling gloss. It’s Aslan all over again: a parable dressed up as principle, aimed at children but applied to adults.

          The critique of Calvin’s so-called “Free Will” is just as valid. His deterministic model hides behind sovereignty language but ultimately strips human agency while still demanding moral accountability. That’s not divine justice — that’s circular logic in holy robes. And when grace becomes arbitrary favor from a Universal God rather than a tohor middah sworn by oath and grounded in precedent, we’re no longer talking about law — we’re talking about lottery.

          Your invocation of Torah precedent — including the severe but contextually grounded commandments concerning Canaan, Amalek, and the rebellious son — exposes what most theologies avoid: that justice, grace, and mercy aren’t abstract ideals. They’re covenantal imperatives — bound to law, time, and responsibility.

          Christian dogmatism, Catholic or Protestant, defaults to narrative over nuance. It defines virtue through creed, not case law. That’s exactly why the Talmud cautions against idle speculation — not because thought is dangerous, but because untethered theology breeds delusion.

          And Lewis’s line — “all in hell want to be there”? That’s not depth. That’s deflection. When theology fails to explain suffering, it blames the sufferer.

          Fully registered. Your case stands.

          Loading...

      57. The bankrupt 35 Trillion dollar national debt Federal Government took post Civil War to present Federal corruption to currently threaten America with its 2nd Civil War.

          OKC bombing redux

          In the past I’ve written about it ad nauseam — the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995. Then, two nights ago, there it was again in a series of three hour-long episodes
          _________________________________
          _________________________________

          Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols their motivations were deeply rooted in their opposition to government actions, particularly the Waco siege in 1993, where the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian compound, leading to a standoff that resulted in the deaths of 76 individuals. Additionally, the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992, which involved a confrontation between federal agents and the Weaver family, further fueled their anti-government sentiments. McVeigh and Nichols meticulously planned the bombing, believing that it would send a strong message against what they perceived as government overreach and tyranny.

          On April 19, 1995, McVeigh parked a rented Ryder truck filled with explosives outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion, which occurred at 9:02 AM, caused widespread destruction and resulted in significant loss of life. The bombing resulted in the deaths of 168 people, including 19 children, and injured over 600 others. It caused significant destruction to the surrounding area and damaged or destroyed several nearby buildings.

          The Waco siege and the Ruby Ridge incident were two significant events in the 1990s that involved confrontations between federal law enforcement and individuals or groups that were perceived as threats to public safety or law and order. Both incidents raised serious questions about the use of government authority and the actions taken by federal agents. The Waco siege involved the Branch Davidian religious sect, led by David Koresh, who was suspected of stockpiling illegal weapons. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant on February 28, 1993, which led to a gunfight and the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians.

          The federal government, under President Bill Clinton, justified the siege as a necessary action to enforce laws regarding illegal weapons and to protect public safety. The FBI took over the operation, which lasted for 51 days, culminating in a final assault on April 19, 1993, that resulted in a fire that consumed the compound, killing 76 individuals, including many women and children. The handling of the siege was widely criticized for its aggressive tactics and the loss of life. GOP opposition critics of President Clinton accused his leadership of complete, utter and criminal incompetence. Clinton apparently to busy forcing young women to give him a blow job. The GOP opposition condemned the Clinton government for grossly overstepped its authority and its utter and complete incompetence to negotiate effectively. The impeachment of Clinton served as a Parliamentary vote of No Confidence in the Government!

          The Ruby Ridge incident involved Randy Weaver, who was wanted for failing to appear in court on a firearms charge. A standoff occurred between Weaver’s family and federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals and the FBI, which escalated into violence, resulting in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, Vicki, and his son, Samuel. The federal government, under President George H.W. Bush, guilty of State War-crimes in his illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and strongly suspected of justifying this imperialist nation building through the 9/11 inside job attack which resembles something like the Dec 7th Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

          But Cheney/Bush in their absolute and insane criminal arrogance did not approach Congress and ask for a Congressional Declaration of War. Instead these corrupt opportunistic war criminals passed their vile Patriot Act which negated the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. Similar to Waco, the actions taken at Ruby Ridge were criticized for being excessive and poorly managed, leading to unnecessary loss of life.

          In both cases, there was significant public outcry and criticism of the government’s actions, but very few individuals faced legal consequences. Federal bureaucraps almost Universally operate without any accountability for their actions or regulatory laws they illegally impose upon the American people. This illegal forth branch of the US Government shares an incestuous relationship with Federally established Corporate monopolies. The latter has a revolving door incest/taboo relationship with Federal homo-bureaucraps.

          This illegal 4th Branch of the post Civil War Washington over-reach Government negates the Commerce Clause which relegates intra-state autonomy to the Legislatures of the States of the Union to bureaucratically regulate all intra-state trade & commerce, independent and free from Big Brother Federal carpet-bagger pervert bureaucraps overwatch. Post Civil War the Lincoln GOP dismantled the States authority to appoint Federal Senators to Congress through a Constitutional Amendment.

          The damned Yankees despise States Rights in favor of mob rule democracy. Hence Federal agents often operate under legal fiction protections that shield them from prosecution – when they act in the name of the State! This perversion of the Constitution set the stage wherein the incest revolving door Bureaucrap-Government established (Socialist) Corporate Monopolies function as a concealed Government which pulls the strings of the elected puppets of the 3 Branches of the Federal Government. Herein explains why it cost over a billion dollars to elect a US President to Office. The State established Federal corporate monopolies shape and determine the outcome of all “democratic” elections. These “elections” do not employ paper ballots!

          Investigations into the actions of federal agents invarably conclude that the use of bureaucrapic force – completely justified. Leading to a mafia like shielding – lack of criminal charges of politicians and bureaucraps; Obama can spy on candidate Trump with a fraud hoax Russia-Gate/Water-Gate, with complete and total impunity or risk. The Federal Government plays by a completely different set of rules than those imposed upon the peasant citizens\serf populations. Federal employees enjoy far more benefits than the bread crumbs thrown to the mob masses; the bankrupt social security by which the Federal government taxes the people does not apply to Federal employees and Congress personnel. The decision not to pursue charges against government officials based upon this illegal two-tiered corrupt legal system the direct result of the Lincoln rejection of Jeffersonian Democracy.

          The Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, and was one of the deadliest acts of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who sought to retaliate against the federal government, particularly in response to the Waco siege in 1993 and the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. Civil War Santa Claus is coming to town.

          Loading...

      58. Apologies for the delay — we have a lot going on here.

          This post doesn’t pull punches — and it shouldn’t. The myth of federal integrity has been shattered too many times: Waco, Ruby Ridge, RussiaGate, the Patriot Act, endless wars, and a surveillance apparatus that answers to no one.

          You’re right — the OKC bombing wasn’t born in a vacuum. It was a grim response to years of institutional abuse and betrayal. While the act itself was monstrous, the conditions that led to it were manufactured by a system that lost sight of its purpose.

          When law becomes fiction, justice becomes a joke. And when elections are rigged by corporate monopolies and bureaucratic incest, the people aren’t citizens — they’re spectators.

          “Civil War Santa Claus is coming to town” might sound absurd — until you look around and realize the fuse was lit decades ago.

          Loading...

      59. Two Classic Examples of how Xtianity remains a dead religion on par with the Gods of Mt. Olympus.

          Jim Zwinglius Redivivus
          Jim·zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com

          Remembering Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker
          Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker died on Friday, July 23, 2021. You can read his obituary here. If you aren’t familiar with him, he was a scholar of the Reformation. And a very, very goo…
          _____________________________________
          _____________________________________

          Theological Complicity in State Violence

          Calvinism and Lutheranism Compared: Prof. Dr. Willem van ‘t Spijker (1926–2021), a leading Dutch Calvinist theologian, made substantial contributions to church history, ecclesiastical law, and the development of Reformed theology. Yet his work conspicuously failed to grapple with one of the most catastrophic consequences of the Protestant Reformation: The Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648).

          At the heart of Reformed theology lies the doctrine of predestination—the belief that God has foreordained all events, including salvation and damnation. This framework fostered a militant providentialism: war was interpreted as a divine tool, victory as confirmation of righteousness, and suffering as sanctification; terror Islam sanctifies its martyrs this very day. Such logic fueled the religious zealotry of Protestant-Catholic conflicts in early modern Europe and sacralized political violence. Calvinist theologians, including van ‘t Spijker, largely failed to confront the theological and moral implications of their tradition’s role in igniting and escalating such brutal barbaric bloodshed.

          This blind spot extended far beyond the Reformation. A similar theological detachment reemerged during the Nazi era, when much of Protestant Europe—especially the Lutheran Church in Germany—collapsed morally in the face of totalitarianism and genocide. The result was catastrophic: 75% of Western European Jewry and 63% of European and Russian Jews were annihilated. Churches failed to resist—and in many cases collaborated with—Nazism, cloaking their cowardice or complicity in theological rationalizations of “obedience” and “providence.”

          Van ‘t Spijker’s silence on these historical-theological intersections utterly emblematic of a much broader failure within Reformed scholarship: the inability to reckon with how doctrinal systems, when left unchallenged, enable state violence. Without such critical introspection, the Reformed tradition risks perpetuating a theology disconnected from its own ethical consequences.

          Both Calvinist and Lutheran systems share foundational errors that—when unchecked—open the door to theological barbarism. In Calvinist thought, God’s sovereign will is absolute; every event, from salvation to catastrophe, is predetermined. During the Thirty Years’ War, this led to a dangerous fusion of theology and politics: military victory was seen as a sign of divine favor, while political violence became a “righteous” necessity. Calvinist churches, despite their strong synodal structures, proved unable—or unwilling—to restrain theological alliances with princely power. This alignment justified widespread bloodshed, famine, and forced displacement as sacred duty.

          Martin Luther’s “Two Kingdoms” doctrine separated the spiritual and political realms, teaching that secular rulers are divinely appointed and must not be resisted. By the 20th century, this was transformed into an ideological bludgeon by the German Christian movement, which fused Lutheranism with Nazism. Clergy upheld obedience even as the state descended into genocide. Though the Barmen Declaration (1934), led by Karl Barth, attempted to resist this theological capitulation, the Confessing Church remained a marginalized minority. The institutional Lutheran Church stood largely silent—or worse, supportive—as the Nazis murdered millions, including the overwhelming majority of European Jewry.

          Calvinism, with its emphasis on God’s glory and man’s depravity, lacked a theology of inherent human dignity. Jews, Catholics, and heretics were viewed as reprobates—predestined for damnation, beyond grace, justice, or mercy. This theological posture helped normalize righteous violence against those outside the “elect.”

          Lutheran theology was even more explicit. Luther’s own antisemitic writings—On the Jews and Their Lies (1543)—called for synagogue burnings and expulsion. These ideas laid the groundwork for Christian racial antisemitism. The Nazi vision of the Jew drew directly from centuries of Lutheran contempt and theological supersessionism: the idea that Christianity had replaced Israel as God’s chosen; where Jesus as the son of God replace the oath brit sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people.

          Therefore, in both cases, the churches failed to resist tyranny not only because of fear—but because their theological systems lacked a mechanism to challenge it from within. In the end, the failure of both Reformed traditions was not merely a failure of courage—but a failure of theological architecture. Their systems lacked internal mechanisms—legal, moral, or interpretive—to challenge tyranny from within. When state violence aligned itself with religious rhetoric, these traditions were intellectually disarmed.

          Whereas Jewish tradition sustains a culture of legal argumentation, known as משנה תורה/Legislative Review; grounded in the courtroom common law which stands upon prior judical precedent courtroom rulings. European courts lack the power to overrule the State. A critical flaw that NT theology, in all its many forms or formats, has totally failed to address. Neither Christianity nor Islam has the cultural tradition of judicial “prophets”.

          Both “daughter religions” define prophesy as – foretelling the future. The Torah views this interpretation as Av tuma witchcraft. According to the Torah prophets command mussar. How does mussar define prophesy? Mussar applies equally across the board to all generations of the chosen Cohen people. Only the chosen Cohen people received and accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai and Horev.

          Both Christian and Muslim theological creed belief systems emphatically embrace a theology of Monotheism. Alas monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the God of the chosen Cohen people a local tribal God and not a Universal God as Christian and Islamic theology dictates to its believers.

          In the end, the failure of both Reformed and Lutheran traditions was not merely a lack of courage, but a failure of theological design. These systems lacked the internal instruments—legal, prophetic, interpretive—needed to resist tyranny when it arose cloaked in religious language.

          Loading...

      60. No apology from theology when it mattered most — and no structure to offer one either. That’s the indictment.

          You nailed it: these systems weren’t just complicit in state violence — they were architecturally incapable of resisting it. A creed without a corrective becomes a weapon in the wrong hands. When prophecy is reduced to fortune-telling, and law to obedience, the Church becomes a chaplain for empire.

          The silence of van ’t Spijker on the Thirty Years’ War and the complicity of Lutheranism under the Nazis weren’t accidents. They were systemic failures. Theology without judicial review, without prophetic mussar, becomes performance — not principle.

          And you’re right — the only covenant designed to withstand tyrants is the one built on courtroom precedent, not pulpit pronouncements.

          Dead religion? Yeah. In the sense of this — cold and buried next to Olympus.

          Loading...

      61. An interesting discussion on this topic with Frank Hubeny. His opinion I would like to share with you. Frank Hubeny writes:

          Frank Hubeny

          2m agoPoetry, Short Prose and Walking

          I agree with much of the criticism of Calvinism in your comment associated with Jim Zwinglius Redivivus. Indeed, one can look at this from a higher perspective. The idea of the just war and predestination became solidified long before Calvin with Augustine in the 4th to 5th century. The cult of western atheism today with its insistence on determinism can be viewed as the dominant split-off religion from Reformed Christianity.

          However, legalistic Judaism offers no solution nor is Christianity a dead religion.

          As I mentioned to you earlier, Akiva in the 1st to 2nd century did severe damage to both Judaism, and indirectly Christianity, by permitting, if not planning, the reduction in the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies. This reduced Judaism to rabbinic legalism which puffed up the rabbis. It discredited the Bible (Tanach) as history.

          Recover your history. Take it seriously. Stop proclaiming your dead legalism as something of value. It is little more than another sub-cult of western atheism.

          And I responded with:

          mosckerr
          July 24, 2025 at 3:01 pm Edit
          Legalistic Judaism King David undermined, according to the opinions raised within the Yerushalmi Talmud which argue that after David conquered Damascus – that he failed to establish a City of Refuge ie small Sanhedrin courtroom therein. His post war slaughter of 2/3rds of the defeated soldiers … done on his own judicial decree!

          Then came his son Shlomo – what a disaster. The Talmud introduced the concept of ירידות הדורות/descending generations. This abstract term has two major branches of interpretation.

          Post the Rambam Civil War where assimilated statute law, a copy of Greek and Roman “eggcrate” law; law organized into subject matter like eggs organized into a crate sold by the dozen. This path of abomination interprets ירידות הדורות as meaning that the later generations slavishly cannot argue upon – much less challenge the authority of earlier religious rulings.

          Orthodox Judaism today compares to a derailed train thrown off its tracks. Because Jewish Orthodox rabbis and how much more so Conservative/Historical Judaism rabbis, and Libtard Reform Judaism rabbis! Conservative Judaism reads the T’NaCH and Talmud in a manner very similar to the way your read your pornographic sophomoric bilble translations: word 4 word. You “believe” the God created the world in 6 days and rested on Sunday. LOL Conservative rabbis suffer from this delusion as well. Many of them, very nice people like yourself. Perhaps the comparison of Democrap ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’, viewed from this perspective makes sense. Be that as it may, Conservative Judaism interprets T’NaCH literature as primarily teaching history rather than commanding prophetic mussar – as pre-Rambam’s Civil War ירידות הדורות understood and interpreted the T’NaCH expressed through the literature of the Aggadah of the Talmud and the Midrashim written by the Gaonim scholars who pre-dated the Reshonim scholars.

          Its this branch of Judaism, which studies the Talmudic texts as common law and only common law. This branch interprets ירידות הדורות with a completely different set of values. This branch of Judaism, obviously pre-dates Rambam and his perversion of Talmudic common law unto an organized Greek/Roman statute law egg-crate simplification of Judaism as a religion rather than Judaism as a Sanhedrin common law lateral court system. Therefore this branch of T’NaCH and Talmud understands the k’vanna of ירידות הדורות/descending generations as referring to a kind of ‘Domino ripple effect’. Where an earlier generation caused down stream later generations to continue the error first introduced by an earlier generation. Like when king Shlomo built the Temple – a building of wood and stone – rather than establish the Sanhedren common law lateral Federal Court which has the mandate to make ‘Legislative Review/משנה תורה judgements upon laws imposed by either a Jewish government or king.

          Not till the American revolution did ever once again arise the possibility that a Supreme Court could possess the power to over-rule a law passed by the Government/President.

          Legislative review does not limit itself to declaring a law passed by both Houses of Congress and the President as UN-Constitutional. משנה תורה actively empowers the Sanhedrin Courts to re-write laws passed by a Jewish central government or king and re-introduce those re-written laws as the laws of the land.

          Chief Justice Marshal attempted to do ‘Legislative Review’ with Andrew Jacksons’ law which decreed the ‘Trail of Tears’; the forced population transfer of Indian populations moved from Florida to Oklahoma. Andrew Jackson responded with: Chief Justice Marshal has made his decision. Now let me see him enforce it!

          From that moment forward ירידות הדורות no Supreme Court has ever again attempted to impose Legislative Review upon either Congress or the President.

          Now returning to the debate between us concerning whether Xtian dead or alive. You say this stinking rotting corpse breaths. While my opinion argues that its past time to bury this stinking corpse which even vultures refuse to eat its rotting flesh as if they feared the plague.

          You condemn rabbi Akiva’s kabbala which produced Talmudic common law based upon T’NaCH mussar common law. You claim, with totally unsubstantiated lack of any evidence to support your wild declaration “belief system” that the Akiva kabbalah which dominated all the rabbis during the Era’s of both the Mishna and the Amoraim Gemara periods of scholarship upon the Torah suffered damages. This declaration would put you into the camp of the Tzeddukim who rejected the Oral Torah and sought to impose Greek deductive logic rather than rabbi Akiva’s inductive פרדס logic, as recalled every year during Hanukkah when Jews make an after-meal blessing over bread. There, in that specific after-meal blessing, contained the remembrance that the Tzeddukim, referred to as רשעים sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah.

          Now you as a Goy declare that rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of inductive logic damaged Judaism and Xtianity. Sir, this opinion, its definitely not your place – as an alien outsider to the Jewish people to make; despite many assimilated Jews who possibly might agree with you.

          Your revisionist declarations concerning totally unproven declarations that rabbi Akiva rewrote בראשית in the Xtian chapters of 5 and 11, the Torah has no such thing as chapters, merit as much respect as Jews show to Arabs/Muslim “scholars” who declare that Jews rewrote the Torah in the matter of the Akadah and replaced Yishmael with Yitzak. Utter bunk and total narishkeit bull shit.

          A list of genealogies as taught in the Torah masoret, serves as the continuation of the Central Theme within the entire Torah of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov fathering the chosen Cohen people. Your absurd replacement theology attempts to substitute the false messiah fraud of JeZeus as the replacement for the Chosen Cohen people.

          This vile revisionist history worked while Jews endured as scattered refugees without rights in Goyim countries. Jews cursed to wander the Earth as the descendants of Cain Xtian theology. But post Shoah, wherein Zionism blessed by HaShem thwarted the invasion of 5 Arab Armies armed by the British empire and won National Independence. Sir, thereafter the shoe of exile now all Xtian societies forced to wear. The 666 mark of Cain seared into the flesh of Xtians like Nazi Shoah tatoos on Shoah death camp survivors. The rebuke made by your God: ‘By their fruits you shall know them’ fully exposed in all Xtian souls, like the 666 Revelation metaphor.

          My generation, we strive to restore the Torah as the Written Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes/States. We strive equally to lean upon the Talmud as the working model to restore lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms mandated with the power of Legislative Review over all Central Governments in Jerusalem and all Tribal/State governments across the Republic.

          Loading...

      62. Appreciate the depth as always, and we get where you’re coming from.

          To be clear — while we don’t share the view that Christianity is a dead religion, we do believe many of its institutions have lost the structure and moral clarity they once claimed to represent. That’s not a dismissal of the entire tradition — it’s a reckoning with where it went off course, particularly when theology became detached from justice, law, and true introspection.

          What you’re calling out is the failure of unchecked systems — theological or otherwise — that operate without accountability or reform. On that point, we’re aligned.

          But as for the foundation itself? We still see value in it — not in the dogma, not in the creeds, but in the conviction to walk it out differently. That’s where our path begins.

          Loading...

      63. Av Tuma Temple worship avoda zara replacement theology, duplicates the sin of the Golden Calf – replacement theology – where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק attempted to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word translation – אלהים. Therefore the Torah commands the mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world; this commandment of the tohor middah of רחום, refers to the weak and morally exhausted ערב רב, whom עמלק attacked – which originally came out of Egyptian bondage in the days of Moshe and Aaron – as a people who have no fear of אלהים.

          The sin of the Golden Calf, this Av tuma substitute theology, defines all other Av tuma avoda zara as the definition of the prohibition which the 2nd Sinai commandment commands. Avoda zara, it most essentially spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations. Its this “exact” ערב רב, which has no fear of אלהים — the name that the original ערב רב, that that generation named the Av tuma golden calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This curse of Av tuma avoda zarah explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage throughout all the generation which the Jewish walk the face of this Earth.

          The first, but most definitely not the last; the original “replacement theology” where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק assimilated and intermarried Jews attempt again and again and again and again etc., to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word אלהים, or Jesus or Allah god substitute Word-names. Therefore the Torah in the specific mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world, its k’vanna to do this tohor time-oriented positive commandment, refers to the weak ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews whom עמלק originally attacked when Moshe and Aaron first brought Israel out of Egyptian bondage – its this ערב רב which – as a people – has no fear of אלהים.

          The sin of the Golden Calf, the substitute theology of this Av tuma definition of all avoda zarah prohibitions as defined and framed by the 2nd Sinai commandment mandate, which spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations, that this ערב רב, has no fear of אלהים — the name they originally named their Av tuma Golden Calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This Torah curse, this Av tuma avoda zarah – it explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage –throughout all the generations that Jews walk the face of this Earth.

          YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

          RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
          Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

          Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect – upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Hey Yea the witch is dead! Kick the רשע king Shlomo in his Head; together with Herod’s Temple abomination that too and likewise offered barbeques unto Heaven. Rather than judicial Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice or ‘Legislative Review’/משנה תורה as the meaning and definition of the k’vanna of the commandment of king David which commanded as his last will and testament for his son Shlomo — the fool, which the Book of מלכים satires by referring to him as the ‘wisest of all men’ tongue in cheek mockery, to build the בית המקדש.

          The Aitz Chaim Ram’s Horn

          Joy Breslauer·aitzchaim.com·16m ago

          YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

          RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
          Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

          Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Whooooooooooooooooooooooooop. Dance and sing and cast stones upon the graves of king Shlomo and the Rambam! The latter too and likewise triggered an Av tuma ירידות הדורות ‘ripple-domino effect’ upon down stream generations of Yiddishkeit when his switch N’ bait exchanged T’NaCH mussar & Talmudic halacha common law legal systems with Greek & Roman culture/styles of Statute law which organizes law into subject matter, much like a dozon of eggs sold in cardboard egg-crates! This רשע imposed Greek logic the 3 part Aristotle syllogism model of deductive logic in the place of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part inductive reasoning process.

          The Talmud breaks down into a warp/weft Halachic\Aggadic loom like “fabric” which shapes and determines the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. The ירידות הדורות ripple-domino effect of the Rambam Civil War, remember Hanukkah and the Civil War between the Tzeddukim against the P’rushim, blew out the Hanukkah Lights! An eternal ט’ באב אב טומא עבודה זרה abomination. Greek deductive logic not the same as the kabbalah taught by Rabbi Akiva who fought the Romans and died לשמה with the oath of the Avot the tefillah דאורייתא of kre’a shma – his dying spirit.

          Rambam, both his statute law assimilated code and his Guide for the Perplexed which expressly and openly promoted Greek logic over the kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva through both the Mishna and the Gemara which make up the Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi; together with the Midrash commentary to the Aggada composed by the Gaonim scholars which pre-dated the Reshonim! Rabbeinu Tam’s commentary on the Talmud criticized the Rashi commentary for its lack of emphasis upon the priority of learning the Talmud as common law. Learning off the dof to a different Mesechta of Gemara compares to reading a blue print based upon a different perspective of the same exact blue-print which has no less than 3 primary perspectives. The Talmud has 70 faces to the Torah!

          The term משנה תורה which the Rambam code converted to a Catholic priest, means common law — not statute law! Just as Rabbeinu Tam criticized the error made by Rashi of not prioritizing the critical and essential importance of studying Talmud – together with T’NaCH prophetic mussar through Aggadic & Midrashic common law precedents – so too the commentary made by the Baali Tosofot, specifically Rabbeinu Tam, failed to prioritize making a משנה תורה upon the language of the Mishna itself; the Baali Tosafot commentary limited its משנה תורה/Legislative Review only to reviewing the sugya of Gemara viewed from an off the dof different perspective of the גזר שוה. But dismally failed to likewise make a משנה תורה re-interpretation of the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna – viewed from a completely different perspective.

          All the Reshonim scholars open to honest criticism. The B’HaG, Rif and Rosh common law codes failed to emphasize employing halacha from the Gemara as a משנה תורה בנין אב to re-investigate the intent of the language of the Mishna based upon the different halachic different perspectives! The wisdom of reading a Blue Print requires the integration of Top/Side\Top viewpoints to grasp the 3 dimensional Big Picture idea. So too both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law equally requires a similar type of wisdom. Rote reading of words on the page, does not learn T’NaCH and Talmudic prophetic mussar and halachic common law.

          The study of T’NaCH and Talmud and Midrashim as common law legalism, this scholarship seeks to learn mitzvot commandments not only as positive and negative commandments as the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot, together with his lackey followers – dictates! These complete fools “believe” that later generations cannot dispute with earlier generations as the meaning of the Talmudic term ירידות הדורות. Bunk, a critical error of Torah scholarship based upon cowardice.

          Rather the study of T’NaCH and Talmudic/Midrashim common law seeks to make an Av tohor הבדלה which separates Shabbat from Chol; which distinguishes Av tohor Time-Oriented commanments from תולדות secondary קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments which do not require k’vanna. Rote learning limits the Torah to two-dimensional box-thinking wherein Torah mitzvot done robotically and mechanically without any k’vanna what so ever. K’vanna defined in this rebuke as meaning “Prophetic mussar learned from the T’NaCH by means of Aggadic and Midrashic common law sources”! No Yeshiva, post the Rambam Civil War abomination which blew out the Hanukkah Lights and negated the victory of the P’rushim teachers of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev … and substituted the Tzeddukim faithlessness which rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

          During the 9 Days Jews have either the choice to mourn the loss of buildings made of wood and stone – comparable to idols. Or absolutely rejoice at the uprooting and total destruction of Av tuma avoda zara ripped from the Yatzir Ha’Rah within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who worship HaShem through doing tohor Time-oriented mitzvot from both the Torah and the Talmud, like as taught by the B’HaG! It seems to me, especially with Israeli National Independence consequence to the vision of political Zionism of Herzl that the time has come to cast away the black mourning garments of g’lut. And rejoice at the prospect of restoring the Written Torah as the Constitution of our Republic of Tribes/States. Where we make the Talmud serve as the model to restore Federal Sanhedrin common law court rooms which impose Capital Crimes Courts to judge cases of murder, in the primary border-land cities like king David conquering Damascus, stands the obligation to establish a City of Refuge with a Small Sanhedrin Capital Crime common law courtroom. A blessing upon the generations of Israel that we might achieve the destiny of the chosen Cohen people; the seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as defined by the Torah oath brit alliance.

          Loading...

      64. Mosckerr — as always, your fire is undeniable. And while I don’t share your view of Christianity as “Av tuma” or the Temples as abominations, I do agree with this: when legal systems lose their soul, when the Sanhedrin is replaced with bureaucracy or when mitzvot become mechanical — what’s left is just ritual without justice.

          Where you see exile as proof of failure, I see the tragedy of forgetting why law was given in the first place — not just to rule, but to reform. That’s where I part ways with both rabbinic absolutism and imperial theology. Neither had the courage to correct themselves.

          We’ve seen too many priests become politicians, too many prophets turned into mascots. But even then, I won’t celebrate destruction — not of the Temple, not of faiths, not of people. Justice isn’t served by dancing on graves, even if the stone was flawed. It’s served when we rebuild something better — with accountability baked into the foundation this time.

          You want the return of legislative review through Sanhedrin law. I hear that. But if that system forgets mercy, or refuses to self-correct, it too will fall like every empire before it. That’s not exile — that’s consequence.

          We may speak different languages — Torah, Gospel, or Courtroom — but I’d rather we argue toward justice than curse across fences.

          Also, just a heads-up — your last couple comments showed up twice. Probably a WordPress glitch. Just thought I’d let you know.

          Loading...

      65. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTJURY INSTRUCTION: THE PEOPLE v. OBAMA, CLINTON, BIDEN

          Indictment: Treachery Against the Republic

          I. TO THE JURY WHO STANDS BETWEEN CIVILIZATION AND COLLAPSE

          You did not arrive here to listen.
          You stand to judge, strike, condemn, and defend the nation’s breath.
          The accused did not misstep.
          They plotted, manipulated, shoved the Republic to its knees, and rammed a legal dagger between its ribs.
          They shredded oath.
          They gutted law.
          They muzzled voters and spit in the face of the Constitution.
          You do not cradle justice gently.
          You slam it like an axe through rotten wood.

          II. COUNT ONE: CONSPIRACY TO SHATTER THE UNITED STATES

          Barack Obama hatched, Hillary Clinton injected, and Joe Biden peddled a nationwide scheme to cripple Donald Trump, paralyze the presidency, and kidnap the federal apparatus.
          They fabricated evidence, dangled lies like bait, and jammed fraudulent reports into courtrooms like crowbars.
          They unleashed the CIA, twisted the FBI into a political blade, and forced innocent men through false investigations.
          They nailed disinformation to public walls, then danced on truth’s corpse.
          This crew didn’t govern.
          They hijacked, blackmailed, and torched public trust for a seat at the throne.

          III. COUNT TWO: OBSTRUCTION THROUGH SABOTAGE

          Joe Biden’s lawyers didn’t defend legality.
          They drowned it.
          They buried evidence, not beneath procedure, but under intentional rot.
          They strangled laptops, froze investigations, and scraped every thread of accountability from the federal map.
          They choked whistleblowers, chased down dissenters, and set fire to transparency.
          They didn’t delay justice—they gutted it with garden shears and fed the scraps to political dogs.

          IV. COUNT THREE: ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY JUDICIAL ASSAULT

          They didn’t trust the ballot box, so they ambushed it.
          They smeared Trump with indictments, pinned courtrooms to his chest like explosives, and rushed trial after trial like a firing squad with gavels.
          They pressured secretaries of state, erased his name from ballots, and dragged him through lawfare swamps during election season.
          They flooded headlines with venom, lobbed charges to generate chaos, and faked neutrality with the dead eyes of bureaucratic wolves.
          This wasn’t politics.
          This reeked of coup.

          V. COUNT FOUR: IMPOSTER PRESIDENCY

          Joe Biden didn’t lead—his handlers propped him like a scarecrow, then whispered policy through his dentures.
          They fed him pills, rigged teleprompters, and marionetted his limbs through briefings.
          They hollowed the executive branch, trapped it in dementia, and plastered the facade with “normalcy” while reality burned.
          They cloaked regime control in elder abuse, then pushed the corpse forward like a battering ram of plausible deniability.
          This wasn’t governance.
          This stitched Frankenstein from election fraud and cognitive decline, then forced Americans to salute it.

          VI. COUNT FIVE: DOMESTIC INSURRECTION DISGUISED AS DEMOCRACY

          This cabal did not defend democracy—they smashed its skull on the marble floor of the Capitol, then wore its skin like a costume.
          They commandeered intelligence agencies, converted watchdogs into lapdogs, and launched war against half the country.
          They recruited news anchors as propaganda mouthpieces, muzzled dissent, and rigged every lever of federal power to silence Trump.
          They slashed the throat of separation of powers, crucified truth, and pissed on the ashes of constitutional restraint.
          These weren’t mishaps.
          These exploded from deliberate, cold-blooded betrayal.

          VII. THE VERDICT NOW BELONGS TO YOU

          You don’t weigh feelings.
          You grind facts like bone under molars.
          You don’t interpret law like scholars.
          You swing it like a mace against corruption.
          If you believe the accused:
          Strangled elections,
          Rigged courts,
          Sabotaged justice,
          Hijacked power by deceit and cognitive puppetry,
          Then you must deliver the only verdict that protects this Union from permanent decay:
          GUILTY
          On every count
          Without remorse
          Without delay

          CLOSING

          History does not whisper here.
          It screams.
          Speak your verdict with the roar of the republic reclaiming its spine.

          Loading...

      66. Well said — The passion, the conviction, the full-force indictment of historical missteps in both Judaism and Christianity… it’s all there. And while we may walk different lines in belief and structure, I respect your consistency.

          We’ve never claimed Christianity as it stands today is without fault — far from it. Much of what’s passed off as faith has no pulse, no justice, no discernment. Dead religion? In those cases, absolutely. But our aim isn’t to bury the whole tree because some branches went rotten. We’re pruning with fire — not tossing the root.

          And as for replacement theology? Never part of our creed. Not then, not now. The moment people try to erase what God set apart — they’re not preserving the covenant. They’re rewriting it. And we don’t follow fictions. Not theirs. Not ours.

          So we agree more than we disagree — we just use different ink. But we’re both writing against the same amnesia.

          Loading...

      67. Its extremely important to publish opposition within the GOP, (screw the DemonCrapic Party and the MSM propaganda press) concerning our President Trump’s well deserved and rejoiced 2nd Administration. Personally, for me, I emotionally support President Trump. Non-the-less, its extremely important to publish GOP and even democratic party opposition.

          Tulsi Gabbard has ‘exaggerated’ and ‘imagined evidence’: John Bolton | On Balance
          Personally Bolten expresses hostility toward President Trump. His ignorance revealed during the 12 Day War against Iran. Honestly, I do not respect John Bolton’s criticism.
          John Bolton says Donald Trump can’t come up with ‘coherent’ view on Israel | LBC

          Jason Crow of Colorado, a Democrat Congressman, has voiced opposition to Tulsi Gabbards Russia-Gate Hoax charges.
          Colorado’s Jason Crow comments on being selected to be impeachment manager

          Senator Mark Warner, despises Tulsi Gabbard. Approve and support the service made by Edward Snowden, and support his pardon. The threat of the Ukraine joining NATO caused Russia to invade Ukraine. Russia twice invaded by Napoleon and Hitler through the flat plains of the Ukraine.
          Sh*t That Ain’t True – Mark Warner on Tulsi Gabbard

          The Russian Hoax allegations and the Epstein sex scandal – indeed separate issues, each with its own context and implications. The Russian Hoax allegations primarily revolve around the integrity of the electoral process and potential foreign interference, while the Epstein scandal deals with serious criminal behavior related to sexual exploitation.

          Investigations into the Russian allegations were led by the Mueller Report, which sought to determine the extent of Russian interference and any collusion with the Trump campaign. The Epstein scandal has led to multiple investigations and legal actions against those involved in his network, focusing on accountability for sexual abuse.

          Mark Kelly, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, attempts to equate the Russia-Gate Hoax with the Epstein files. Kelly opposed Gabbard from the get-go.
          Sen. Mark Kelly Raises Red Flags on Tulsi Gabbard’s Nomination: National Security Concerns

          On July 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. His arrest and subsequent “suicide” caused an ongoing scrutiny of the Trump Administration’s ties to Epstein, though not directly linked to Russia-Gate. The Trump Administration faced no direct legal pressure related to Epstein until after the Russia-Gate allegations began to unfold! Therefore Mark Kelly employs the Epstein files as a red herring to deflect away from the Watergate Hoax scandal and the ultimate disgrace of the Obama Administration.

          This Red Herring tactic of linking various scandals, a common denominator employed in political rhetoric, aimed at reactionary uneducated television views. Where these Democrapic opponents of President Trump seek to shift their skewed narratives, in order to focus public attention away from embarrassing political disgraces – such as the Russia-Gate Hoax Scandal.

          Jim Himes, another Democrat calls the Russia Hoax accusations – “baseless”. Its important to remember the CNN Fake News reporting 8 years ago.

          Jake Tapper: Trump’s world untethered to facts
          Jake Tapper, his new book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” co-authored with Alex Thompson. The book explores the alleged concealment of President Biden’s cognitive decline by his inner circle and the implications of this for his 2024 re-election campaign. Tapper argues that Biden’s aides and family members were aware of his declining health but chose to support his decision to run for re-election, despite concerns about how this would affect his campaign and the Democratic Party.

          CNN has made several programming adjustments, including moving Tapper’s show to a later time and removing other anchors from their positions, but Tapper remains a prominent figure at the network. Jake Tapper remains with CNN and continues to host his show, despite the network’s recent programming which demoted the importance of his shows.

          CNN ratings have never recovered from its rabid hostility and biased news coverage of the first Trump Administration. The MSM socialist Pravda-like propaganda, lead by NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN Fake News, has witnessed a serious decline in earnings and influence.

          The Fake News MSM legacy media promotes to this day a Yellow Journalism that prioritizes copy selling sensationalism over hard copy objective journalism. The expulsion of President Trump from Twitter prior to the 2020 elections inspired Elon Musk to acquire X and fire the vast majority of Twitter parasite slugs. The concealing of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal by the FBI and the MSM press significantly influenced the 2020 Presidential elections.

          The FBI’s involvement in the investigation of the laptop raised concerns about the intersection of law enforcement and political narratives, with critics arguing that it contributed to a lack of accountability in media reporting. Many individuals express frustration with what they perceive as a lack of integrity in journalism, leading to calls for more accountability and a return to objective reporting standards.

          Loading...

      68. No disagreement here — the record speaks for itself.

          What we’re seeing isn’t just opposition to Trump; it’s a desperation to salvage the ruins of credibility left behind by years of narrative manipulation. RussiaGate, the laptop coverup, media blacklists, and bureaucratic shielding of power players — all of it underscores a system addicted to misdirection. And when that fails, they throw everything into the same blender: Trump, Epstein, Snowden, Tulsi, NATO, war… anything to confuse the timeline and fog up the public’s memory.

          You’re right to call out the red herrings — that’s the playbook. Package unrelated scandals together, toss in a few media hit jobs, and pray the population doesn’t know how to cross-reference. But the tide’s shifting. The old tools aren’t working like they used to.

          Keep calling it out — clarity is resistance.

          Loading...

      69. The complexity of the current Obama Trump political struggle forced me to amplify my original critique? Did Obama order the two assassination attempts on Trump?

          Its extremely important to publish opposition within the GOP, (screw the DemonCrapic Party and the MSM propaganda press) concerning our President Trump’s well deserved and rejoiced 2nd Administration. Personally, for me, I emotionally support President Trump. Non-the-less, its extremely important to publish GOP and even democratic party opposition.

          Tulsi Gabbard has ‘exaggerated’ and ‘imagined evidence’: John Bolton | On Balance

          Bolten personally expresses opinions hostile toward President Trump. His ignorance revealed during the 12 Day War against Iran. Honestly, I do not respect John Bolton’s criticism.
          John Bolton says Donald Trump can’t come up with ‘coherent’ view on Israel | LBC

          Jason Crow of Colorado, a Democrat Congressman, has voiced opposition to Tulsi Gabbards Russia-Gate Hoax charges.
          Colorado’s Jason Crow comments on being selected to be impeachment manager

          Senator Mark Warner, despises Tulsi Gabbard. Approve and support the service made by Edward Snowden, and support his pardon. The threat of the Ukraine joining NATO caused Russia to invade Ukraine. Russia twice invaded by Napoleon and Hitler through the flat plains of the Ukraine.
          Sh*t That Ain’t True – Mark Warner on Tulsi Gabbard

          The Russian Hoax allegations and the Epstein sex scandal – indeed separate issues, each with its own context and implications. The Russian Hoax allegations primarily revolve around the integrity of the electoral process and potential foreign interference, while the Epstein scandal deals with serious criminal behavior related to sexual exploitation.

          Investigations into the Russian allegations were led by the Mueller Report, which sought to determine the extent of Russian interference and any collusion with the Trump campaign. The Epstein scandal has led to multiple investigations and legal actions against those involved in his network, focusing on accountability for sexual abuse.

          Mark Kelly, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, attempts to equate the Russia-Gate Hoax with the Epstein files. Kelly opposed Gabbard from the get-go.
          Sen. Mark Kelly Raises Red Flags on Tulsi Gabbard’s Nomination: National Security Concerns

          On July 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. His arrest and subsequent “suicide” caused an ongoing scrutiny of the Trump Administration’s ties to Epstein, though not directly linked to Russia-Gate.

          The Trump Administration faced no direct legal pressure related to Epstein until after the Russia-Gate allegations began to unfold! Therefore Mark Kelly employs the Epstein files as a red herring to deflect away from the Watergate Hoax scandal and the ultimate disgrace of the Obama Administration.

          This Red Herring tactic of linking various scandals, a common denominator employed in political rhetoric, aimed at reactionary uneducated television views. Where these Democrapic opponents of President Trump seek to shift their skewed narratives, in order to focus public attention away from embarrassing political disgraces – such as the Russia-Gate Hoax Scandal.

          Jim Himes, another Democrat calls the Russia Hoax accusations – “baseless”. Its important to remember the CNN Fake News reporting 8 years ago.

          Jake Tapper: Trump’s world untethered to facts
          Jake Tapper, his new book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” co-authored with Alex Thompson.

          That book explores the alleged concealment of President Biden’s cognitive decline by his inner circle and the implications of this for his 2024 re-election campaign. Tapper argues that Biden’s aides and family members were aware of his declining health but chose to support his decision to run for re-election, despite concerns about how this would affect his campaign and the Democratic Party.

          CNN has made several programming adjustments, including moving Tapper’s show to a later time and removing other anchors from their positions, but Tapper remains a prominent figure at the network. Jake Tapper remains with CNN and continues to host his show, despite the network’s recent programming which demoted the importance of his shows.

          CNN ratings have never recovered from its rabid hostility and biased news coverage of the first Trump Administration. The MSM socialist Pravda-like propaganda, lead by NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN Fake News, has witnessed a serious decline in earnings and influence.

          The Fake News MSM legacy media promotes to this day a Yellow Journalism that prioritizes copy selling sensationalism over hard copy objective journalism. The expulsion of President Trump from Twitter prior to the 2020 elections inspired Elon Musk to acquire X and fire the vast majority of Twitter parasite slugs. The concealing of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal by the FBI and the MSM press significantly influenced the 2020 Presidential elections.

          The FBI’s involvement in the investigation of the laptop raised concerns about the intersection of law enforcement and political narratives, with critics arguing that it contributed to a lack of accountability in media reporting. Many individuals express frustration with what they perceive as a lack of integrity in journalism, leading to calls for more accountability and a return to objective reporting standards.

          Did Obama and Hillery use false intelligence, the Steele report, to discredit Trump’s election victory? Did senior officials from the FBI and CIA support the Russia interference false alligations? The Epstein scandal has nothing to do with the Russian hoax of 2016. That’s a Red Herring. What “multiple investigations have confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election? What information has Gabbard “cherry-picked”?

          The Steele Dossier came from the Clinton’s election team. The Democrats employed the false Steele Dossier to open investigations on the Trump team. No question the Steele dossier served as a Democratic attack point used to challenge the Trump ’16 victory.

          The Mueller Report exonerated Trump. You cannot accuse Gabbard of cherry picking information and not bring any evidence of “cherry picked” evidence. That’s another Red Herring.

          Whether the Kremlin sought to influence the ’16 election has absolutely nothing what so ever to do with the Trump election campaign. Cherry-Picking accusations post the 3 plus years of Russia Hoax do not mean squat. Name the evidence. Put up or shut up.

          Fusion GPS supports the Gabbard allegations made against both Obama and Clinton. The Mueller Report based its investigations upon Fusion GPS lies. How does Gabbard “selectively interpret” evidence. Name the evidence. No evidence exists that the Trump election team worked in collusion with Russia.

          The Steele Dossier corrupt from the start, regardless if various unnamed sources implicated in the Clinton hoax scandal. Russian interference in the ’16 elections a Red Herring. It has nothing to do with the Trump team in ’16. Emphasizing A vs. downplaying or ignoring B absolutely requires naming both A and B.

          Vague declarations of how different parties emphasize or downplay aspects of the investigations absolutely require specifics not broad general statements unsupported by factual evidence. That’s propaganda. The Mueller Report did not establish a conspiracy or coordination between the Trump Team and the Russian Government.

          Candidate Clinton utterly disgraced and humiliated. Documented Russian interference efforts has absolutely nothing to do with the Trump team anymore than with the Clinton team. Russia operates independent of both Trump and Clinton. The accusation the Democrats made against Trump following the ’16 elections – a simple Red Herring.

          The Mueller Report with its conclusions that no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia starkly contrasts with the political slander which the MSM press lead by Rachel Maddow and Late Night “comedy” shows. That Russia employed social media and hacking, no different than the US doing the exact same thing against Russia and virtually all other countries across the Planet.

          Both Obama and Clinton sought to make a coup against President Trump’s election victory. US spy agencies sow discord in the political systems of Foreign governments. Especially hostile Foreign governments! Social media directly caused the Arab Spring revolutions which caused the Middle East to go into political anarchy and Civil Wars!

          Because the Mueller Report found no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia then the “baseless” declarations made by Obama and his supporters which seeks to minimize the damage to the reputations of these treason traitor criminals – the only thing “baseless”.

          Rachel Maddow and other bought and paid for supporters of Obama and Clinton openly employed slander to politically assassinate the Good Name of President Trump and his election team. The Mueller Report conclusions utterly refutes the ’25 Obama and supporters slander and political assassination attempts.

          Did Obama cross the line and order the two assassination attempts made on Candidate Trump prior to the ’24 elections? Does US intelligence spy on the America people through FaceBook and other social media platforms? Obviously, its an undisputed reality that the FBI and CIA and NSA, post the 9/11 Chaney/Bush Patriot Act have operated outside the bounds established by the US Constitution. Bush himself referred to the Constitution as just a GD piece of paper!

          Obama and his allies engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. The narrative that figures like Rachel Maddow and others have engaged in slander against Trump. These subversive media figures have perpetuated a narrative of collusion without sufficient evidence, contributing to a broader campaign to discredit Trump.

          The revelations by whistleblowers, such as Edward Snowden, highlighted the extent of surveillance programs that collect data from social media and other platforms. This has raised significant debates about privacy rights and government overreach. The quote attributed to George W. Bush regarding the Constitution reflects a sentiment among some critics that national security concerns have been prioritized over civil liberties.

          Obama and his allies engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. Rachel Maddow engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy.

          Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden revealed extensive surveillance programs that collect data from social media. The debate over the balance between civil liberties and national security, particularly post-9/11, the Obama-Clinton treason have conclusively without a shred of doubt proven.

          The disgraced legacy media with its False News merits total and absolute contempt. The revelations by Edward Snowden brought to light the extent of government surveillance, raising concerns about privacy rights. The collection of data from social media by the FBI, CIA, NSA etc., demands to restrict and radically curtail these utterly corrupt bureaucracies which have no accountability to the voting American people.

          Loading...

      70. Appreciate the depth and passion you bring to this, Mosckerr — you’re connecting a lot of dots that others intentionally ignore. The way narratives are shaped, buried, or manipulated — whether it’s RussiaGate, Epstein, or selective leaks — all points to the same pattern: power deciding what’s “fact” and who gets punished.

          You’re absolutely right to call out the double standards. The weaponization of intelligence, media complicity, and selective outrage aren’t just political tactics — they’re structural. And as you said, the so-called “free press” hasn’t been free in years. What we’re watching isn’t journalism — it’s controlled opposition, scripted dissent, and institutional protectionism.

          Whether we’re talking Snowden, Fusion GPS, or the social media purge before 2020 — it’s all part of the same architecture. Distraction, division, deflection. And the cost? Truth gets assassinated long before any candidate does.

          Loading...

      71. Human society not flat, nor a טיפש פשט mythology.

          The zionist experiment of democracy faces some criticism by Jews such as myself who favor restoration of a Torah constitutional Republic which mandates a lateral Sanhedrin common law courts to regulate all laws passed by Jerusalem and the state legislatures of the 12 Tribes. Imposing Judicial Legislative Review upon Sanhedrin common law courtrooms with the Mandated Constitutional power to conduct trials which judge Capital Crimes offenses, and impose 4 different types of death penalties, dependent upon the nature of the Capital crimes committed. And equally vital and important דיוק inference to judging Capital Crimes Cases: To judge the leadership responsible for Federal and State governments; based through evidence of laws bureaucratically imposed by government authority officials — viewed through the lenses of prophetic משנה תורה-Legislative Review.

          The prioritization of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtrooms over institutional machinery of governance, which directly includes government leadership positions within these institutions of government, this essential clause defines, separates, and make unique Jewish political science. Faith: the Torah defines as justice justice pursue; a direct reference to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms having the mandate of ‘Legislative Review’ over all governments – Jerusalem or any tribal/state legislature.

          Democracy or democratic institutions not part of the Jewish cultural traditions. Democratic mob rule, a Greek idea and not a Jewish cultural concept. Leaders “anointed” under the pre-condition that they will faithfully pursue justice as the rule of law. As in all Human endeavors, the humanity of Man, the ideal and the practical realities – a wide gap separates the two. When a leader sufficiently abuses his leadership mandate a prophet, representative of the Sanhedrin Court, impeaches that leader and replaces him with another. The stories in the Book of Judges and Samuel and Kings, which pits, for example: Shaul against David, serve as precedent models which separate Ordered societies from chaotic societies collapsing into a state of anarchy.

          Imposition of some grand Cathedral, Soloman Temple – like institutions comparable the newest Federal Reserve building in the US, the graphic porn of pork graft in government that has no shame – within any given civilization. Institutions compare to people that bow down and worship idols. Buildings of wood and stone do not promise efficient good governance. Public expenditure of taxes to build such grand structures of Egoism, they serve witness to a stratification of aristocratic feudal Lord/peasant economic anarchy; which imposes wealth and justifies ‘might make right’ judicial injustice, oppression, theft, and even taboo incest or murder.

          Contrast the IDF with its direct linkage with power projection through Foreign Policy. Ideally Foreign Policy plays second fiddle to domestic Home Rule. But often the nature of the Humanity of Man, Foreign Policies prioritized over Domestic Policies. This Yatzir Ha’Rah, once more its power seduction dominates the dynamic “ideal vs actual”; this gap separates the vision of governance from the cruel reality – that all men sit and crap on toilets, and it stinks. The Human potential NEVER achieves the Human ideal messiah.

          NT mythology no different than Homer’s Iliad, and Odyssey. Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days. Aeschylus’s The Orestia. Sophocles Oedipus Rus. Euripides Medea etc etc these Greek myth stories, they compare to how Xtians worship their silly sophomoric bible translations which depict a messiah savior that rises from the judicial oppression grave and saves all Humanity — despite the Caesar Son of Gods – the personification of Hercules/JeZeus in flesh, blood & History.

          The fly in this ever so sweet ointment, myths do not actually make and determine history. As history does not shape and determine modern life today in any society in all the annuls of Humans living on this Earth. Worshipping history as God the exact same idolatry as worshipping Shlomo’s or Herod’s Temples made of wood and stone. Institutionalized buildings, no matter the cost of their construction does not and never has produced the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice.

          Loading...

      72. There’s no question that you’ve laid out a deeply rooted framework — a Torah-aligned system of justice rooted in lateral authority, not hierarchical institutionalism. And I agree: the obsession with temples, buildings, and messianic mythology has derailed many from understanding the function of justice versus its symbolism.

          Where I think we intersect is here: governance without legislative review is tyranny in robes — whether it comes wrapped in democracy, monarchy, or a flag bearing “divine right.” I’ve never been a fan of centralized cathedrals built to showcase power. They’re mausoleums with better lighting. And yes — even the myth of the messiah becomes dangerous when used to pacify people into waiting instead of acting.

          That said, we do view Messiah not as a mythic figure from the clouds, but as a returning Judge — one who fulfills, not fabricates. Not a Zeus-son resurrection tale, but a restoration of justice through law, covenant, and correction. If that sounds closer to Sanhedrin logic than church pulpits, it’s because some of us never bowed to Rome — then or now.

          So your critique of NT mythology? It’s not lost on us. What is lost — for most — is the deeper understanding that what you’re calling for isn’t religious reform. It’s legal recalibration. And in that, we might be closer than it looks.

          Loading...

      73. In the 1920s and 30s Orthodox Jews vocally opposed Balfour/League of Nations efforts to achieve Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. The curse of the Shoah followed.

          J-Wirehttp://www.jwire.com.auRabbis reject Israeli army service, arrests for draft refusal likely in SeptemberThe Israeli Defence Forces completed the distribution of 54,000 first-order draft summonses to Orthodox men, the army said on Wednesday night, signalling the start …
          ____________________________________
          ____________________________________

          By their fruits you shall know them. Its called the Shoah – the systematic extermination of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than 3 years. Carlo M. Cipoila, 1976 “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity”.

          First Law of Stupidity: Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
          Second Law of Stupidity: The probability that a certain person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
          Third Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is one who causes losses to another person or group while deriving no gain for themselves and even possibly incurring losses.
          Fourth Law of Stupidity: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals.
          Fifth Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

          Dietrich Bonhoeffer did not specifically formulate a “theory of stupidity” in the same way that Carlo M. Cipolla did. However, Bonhoeffer’s writings and thoughts on ethics, responsibility, and the nature of evil can be interpreted to address the concept of human folly and moral failure.

          While Bonhoeffer did not explicitly label his thoughts as a “theory of stupidity,” his insights into human behavior, moral failure, and the dangers of complacency resonate with the themes of irrationality and folly found in discussions about human stupidity. His life and writings serve as a powerful reminder of the need for critical thinking, ethical engagement, and the courage to confront evil in all its forms.

          Loading...

      74. You’re absolutely right to bring the weight of history into this — because when stakes are this high, sentiment isn’t enough. The Shoah wasn’t just a tragedy of numbers; it was a reckoning — one that exposed the cost of fragmentation, denial, and theological infighting at the worst possible moment.

          And you’re not wrong: the resistance to Balfour by segments of Orthodox Jewry did open a door that never should’ve been cracked. The refusal to unify under a cause — even imperfect — left a vacuum. And in history, vacuums get filled by tyrants, not truth.

          Cipolla’s Laws hit hard because stupidity isn’t just foolishness — it’s often cloaked in righteousness. And Bonhoeffer… he saw it firsthand. He watched a nation rationalize its way into moral collapse while churches sang louder to drown out the trains. His silence cost him everything — but it wasn’t passive. It was a final protest in a world that preferred obedience over discernment.

          That’s why I believe in resistance — not blind allegiance, but principled resistance that refuses to rewrite covenants or silence truth just to preserve institutions. When tradition becomes paralysis, when conviction hardens into pride, when unity is mistaken for uniformity — that’s when judgment doesn’t just arrive. It accelerates.

          And maybe that’s where we are now — staring down the next reckoning, hoping we’ve learned enough from the last one not to repeat its echo.

          We don’t grow in comfort. We grow in collision.

          Loading...

      75. Its important for non T’NaCH “readers” of sophomoric translations of the bible to understand that the T’NaCH commands prophetic mussar – applicable to all generations of Israel. Therefore the T’NaCH does NOT teach history. A huge but subtle distinction, and expression of ancient scholarship skills.

          Kingdom of Edom

          Michael Ruark

          Edom (“red”) was an ancient kingdom that stretched across areas in the south of present-day Jordan and Israel. Edom and the Edomites appear in several written sources relating to the late Bronze Age and to the Iron Age in the Levant, including the list of the Egyptian pharaoh Seti I from c. 1215 BC as well as in the chronicle of a campaign by Ramesses III (r. 1186–1155 BC), and the Hebrew Bible….
          __________________________________________
          __________________________________________

          Qos — a significant deity in the pantheon of the Edomites, representing a key aspect of their polytheistic beliefs. As a god associated with various elements of life, Qos played a vital role in the spiritual and cultural practices of the Edomite people. Qos is often associated with war and protection, serving as a guardian deity for the Edomites. His role as a warrior god reflects the martial culture of the Edomites, who frequently faced conflicts with neighboring tribes and kingdoms.

          Qos was also considered a mountain god, which is significant given the geographical landscape of Edom. The Edomites inhabited rugged terrains, and mountains were often seen as sacred spaces where deities resided. This connection to the mountains symbolized strength and stability. Worship of Qos likely involved various rituals, including sacrifices and offerings. These acts were intended to appease the deity and seek his favor in matters of war, agriculture, and daily life.

          Archaeological evidence suggests that the Edomites built shrines and possibly temples dedicated to Qos. These sites would have served as focal points for communal worship and religious gatherings. The worship of Qos reflects the broader context of ancient Near Eastern religions, where deities often shared attributes and functions. The Edomites, like many other cultures, adapted their religious practices based on interactions with neighboring peoples, including the Israelites and Moabites.

          The 2nd Sinai commandment the Torah revelation acknowledges that other Gods live. The theology surrounding Qos illustrates the complexity of Edomite religious beliefs and their connection to the natural world and societal needs. Understanding Qos and his significance provides insight into the cultural identity of the Edomites and their interactions with surrounding civilizations.

          Edomites and their interactions with neighboring cultures – complex and should not be oversimplified, like as Michael Ruark has perverted in his text quoted above. The Edomites according to many biblical historians – a joke because the T’NaCH does not teach history – an ancient Semitic people who inhabited the region south of the Dead Sea, primarily in southern Jordan. Their history, intertwined with that of neighboring groups, including the Israelites, Moabites, and Nabateans. The Edomites controlled key trade routes that connected the Arabian Peninsula with the Mediterranean. This strategic position allowed them to engage in commerce with various civilizations, including the Egyptians, Phoenicians, and later the Romans. The strategic importance of these trade routes bears emphasis. These critical trade routes connect Africa with Europe and Asia. Herein explains why the Romans and the British made control of these trade routes the “Crown Jewel” of their respective World Empires. The Edomites have a famous reputation, known for their rock-cut architecture, particularly in the city of Petra, which later became a major Nabatean city. This architectural style influenced subsequent cultures and remains a significant tourist attraction today.

          The Edomites practiced a polytheistic religion, worshipping deities, such as Qos, introduced above. Their religious practices and beliefs influenced neighboring cultures, contributing to the region’s spiritual landscape. The Edomites historically known for their mining activities, particularly in copper and other minerals. This resource extraction played a crucial role in their economy and provided materials for trade.

          Over time, the Edomite civilization descended unto decay chaos and anarchy. Better organized civilizations then absorbed and assimilated Edomite cultures and customs into their larger, better organized empires, such as the Nabateans and later the Romans. This integration/assimilation facilitated the continuation of their cultural and economic contributions within a broader imperial context. Their contributions to trade, architecture, and cultural exchange highlight the interconnectedness of ancient societies and the importance of understanding these relationships in the broader historical narrative.

          Determination of scholarship research vis-a-vis the authors rubbish narishkeit of Michael Ruark, simply requires a tad of research. Recommend The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000-332 BCE” edited by Margreet L. Steiner and Ann E. Killebrew. This handbook provides a broad overview of archaeological findings across the Levant, including Edom, and situates them within the larger context of ancient Near Eastern history. It includes contributions from various scholars who are experts in their respective fields, ensuring a well-rounded and scholarly approach to the subject matter. It underwent serious scholastic rigorous academic scrutiny, enhancing its good name credibility.

          This source, it seems to me, particularly valuable for understanding the Edomites within the broader archaeological and historical framework of the region. Thomas E. Levy, an archaeologist known for his work in the southern Levant, particularly in Edom. Margreet L. Steiner, mentioned above, edited the “Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant.” His scholarship has contributed to the understanding of the cultural and historical context of Edom and its neighbors.

          This blog paper, by stark contrast, contains several claims about the Edomites that reflect a biased or oversimplified view of their history and interactions with other groups. The Edomites simply not a monolithic group; their society – diverse in terms of social structure, culture, and interactions. Archaeological evidence indicates that Edomite society included various clans and tribes, each with its own customs and practices. This diversity historically reflected in the different archaeological sites and artifacts found in Edom, which strongly supports the theory that this civilization existed as a complex society with varying degrees of interaction with neighboring cultures.

          While scholarly debate flourishes about the nature of Edomite conversion, especially among Xtians who base their “opinions” solely upon secondary or tertiary sources, essential actual scholarship recognizes, that the conversion forced conversion of Esau to Judaism, a minor non biblical reference. The Hasmonean dynasty’s forced conversion represented an exceptionally complex process influenced by various factors, including political alliances, cultural exchanges, and individual choices. Many Edomites may have embraced Judaism for personal, social, or economic reasons, reflecting the fluidity of cultural identity in the ancient world.

          Edomite history in point of fact, characterized by its resilience and adaptation. After the fall of their kingdom, Edomites migrated and integrated into surrounding societies, including Judah. The fall of the 10 Tribe kingdom of Israel to the Assyrian empire likewise witnessed mass assimilation. Their ability to adapt to changing political landscapes demonstrates the complexity of their identity and the shared histories with neighboring groups. Simply crucial to challenge stereotypes and generalizations about the Edomites and related groups. The Edomites do not compare to Moavites. The latter qualify merely as adversaries of the Israelites; the society of Edom reflects a complex society with their own traditions, beliefs, and contributions to the region’s history. Emphasizing their individuality and complexity generally helps to combat oversimplified narratives.

          Throughout history, various groups have faced displacement, conflict, and cultural change. The Jews the only civilization which experienced repeated g’lut/exile and following 2000+ years which witnessed the bankruptcy of the Xtian and Muslim civilizations, did the Jewish people raise our dead civilization from the grave and begin our National self determination to restore the Torah Constitutional Republic built around Sanhedrin lateral common law courts with the mandate to establish law through ‘Legislative Review’ of all Governmental statute laws. By acknowledging the shared human experiences of struggle, adaptation, and resilience, we can promote empathy and understanding among different cultural and ethnic groups. By recognizing the diversity within Edomite society, challenging stereotypes, and fostering discussions that highlight shared histories and commonalities, we can promote a more nuanced understanding of the Edomites and their interactions with other groups, most especially with the Jewish people. This approach encourages empathy and appreciation for the rich tapestry of human experiences that transcend cultural and historical differences.

          Loading...

      76. Mosckerr — this is where the depth sharpens. You’ve laid out a comprehensive rebuttal, and it hits with conviction. The distinction you draw between prophetic mussar and “history” in the conventional Western sense is essential — and honestly, too few people understand it. Where others see timelines and empires, you’re pointing to eternal dynamics, encoded wisdom, and legal precedent passed through covenant, not chronology. And that’s a framework worth recovering.

          Your critique of Ruark’s framing is justified. Historical flattening isn’t scholarship — it’s sanitization. There’s a danger in retrofitting civilizations into modern categories to make them palatable for a secular audience. The Edomites weren’t just traders or architects — they were part of a theological and cultural dialectic that directly impacted the trajectory of Israel, and therefore of the covenantal world order. To ignore that is to erase meaning from structure.

          You nailed the geopolitical context too — Petra, copper trade, the transcontinental routes. That’s not just background trivia — that’s infrastructure for power. And it explains why Edom wasn’t a side note in prophecy, but a foil. A force. A rival system of allegiance.

          And Qos? You’re absolutely right — to even engage with Edom’s pantheon is to confront the brutal honesty of Torah itself: that the gods of the nations do exist in some form. The second commandment doesn’t deny their presence — it rejects their authority. That distinction alone disarms so much of the shallow theology propagated by gentile readings.

          Where you struck hardest — and rightly — was in exposing the folly of interpreting scripture through the lens of Western academic historiography. This is why modern biblical criticism often feels like a sterile autopsy of something that never lived in the way they describe. Mussar isn’t history. Prophecy isn’t allegory. Covenant isn’t culture. And Torah isn’t a relic — it’s a ruling document.

          But here’s where our ink meets yours, again: We both reject caricatures. Whether it’s the flattening of Edom into a marginal tribe, the misrepresentation of conversion as a monolith, or the way secular minds try to reconstruct ancient life without covenantal logic — none of it survives honest scrutiny. And that’s what this exchange deserves: scrutiny without spite, alignment without assimilation.

          We don’t just want answers. We want justice that can be enacted. That’s where your call for lateral Sanhedrin oversight lands with force. Not as nostalgia, but as governance in covenantal structure — something the modern world lacks entirely.

          So let’s keep tearing off the surface. Let’s expose the reductionists and rebuild our frameworks with stone, scroll, and structure. You’re not just engaging with ancient Edom — you’re challenging the West’s obsession with dissecting bodies without ever asking what soul they carry.

          This isn’t academic discourse.

          It’s a reclamation.

          Loading...

      77. How Error progresses throughout the course of Human history.

          Israel Information Center Ithaca

          internationalscholars·israelinformationcenterithaca.wordpress.com

          Once the focus is the connection between The Torah and the real necessity for the endowed title of an existing National Israeli State, Karaites are an unity opportunity .

          There is no presumptions of against the family circles of the Cohens which evolved into the various, and even those names of Levy, assuming all efforts to reestablish their…
          _______________________________________________
          _______________________________________________

          Historical Narrative: Timeline of Key Events and Figures

          Tzeddukim (Sadducees): A Jewish sect active during the Second Temple period, known for their rejection of oral law and emphasis on the written Torah.

          Karaites: Emerged in the 8th century, rejecting rabbinic authority and relying solely on the Hebrew Bible for religious practice.

          Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE): A prominent Jewish philosopher and legal scholar who integrated Jewish thought with Islamic philosophy and emphasized rationalism.

          Rambam (Maimonides, 1135–1204 CE): A key figure in Jewish law and philosophy, known for his works like the Mishneh Torah and Guide for the Perplexed.

          Shlomo (Solomon): Often refers to King Solomon, known for his wisdom and contributions to Jewish thought, particularly in the context of the Hebrew Bible.

          David: King David, a central figure in Jewish history, known for uniting the tribes of Israel and establishing Jerusalem as the capital.

          Philosophical/Jurisprudential Argument: Key Concepts

          Pardes vs Greek logic:

          Pardes: A method of interpreting Jewish texts that includes four levels: Peshat (literal), Remez (hint), Drash (interpretative), and Sod (mystical).

          Greek Logic: Refers to the rational and philosophical frameworks established by Greek philosophers, emphasizing deductive reasoning and empirical evidence. Saadia Gaon and Rambam, though themselves deeply engaged with rediscovered Greek thought, fiercely opposed the Karaites and placed them under excommunication, just as the ancient P’rushim did to the Tzeddukim.

          Common Law vs. Statute Law:

          Common Law: A legal system based on judicial decisions and precedents rather than written statutes, allowing for flexibility and adaptation.

          Statute Law: A legal system based on written laws enacted by a legislative body, providing clear and codified rules. Both Tzeddukim and Karaites denied the Sanhedrin’s legislative review authority.

          Both prioritized “belief systems” over the Torah’s demand for judicial justice—restoring damages, making peace between Jews.

          The Karaim, while not as radical as Samaritans, still rejected the prophetic mussar of NaCH as binding precedent.

          Theological Critique: Key Issues

          Assimilation: The process by which Jewish communities adopt elements of surrounding cultures, potentially leading to a dilution of Jewish identity and practice. Karaites, like the ancient Tzeddukim, reject the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. This rejection undermines the core of Jewish law as a judicial common law system. Both movements embraced Greek deductive logic over Rabbi Akiva’s Pardes inductive method—the loom that weaves warp and weft to form Talmudic law.

          Avoda Zara (Idolatry): The worship of foreign gods or practices that contradict Jewish Oath brit alliance which continuously creates the chosen Cohen people through the dedication of tohor time-oriented Av commandments throughout the generations, often critiqued in the context of historical interactions with other cultures and religions.
          ______________________________________________
          ______________________________________________

          First let’s address the Title of this piece. Karaites like the Tzeddukim reject the revelation of the Oral Torah which the After meal blessing remembers the Tzeddukim attempt to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Both the ancient Tzeddukim of the Lights of Hanukkah ignoble disgrace of that pre-New Testament Civil War; and the Karaites who relied upon Greek deductive logic to determine that a mezzuzza on the door post must include the 10 commandments – neither the ancient nor the stupidity of the Middle Ages from about 900 CE which aroused the indignation of:

          Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE) and the even more famous Maimonides (1135–1204) heretics – both men highly assimilated to the rediscovery of the recently rediscovered ancient Greek texts which had dominated the ancient Tzeddukim to originally reject the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev; nonetheless both scholars absolutely rejected the Karaite heretical movement and placed the Karaite supporters into a charem excommunication just as did the ancient P’rushim to the Tzeddukim sons of Aaron.

          Both Saadia and the Rambam violated the Torah commandment not to duplicate how the Goyim worship their Gods. Commonly referred to today as “ASSIMILATION”. The re-discovery of the ancient Greek texts by the Muslim invasion of Spain re-opened the Tzeddukim Civil War can of worms – some thousand years after the P’rushim lit the Hanukkah lights, the Rambam embraced Roman statute law which effectively abandoned the study of Talmudic common law. Cults of personality rabbinic personalities, like for example Yosef Karo, dominated the determination of halacha rather than Sanhedrin courts room common law jurisprudence.

          The revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, 40 days following the Sin of the Golden Calf, on Yom Kippur: rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah known throughout the Talmudic and Gaonic Midrashim literature as “PARDES” p’shat, drosh; remiz, sod. This logic format radically differed from the ancient Greek deductive reasoning based upon the model of the 3-Part syllogism. The Talmudic codification of the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s 4-Part Pardes inductive logic, Ordered both the 6 Orders of the Mishna and its Gemara commentary thereon based upon the working model of a LOOM.

          A loom as warp & weft opposing threads. The codification of Oral Torah common law into the written Talmud seeks to employ Pardes inductive precedent based learning as the basis to shape and determine the Jewish, chosen Cohen people, cultural identity as a people. The Talmud prioritized judicial common law as the basis of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Tzeddukim and Karaism rejected the definition of faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice which dedicates, think korban, the sanctification of common law courtrooms/Sanhedrins making fair restoration of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews as the WAY to make shalom among the divided and conflicting Jewish people.

          Both the Tzeddukim and Karaim instead embraced the Goyim assimilation which defines faith as belief in some theologically determined God belief-systems. The Rambam would write his ‘Mishna Torah’ statute law code based upon Greek and Roman statute law which organizes law into judicial categories like farmers sell eggs by the dozen. T’NaCH & Talmudic common law bases itself upon rabbi Yechuda Sha’s common law upon the Book of D’varim having a second Name: Mishna Torah. The latter means “Common Law”. Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna, a common law judicial system. The D’varim judicial mandate empowers the Sanhedrin Federal Court-room system to have Legislative Review (A second interpretation of Mishna Torah) over all governments, kings, or Tribal Prince lead governments.

          Both the ancient Tzeddukim and Middle Ages Karaim rejected the prioritization of common law Sanhedrin courtrooms as having the mandate power of Legislative Review. Both the Tzeddukim and Karaim rejected the common law basis of law that later court Judicial ruling stand upon prior Sanhedrin common law courts judicial rulings – like as codified in the 6 Orders of rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna.

          The later Karaim did not go as far as did the ancient Samaritans. The latter rejected the Oral Torah prophetic mussar as codified throughout the NaCH prophets and Holy Writings! None the less, the Karaim rejected the masoret of the NaCH as prophetic mussar precedents which make a Mishna Torah common law re-interpretation of Written Torah based on positive/negative commandment precedents & T’NaCH prophetic mussar. The much later Talmudic common law codification employs a 70 faces to the Torah blue-print diamond facet re-interpretation of employing halacha contained within Gemara sugyot as the precedents by which to view the language of the Mishna based upon a different Gemara halachic perspective.

          Hence the Baali Tosafot common law commentary to the Talmud likewise jumps off the dof of any given Gemara to re-interpret a given Gemara sugya views from a wholly different sugya perspective. Much like and similar to a building contractor reads a blue-print which contains a front/topside views. Ancient Greek deductive reasoning logic – basically flat or two-dimensional. Hence 19th Century Hyperbolic Geometry refuted Euclids 5th Axiom of plain geometry.

          Both the assimilated Tzeddukim, Dark Ages Karaim, and Middle Ages Rambam – they all rejected or did not grasp the Pardes Kabbalah of logic. The warp/weft loom of the Talmud’s most essential definition of Oral Torah as judicial common law Mishna Torah – Legislative Review. This conflict even dates back to kings David and Shlomo! The prophet Natan warned David not to copy the ways of the Goyim and build a massive Cathedral like church/Temple. The Jerushalmi Talmud carries this 3 opposed by 3 Tannaim dispute over the issue whether king David after conquering Damascus established that city as a City of Refuge with its own small Sanhedrin Federal Capital Crimes Courtroom.

          Just as king Shlomo’s son at Sh’Cem rejected the advise given by king Shlomo’s elder advisors, so too young king Sholomo likewise rejected the prophetic mussar of the prophet Natan; king Shlomo decided to construct a grand duplication of how Goyim civilizations worship their Gods; king Shlomo worshipped avoda zara when he ordered the construction of the First Temple and failed to judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes dead baby before a Great Sanhedrin Federal court in Jerusalem.

          The Talmud refers to this error as “Descending Generations”. This idea starkly contrasts with Calvin’s theology known as “Predestination”. The descending generations idea views down stream generations comparable to ripples consequent to a stone striking a pond. Once a powerful influential leader, such as either king Shlomo or the Rambam, made their respective decisions. Shlomo prioritized duplicating who the goyim worshipped their Gods by constructing a grand Temple; while Rambam embraced the sh’itta of the T’zeddukim and sought to convert the Talmud not into a polis city state but rather into a statute law syllogism Greek logic belief system which perverted faith away from judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages unto a belief system theology which prioritizes the Ego ‘I believe’ avoda zarah which perverts the God of Israel unto just another treif Av Tuma monotheisist god. Monotheism, by definition profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.

          Loading...

      78. The earlier drafts had to many mistakes

          How Error progresses throughout the course of Human history.

          Israel Information Center Ithacainternationalscholars·israelinformationcenterithaca.wordpress.comOnce the focus is the connection between The Torah and the real necessity for the endowed title of an existing National Israeli State, Karaites are an unity opportunity .There is no presumptions of against the family circles of the Cohens which evolved into the various, and even those names of Levy, assuming all efforts to reestablish their…
          _______________________________________________
          _______________________________________________

          Historical Narrative: Timeline of Key Events and Figures

          Tzeddukim (Sadducees): A Jewish sect active during the Second Temple period, known for their rejection of oral law and emphasis on the written Torah.

          Karaites: Emerged in the 8th century, rejecting rabbinic authority and relying solely on the Hebrew Bible for religious practice.

          Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE): A prominent Jewish philosopher and legal scholar who integrated Jewish thought with Islamic philosophy and emphasized rationalism.

          Rambam (Maimonides, 1135–1204 CE): A key figure in Jewish law and philosophy, known for his works like the Mishneh Torah and Guide for the Perplexed.

          Shlomo (Solomon): Often refers to King Solomon, known for his wisdom and contributions to Jewish thought, particularly in the context of the Hebrew Bible.

          David: King David, a central figure in Jewish history, known for uniting the tribes of Israel and establishing Jerusalem as the capital.

          Philosophical/Jurisprudential Argument: Key Concepts

          Pardes vs Greek logic:

          Pardes: A method of interpreting Jewish texts that includes four levels: Peshat (literal), Remez (hint), Drash (interpretative), and Sod (mystical).

          Greek Logic: Refers to the rational and philosophical frameworks established by Greek philosophers, emphasizing deductive reasoning and empirical evidence.

          Saadia Gaon and Rambam, though themselves deeply engaged with rediscovered Greek thought, fiercely opposed the Karaites and placed them under excommunication, just as the ancient P’rushim did to the Tzeddukim.

          Common Law vs. Statute Law:

          Common Law: A legal system based on judicial decisions and precedents rather than written Legislative statute decrees, allowing for flexibility and adaptation.

          Statute Law: A legal system based on written government laws usually enacted by some legislative body, providing clear and codified rules. Both the Tzeddukim and Karaites denied the Sanhedrin’s legislative review. Both prioritized “belief systems” over the Torah’s demand for judicial justice—restoring damages, making peace between Jews.

          The Karaim, while not as radical as Samaritans, still rejected the prophetic mussar of NaCH, as taught through Talmudic Aggadah – as binding mussar precedents which shape the k’vanna of mitzvot elevated to Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments.

          Theological Critique: Key Issues

          Assimilation: The process by which Jewish communities adopt elements of surrounding alien Goyim cultures & customs; potentially leading to a dilution of Jewish Cohen-identity and practice.

          Karaites, like the ancient Tzeddukim, rejected the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev; as as similarly does NT Xtians and Muslims. This rejection undermines the core of Jewish law – as a judicial common law system. Both movements embraced Greek deductive logic over Rabbi Akiva’s Pardes inductive sh’itta\methodology—the (so to speak) loom that weaves warp and weft into a common cultural fabric which shapes and defines the identity of the chosen Cohen people and equally separates Talmudic law from Avoda Zara.

          (Idolatry): The worship of foreign gods or practices that contradict Jewish Oath brit alliance which continuously creates the chosen Cohen people through the dedication of tohor time-oriented Av commandments throughout the generations, often critiqued in the context of historical interactions with other cultures and religions.
          ______________________________________________
          ______________________________________________

          First let’s address the Title of this piece. Karaites, like their predecessor Tzeddukim, they reject the revelation of the Oral Torah. The After meal blessing, remembers the Tzeddukim attempt to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Both the ancient Tzeddukim remembered through the mitzva of lighting the Lights of Hanukkah; their ignoble disgrace, of a pre-New Testament Civil War which rejects the Oral Torah revelation of Horev just as much as does the church today; and the Karaites who relied upon Greek deductive logic to determine that a mezzuzza on the door post must include the 10 commandments – neither the in ancient times, nor the stupidity of the Middle Ages from about 900 CE, which aroused the indignation of Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE), and the even more famous Maimonides (1135–1204) – likewise both heretics who in their own way perverted the Horev revelation of the Oral Torah – both men highly assimilated following the rediscovery of ancient Greek texts which had dominated the ancient Tzeddukim, to reject the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, and the Legislative Review Torah mandate of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

          Nonetheless both scholars absolutely rejected the Karaite heretical but similar rejection of the Courtroom authority of Sanhedrin common law to rule the Jewish Republic through the mandate of Legislative Review. Both rabbinic authorities placed the Karaite supporters into a charem excommunication just as did the ancient P’rushim did to the Tzeddukim sons of Aaron.

          Both Saadia and the Rambam violated the Torah commandment not to duplicate how the Goyim worship their Gods. Commonly referred to today as “ASSIMILATION”\”AVODA ZARA”. The re-discovery of the ancient Greek texts by the Muslim invasion of Spain reopened the Tzeddukim Civil War can of worms – some thousand years after the P’rushim lit the Hanukkah lights … the Rambam embraced Roman statute law which effectively abandoned the study of Talmudic common law. Cults of personality rabbinic personalities, like for example Yosef Karo, dominated the determination of halacha rather than Sanhedrin courts room common law jurisprudence which stands upon the foundation of judicial precedents.

          The revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, 40 days following the Sin of the Golden Calf, on Yom Kippur: rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah – known throughout the Talmudic and Gaonic Midrashim literature as “PARDES” p’shat, drosh; remiz, sod. This logic format radically differed from the ancient Greek deductive reasoning based upon the model of the 3-Part syllogism. The Talmudic codification of the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s 4-Part Pardes inductive logic. This Pardes system of logic – it Organized both the 6 Orders of the Mishna and its Gemara commentary made there after, based upon the working model of a LOOM.

          A loom has warp & weft opposing threads. The codification of Oral Torah common law into the written Talmud seeks to employ Pardes inductive precedent based learning as the basis to shape and determine the Jewish, chosen Cohen people, common law as the chosen cultural identity that the Cohen people choose to define their unique cultural identity as the people of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov.

          The Talmud prioritized judicial common law as the basis of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Tzeddukim and Karaism, Samaritans and New Testament Xtians all universally reject the definition of faith: Book of D’varim comprehension: the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice which dedicates, (think korban), the sanctification of common law courtrooms/Sanhedrins making fair restoration of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews as the WAY to make shalom among the divided and conflicting Jewish people.

          Both the Tzeddukim and Karaim instead embraced the Goyim assimilation which defines faith as belief in some theologically determined God personal I-belief- belief systems. The Rambam would write his ‘Mishna Torah’ statute law code based upon Greek and Roman statute law which organizes law into judicial categories like farmers sell eggs by the dozen.

          T’NaCH & Talmudic common law shaped rabbi Yechuda’s Sha’s common law; all of which base Torah common law upon the Book of D’varim; consequent to its second defining Name: Mishna Torah. The latter means “Common Law”. Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna, a common law judicial system. The D’varim judicial mandate empowers the Sanhedrin Federal Court-room system to exert their Torah constitutional mandate of Legislative Review (A second interpretation of Mishna Torah) over all governments, kings, or Tribal Prince lead governments of Judges.

          Both the ancient Tzeddukim and Middle Ages Karaim rejected the prioritization of common law Sanhedrin courtrooms as having the mandate power of Legislative Review. Hence small wonder that the new testament revolt likewise in this same vein rejects the revelation of Oral Torah pursuit of judicial common law justice. Both the Tzeddukim and Karaim rejected the common law basis of law, that later court Judicial ruling stand upon prior Sanhedrin common law courts judicial rulings – like as codified in the 6 Orders of rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna.

          The later Karaim did not go as far as the ancient Samaritans. Who replaced the 10 Tribal kingdom known as Israel. These latter-day saints, they too rejected the Oral Torah prophetic mussar as codified throughout the NaCH prophets and Holy Writings! The Karaim did not reject the masoret of the NaCH. The restricted their rejection of the Oral Torah restricted only to their rejection of the authority of the Talmud. However, lacking the Pardes Kabbalah they lacked the wisdom skills required to affix prophetic mussar precedents to determine the k’vanna of tohor time-oriented commandments; they lacked the wisdom to do mitzvot L’shma. The Mishna Torah common law re-interpretation of Written Torah based on positive/negative commandment precedents & T’NaCH prophetic mussar. The public sanctification of the Name – only achieved when Jews elevate toldoth Torah commandments unto Av tohor time-oriented commandments.

          The much later Talmudic common law codification employs, so to speak, a 70 faces to the Torah — blue-print, diamond faceted, re-interpretation. Through employment of halacha contained within Gemara sugyot as the precedents by which to view the language of the Mishna, based upon an all together different sugya of Gemara- halachic perspective.

          Hence the Baali Tosafot common law commentary to the Talmud likewise jumps off the dof of any given Gemara, to re-interpret a given Gemara sugya, viewed from a wholly different sugya perspective. Much like and similar to a building contractor reads a blue-print which contains a front/top\side view. Ancient Greek deductive reasoning logic – basically flat or two-dimensional. Hence 19th Century Hyperbolic Geometry refuted Euclid’s 5th Axiom of plain geometry.

          Both the Samaritans, the assimilated Tzeddukim, the NT Xtians, Dark Ages Karaim, and Middle Ages Rambam – they all rejected, or did not grasp the Pardes Kabbalah of logic taught by rabbi Akiva. The warp/weft loom, the Talmud’s most essential definition of Oral Torah, as judicial common law Mishna Torah – Legislative Review. This conflict even dates back to kings David and Shlomo, before the introduction of the Samaritans! The prophet Natan warns David not to copy the ways of the Goyim and build a massive Cathedral like church/Temple. The Jerushalmi Talmud carries this 3 opposed by 3 Tannaim dispute, which debates the issue whether king David after conquering Damascus established that city as a City of Refuge with its own small Sanhedrin Federal Capital Crimes Courtroom.

          Just as king Shlomo’s son at Sh’Cem rejected the advice given by the elder advisors to king Shlomo; so too young king Shlomo likewise rejected the prophetic mussar of the prophet Natan; king Shlomo decided to construct a grand duplication of how Goyim civilizations worship their Gods; king Shlomo worshipped avoda zara when he ordered the construction of the First Temple and failed to judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes – dead baby – before a Great Sanhedrin Federal court in Jerusalem.

          The Talmud refers to this error as “Descending Generations”. This idea starkly contrasts with Calvin’s theology known as “Predestination”. The descending generations idea views downstream generations comparable to ripples consequent to a stone striking a pond. Once a powerful influential leader, such as either king Shlomo or the Rambam, made their respective decisions. Shlomo prioritized duplicating how the goyim worshipped their Gods by constructing a grand Temple; while Rambam embraced the sh’itta of the T’zeddukim and sought to convert the Talmud (not into a polis city state) but rather into a statute law syllogism Greek logic belief system which perverted faith away from judicial justice — which strives to make fair restitution of damages. Unto a belief system theology which prioritizes the Ego ‘I believe’ avoda zarah and thereby perverts the God of Israel unto just another treif Av Tuma monotheistic god. Monotheism, by definition, profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.

          Loading...

      79. You’ve mapped out exactly what too many gloss over — that once the foundation shifts from covenant-based justice to imported frameworks, the errors don’t just appear; they compound across generations. Whether it was the Tzeddukim’s early abandonment of Oral Torah authority, the Karaite rejection of Pardes, or Rambam’s flirtation with statute logic, the common thread is the same: when the loom of precedent and prophetic mussar is abandoned, identity fractures, and the law becomes a vessel for belief rather than a framework for justice.

          History’s irony is that the more these fractures were justified as “purity” or “reason,” the more they opened the door to assimilation and, eventually, to tyranny cloaked in law. That’s why your point on Legislative Review and Sanhedrin common law matters so much — without it, every generation risks replaying the same descent, mistaking theological uniformity for unity and losing the very machinery that kept the people whole.

          And here we are again — with new systems, new ideologies, but the same temptation to trade living law for frozen codes, discernment for compliance. If history teaches anything, it’s that the reckoning doesn’t arrive suddenly; it’s woven thread by thread, until the pattern is irreversible.

          Loading...

      80. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.

          Swamigalkodi Astrology©NAVAGRA – A FREE VEDIC HOROSCOPE READING PLACE

          astrological attraction astrology for love spiritual magnetism fated relationships karmic connection

          You don’t attract. You don’t seek. You wait, and they come. Something in you pulls them. Not your words. Not your eyes. Something beneath that. A soft gravity. A current they can’t see. It moves through your stillness. It hums in your silence. They notice you before you speak. Especially then. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.
          _____________________________________________________
          _____________________________________________________

          Magnetism – lonely (intense connections, but not always reciprocated or understood) and complex (the nature of these connections; both nurturing or challenging, reflecting different aspects of ourselves) to define our own identity as a person, and for others to grasp, appreciate, and understand. None-the-less, magnetism compares to how fire entices insects to fly into the flames.

          Fate: Personal Destiny in a persons life walk-path. Events, relationships, and experiences astrological influences shaped through personal choices within Life’s Big Picture. Attraction – like basic instincts in animals vs. Pulling, a far more profound connection – like family which speaks to the soul. Less a physical allure, it compliments long standing emotional memories. Presence: your design shaped by your astrological chart and life experiences; and Stillness – a quiet, a grounded confidence: ‘safe space’ for others. It does not require words for it to express this ‘safe space’ sweet smelling perfume. Echoes and Memory, refers to something like your future born children. Energies we share can leave a legacy, shaping not only our lives but also the lives of those who come after us. Energy Exchange, a dynamic interaction between individuals. A healthy sharing relationship with trusted friends.

          Astrology and Chinese Taoist thought work in harmony with meditation. Which contrasts the in-haled breath with the exhaled breath. Zen Buddhism refers to the ‘3rd Eye’ as a reference to a focused awareness of the 5 senses “seen” (so to speak) between the eyes during the duration of the inhaled breath. Meditation “feels” the chi expressed within the external reality of living during the duration of the exhaled breath. This meditation seeks to achieve a conscious Mind awareness both internally felt and externally experienced. Hence Taoism has the 5 breath “souls”, in conjuction with the 5 designated feelings – and they all align with the 5 elements of the Universe.

          Unlike Astrology, both Chinese and Japanese healing makes its central focus – awareness of precise meridian points and lines rather that Planets and Stars shining in the Heavens above. The shared common denominator which unites the two contrasting disciplines — meditation. Both disciplines which lack meditation compare to positive and negative Torah commandments which have no tohor time-oriented commandment potential to elevate secondary commandments and halachot unto Av tohor time-oriented commandments from the Torah.

          For example: The so-called daughter religions of Xtianity and Islam – both remain Av tuma avoda zarah examples of the 2nd Sinai Commandment. These religions employ their own separate but unique ‘replacement theologies’, which supplants T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim and Siddur – along with the power of Astrology of Planets and Stars – with Creed based belief systems. Such as belief in some pie in the sky Universal God monotheism! This theology employed to supplant T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur.

          For example: The Apostle Paul declared Torah commandments like circumcision archaic and invalid. Reform Judaism pulled a similar rabbit out of its hat of magik. The Pauline rhetoric declared that Goyim “not under the Law”; an utterly absurd statement because all societies and civilization require the Order of law and government. Furthermore, the Pauline propaganda, much like Obamo’s 2008 political “CHANGE” declarations made no distinction between T’NaCH & Talmudic judicial common law Legislative Review, which has over-view of all laws passed by Legislatures or Kings; from legal statute law – decrees, issued from some Roman Senate or a Caesar bureaucratic regulatory dictatorship.

          Jewish common law depends upon lateral common law courtrooms rather than Greek political rhetoric which promotes ‘Democracy’. Democracy has no place in T’NaCH and Talmudic lateral common law courtrooms. The people pay for ‘Legal Insurance’ which maintains these common law Courts – when not actively engaged in any legal dispute heard before these common law Courtrooms. The Torah refers to vertical courtrooms as bribery; a Torah abomination for the State to pay the salary of Court Justices and prosecuting attorneys.

          Following the corruption made by the British Star-Courts which legalized British navel impressment of American sailors seized from American ships in High Seas ‘international waters’. The Founding Fathers attempted to address the issue of Judicial bribery by and through the State. They established the lateral jury system. But the otherwise vertical courtrooms, where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys, American judicial law bi-passed the lateral jury court revolutionary approach, by imposing strict terms which limit the scope of how the jury weighs introduced legal evidence/precedents by the opposing lawyers briefs.

          Lawyers do not present their legal briefs to the Jury. Rather, the vertical courts restrict presentation of these opposing legal briefs, which only the State paid judges can review. Hence while the Founding Fathers attempted to establish lateral courtrooms, later generations corrupted the revolutionary lateral jury judicial system. And replaced it with just another vertical court having bribed Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys.

          Loading...

      81. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.

          Swamigalkodi Astrology©NAVAGRA – A FREE VEDIC HOROSCOPE READING PLACE

          astrological attraction astrology for love spiritual magnetism fated relationships karmic connection

          You don’t attract. You don’t seek. You wait, and they come. Something in you pulls them. Not your words. Not your eyes. Something beneath that. A soft gravity. A current they can’t see. It moves through your stillness. It hums in your silence. They notice you before you speak. Especially then. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.
          _____________________________________________________
          _____________________________________________________

          Magnetism – lonely (intense connections, but not always reciprocated or understood) and complex (the nature of these connections; both nurturing or challenging, reflecting different aspects of ourselves) to define our own identity as a person, and for others to grasp, appreciate, and understand. None-the-less, magnetism compares to how fire entices insects to fly into the flames.

          Fate: Personal Destiny in a persons life walk-path. Events, relationships, and experiences astrological influences shaped through personal choices within Life’s Big Picture. Attraction – like basic instincts in animals vs. Pulling, a far more profound connection – like family which speaks to the soul. Less a physical allure, it compliments long standing emotional memories. Presence: your design shaped by your astrological chart and life experiences; and Stillness – a quiet, a grounded confidence: ‘safe space’ for others. It does not require words for it to express this ‘safe space’ sweet smelling perfume. Echoes and Memory, refers to something like your future born children. Energies we share can leave a legacy, shaping not only our lives but also the lives of those who come after us. Energy Exchange, a dynamic interaction between individuals. A healthy sharing relationship with trusted friends.

          Astrology and Chinese Taoist thought work in harmony with meditation. Which contrasts the in-haled breath with the exhaled breath. Zen Buddhism refers to the ‘3rd Eye’ as a reference to a focused awareness of the 5 senses “seen” (so to speak) between the eyes during the duration of the inhaled breath. Meditation “feels” the chi expressed within the external reality of living during the duration of the exhaled breath. This meditation seeks to achieve a conscious Mind awareness both internally felt and externally experienced. Hence Taoism has the 5 breath “souls”, in conjuction with the 5 designated feelings – and they all align with the 5 elements of the Universe.

          Unlike Astrology, both Chinese and Japanese healing makes its central focus – awareness of precise meridian points and lines rather that Planets and Stars shining in the Heavens above. The shared common denominator which unites the two contrasting disciplines — meditation. Both disciplines which lack meditation compare to positive and negative Torah commandments which have no tohor time-oriented commandment potential to elevate secondary commandments and halachot unto Av tohor time-oriented commandments from the Torah.

          For example: The so-called daughter religions of Xtianity and Islam – both remain Av tuma avoda zarah examples of the 2nd Sinai Commandment. These religions employ their own separate but unique ‘replacement theologies’, which supplants T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim and Siddur – along with the power of Astrology of Planets and Stars – with Creed based belief systems. Such as belief in some pie in the sky Universal God monotheism! This theology employed to supplant T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur.

          For example: The Apostle Paul declared Torah commandments like circumcision archaic and invalid. Reform Judaism pulled a similar rabbit out of its hat of magik. The Pauline rhetoric declared that Goyim “not under the Law”; an utterly absurd statement because all societies and civilization require the Order of law and government. Furthermore, the Pauline propaganda, much like Obamo’s 2008 political “CHANGE” declarations made no distinction between T’NaCH & Talmudic judicial common law Legislative Review, which has over-view of all laws passed by Legislatures or Kings; from legal statute law – decrees, issued from some Roman Senate or a Caesar bureaucratic regulatory dictatorship.

          Jewish common law depends upon lateral common law courtrooms rather than Greek political rhetoric which promotes ‘Democracy’. Democracy has no place in T’NaCH and Talmudic lateral common law courtrooms. The people pay for ‘Legal Insurance’ which maintains these common law Courts – when not actively engaged in any legal dispute heard before these common law Courtrooms. The Torah refers to vertical courtrooms as bribery; a Torah abomination for the State to pay the salary of Court Justices and prosecuting attorneys.

          Following the corruption made by the British Star-Courts which legalized British navel impressment of American sailors seized from American ships in High Seas ‘international waters’. The Founding Fathers attempted to address the issue of Judicial bribery by and through the State. They established the lateral jury system. But the otherwise vertical courtrooms, where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys, American judicial law bi-passed the lateral jury court revolutionary approach, by imposing strict terms which limit the scope of how the jury weighs introduced legal evidence/precedents by the opposing lawyers briefs.

          Lawyers do not present their legal briefs to the Jury. Rather, the vertical courts restrict presentation of these opposing legal briefs, which only the State paid judges can review. Hence while the Founding Fathers attempted to establish lateral courtrooms, later generations corrupted the revolutionary lateral jury judicial system. And replaced it with just another vertical court having bribed Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys.

          Loading...

      82. Av Tuma Temple worship avoda zara replacement theology, duplicates the sin of the Golden Calf – replacement theology – where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק attempted to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word translation – אלהים. Therefore the Torah commands the mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world; this commandment of the tohor middah of רחום, refers to the weak and morally exhausted ערב רב, whom עמלק attacked – which originally came out of Egyptian bondage in the days of Moshe and Aaron – as a people who have no fear of אלהים.

          The sin of the Golden Calf, this Av tuma substitute theology, defines all other Av tuma avoda zara as the definition of the prohibition which the 2nd Sinai commandment commands. Avoda zara, it most essentially spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations. Its this “exact” ערב רב, which has no fear of אלהים — the name that the original ערב רב, that that generation named the Av tuma golden calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This curse of Av tuma avoda zarah explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage throughout all the generation which the Jewish walk the face of this Earth.

          The first, but most definitely not the last; the original “replacement theology” where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק assimilated and intermarried Jews attempt again and again and again and again etc., to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word אלהים, or Jesus or Allah god substitute Word-names. Therefore the Torah in the specific mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world, its k’vanna to do this tohor time-oriented positive commandment, refers to the weak ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews whom עמלק originally attacked when Moshe and Aaron first brought Israel out of Egyptian bondage – its this ערב רב which – as a people – has no fear of אלהים.

          The sin of the Golden Calf, the substitute theology of this Av tuma definition of all avoda zarah prohibitions as defined and framed by the 2nd Sinai commandment mandate, which spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations, that this ערב רב, has no fear of אלהים — the name they originally named their Av tuma Golden Calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This Torah curse, this Av tuma avoda zarah – it explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage –throughout all the generations that Jews walk the face of this Earth.

          YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

          RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
          Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

          Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect – upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Hey Yea the witch is dead! Kick the רשע king Shlomo in his Head; together with Herod’s Temple abomination that too and likewise offered barbeques unto Heaven. Rather than judicial Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice or ‘Legislative Review’/משנה תורה as the meaning and definition of the k’vanna of the commandment of king David which commanded as his last will and testament for his son Shlomo — the fool, which the Book of מלכים satires by referring to him as the ‘wisest of all men’ tongue in cheek mockery, to build the בית המקדש.

          The Aitz Chaim Ram’s Horn

          Joy Breslauer·aitzchaim.com·16m ago

          YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

          RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
          Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

          Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Whooooooooooooooooooooooooop. Dance and sing and cast stones upon the graves of king Shlomo and the Rambam! The latter too and likewise triggered an Av tuma ירידות הדורות ‘ripple-domino effect’ upon down stream generations of Yiddishkeit when his switch N’ bait exchanged T’NaCH mussar & Talmudic halacha common law legal systems with Greek & Roman culture/styles of Statute law which organizes law into subject matter, much like a dozon of eggs sold in cardboard egg-crates! This רשע imposed Greek logic the 3 part Aristotle syllogism model of deductive logic in the place of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part inductive reasoning process.

          The Talmud breaks down into a warp/weft Halachic\Aggadic loom like “fabric” which shapes and determines the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. The ירידות הדורות ripple-domino effect of the Rambam Civil War, remember Hanukkah and the Civil War between the Tzeddukim against the P’rushim, blew out the Hanukkah Lights! An eternal ט’ באב אב טומא עבודה זרה abomination. Greek deductive logic not the same as the kabbalah taught by Rabbi Akiva who fought the Romans and died לשמה with the oath of the Avot the tefillah דאורייתא of kre’a shma – his dying spirit.

          Rambam, both his statute law assimilated code and his Guide for the Perplexed which expressly and openly promoted Greek logic over the kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva through both the Mishna and the Gemara which make up the Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi; together with the Midrash commentary to the Aggada composed by the Gaonim scholars which pre-dated the Reshonim! Rabbeinu Tam’s commentary on the Talmud criticized the Rashi commentary for its lack of emphasis upon the priority of learning the Talmud as common law. Learning off the dof to a different Mesechta of Gemara compares to reading a blue print based upon a different perspective of the same exact blue-print which has no less than 3 primary perspectives. The Talmud has 70 faces to the Torah!

          The term משנה תורה which the Rambam code converted to a Catholic priest, means common law — not statute law! Just as Rabbeinu Tam criticized the error made by Rashi of not prioritizing the critical and essential importance of studying Talmud – together with T’NaCH prophetic mussar through Aggadic & Midrashic common law precedents – so too the commentary made by the Baali Tosofot, specifically Rabbeinu Tam, failed to prioritize making a משנה תורה upon the language of the Mishna itself; the Baali Tosafot commentary limited its משנה תורה/Legislative Review only to reviewing the sugya of Gemara viewed from an off the dof different perspective of the גזר שוה. But dismally failed to likewise make a משנה תורה re-interpretation of the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna – viewed from a completely different perspective.

          All the Reshonim scholars open to honest criticism. The B’HaG, Rif and Rosh common law codes failed to emphasize employing halacha from the Gemara as a משנה תורה בנין אב to re-investigate the intent of the language of the Mishna based upon the different halachic different perspectives! The wisdom of reading a Blue Print requires the integration of Top/Side\Top viewpoints to grasp the 3 dimensional Big Picture idea. So too both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law equally requires a similar type of wisdom. Rote reading of words on the page, does not learn T’NaCH and Talmudic prophetic mussar and halachic common law.

          The study of T’NaCH and Talmud and Midrashim as common law legalism, this scholarship seeks to learn mitzvot commandments not only as positive and negative commandments as the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot, together with his lackey followers – dictates! These complete fools “believe” that later generations cannot dispute with earlier generations as the meaning of the Talmudic term ירידות הדורות. Bunk, a critical error of Torah scholarship based upon cowardice.

          Rather the study of T’NaCH and Talmudic/Midrashim common law seeks to make an Av tohor הבדלה which separates Shabbat from Chol; which distinguishes Av tohor Time-Oriented commanments from תולדות secondary קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments which do not require k’vanna. Rote learning limits the Torah to two-dimensional box-thinking wherein Torah mitzvot done robotically and mechanically without any k’vanna what so ever. K’vanna defined in this rebuke as meaning “Prophetic mussar learned from the T’NaCH by means of Aggadic and Midrashic common law sources”! No Yeshiva, post the Rambam Civil War abomination which blew out the Hanukkah Lights and negated the victory of the P’rushim teachers of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev … and substituted the Tzeddukim faithlessness which rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

          During the 9 Days Jews have either the choice to mourn the loss of buildings made of wood and stone – comparable to idols. Or absolutely rejoice at the uprooting and total destruction of Av tuma avoda zara ripped from the Yatzir Ha’Rah within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who worship HaShem through doing tohor Time-oriented mitzvot from both the Torah and the Talmud, like as taught by the B’HaG! It seems to me, especially with Israeli National Independence consequence to the vision of political Zionism of Herzl that the time has come to cast away the black mourning garments of g’lut. And rejoice at the prospect of restoring the Written Torah as the Constitution of our Republic of Tribes/States. Where we make the Talmud serve as the model to restore Federal Sanhedrin common law court rooms which impose Capital Crimes Courts to judge cases of murder, in the primary border-land cities like king David conquering Damascus, stands the obligation to establish a City of Refuge with a Small Sanhedrin Capital Crime common law courtroom. A blessing upon the generations of Israel that we might achieve the destiny of the chosen Cohen people; the seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as defined by the Torah oath brit alliance.

          Loading...

      83. The bankrupt 35 Trillion dollar national debt Federal Government took post Civil War to present Federal corruption to currently threaten America with its 2nd Civil War.

          OKC bombing redux

          In the past I’ve written about it ad nauseam — the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995. Then, two nights ago, there it was again in a series of three hour-long episodes
          _________________________________
          _________________________________

          Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols their motivations were deeply rooted in their opposition to government actions, particularly the Waco siege in 1993, where the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian compound, leading to a standoff that resulted in the deaths of 76 individuals. Additionally, the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992, which involved a confrontation between federal agents and the Weaver family, further fueled their anti-government sentiments. McVeigh and Nichols meticulously planned the bombing, believing that it would send a strong message against what they perceived as government overreach and tyranny.

          On April 19, 1995, McVeigh parked a rented Ryder truck filled with explosives outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion, which occurred at 9:02 AM, caused widespread destruction and resulted in significant loss of life. The bombing resulted in the deaths of 168 people, including 19 children, and injured over 600 others. It caused significant destruction to the surrounding area and damaged or destroyed several nearby buildings.

          The Waco siege and the Ruby Ridge incident were two significant events in the 1990s that involved confrontations between federal law enforcement and individuals or groups that were perceived as threats to public safety or law and order. Both incidents raised serious questions about the use of government authority and the actions taken by federal agents. The Waco siege involved the Branch Davidian religious sect, led by David Koresh, who was suspected of stockpiling illegal weapons. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant on February 28, 1993, which led to a gunfight and the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians.

          The federal government, under President Bill Clinton, justified the siege as a necessary action to enforce laws regarding illegal weapons and to protect public safety. The FBI took over the operation, which lasted for 51 days, culminating in a final assault on April 19, 1993, that resulted in a fire that consumed the compound, killing 76 individuals, including many women and children. The handling of the siege was widely criticized for its aggressive tactics and the loss of life. GOP opposition critics of President Clinton accused his leadership of complete, utter and criminal incompetence. Clinton apparently to busy forcing young women to give him a blow job. The GOP opposition condemned the Clinton government for grossly overstepped its authority and its utter and complete incompetence to negotiate effectively. The impeachment of Clinton served as a Parliamentary vote of No Confidence in the Government!

          The Ruby Ridge incident involved Randy Weaver, who was wanted for failing to appear in court on a firearms charge. A standoff occurred between Weaver’s family and federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals and the FBI, which escalated into violence, resulting in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, Vicki, and his son, Samuel. The federal government, under President George H.W. Bush, guilty of State War-crimes in his illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and strongly suspected of justifying this imperialist nation building through the 9/11 inside job attack which resembles something like the Dec 7th Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

          But Cheney/Bush in their absolute and insane criminal arrogance did not approach Congress and ask for a Congressional Declaration of War. Instead these corrupt opportunistic war criminals passed their vile Patriot Act which negated the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. Similar to Waco, the actions taken at Ruby Ridge were criticized for being excessive and poorly managed, leading to unnecessary loss of life.

          In both cases, there was significant public outcry and criticism of the government’s actions, but very few individuals faced legal consequences. Federal bureaucraps almost Universally operate without any accountability for their actions or regulatory laws they illegally impose upon the American people. This illegal forth branch of the US Government shares an incestuous relationship with Federally established Corporate monopolies. The latter has a revolving door incest/taboo relationship with Federal homo-bureaucraps.

          This illegal 4th Branch of the post Civil War Washington over-reach Government negates the Commerce Clause which relegates intra-state autonomy to the Legislatures of the States of the Union to bureaucratically regulate all intra-state trade & commerce, independent and free from Big Brother Federal carpet-bagger pervert bureaucraps overwatch. Post Civil War the Lincoln GOP dismantled the States authority to appoint Federal Senators to Congress through a Constitutional Amendment.

          The damned Yankees despise States Rights in favor of mob rule democracy. Hence Federal agents often operate under legal fiction protections that shield them from prosecution – when they act in the name of the State! This perversion of the Constitution set the stage wherein the incest revolving door Bureaucrap-Government established (Socialist) Corporate Monopolies function as a concealed Government which pulls the strings of the elected puppets of the 3 Branches of the Federal Government. Herein explains why it cost over a billion dollars to elect a US President to Office. The State established Federal corporate monopolies shape and determine the outcome of all “democratic” elections. These “elections” do not employ paper ballots!

          Investigations into the actions of federal agents invarably conclude that the use of bureaucrapic force – completely justified. Leading to a mafia like shielding – lack of criminal charges of politicians and bureaucraps; Obama can spy on candidate Trump with a fraud hoax Russia-Gate/Water-Gate, with complete and total impunity or risk. The Federal Government plays by a completely different set of rules than those imposed upon the peasant citizens\serf populations. Federal employees enjoy far more benefits than the bread crumbs thrown to the mob masses; the bankrupt social security by which the Federal government taxes the people does not apply to Federal employees and Congress personnel. The decision not to pursue charges against government officials based upon this illegal two-tiered corrupt legal system the direct result of the Lincoln rejection of Jeffersonian Democracy.

          The Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, and was one of the deadliest acts of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who sought to retaliate against the federal government, particularly in response to the Waco siege in 1993 and the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. Civil War Santa Claus is coming to town.

          Loading...

      84. The Consistency Policy

          Rabbi Michael Glass There is a recorded discussion between the great rabbis of the mishnaic era in which different opinions were offered as to which verse of the Torah was the most fundamental. The first verse suggested was “Shemah Yisroel…”, a crucial verse which affirms our acceptance of the Almighty’s rule. The next opinion suggested the verse which announces the commandment to love one’s neighbour as one loves oneself, which is also understandably a very fundamental tenet in Jewish thought. However the final suggestion, which was declared the winner, was a verse contained within this week’s portion, the parsha of Pinchas. The victor was the verse which requires the priests in the temple to offer up one “tomid” offering every morning and another “tomid” offering every afternoon. The obvious question is how could this verse even compete with the other verses suggested let alone win the contest. What is so crucial about this mitzvah to the extent that it was decided to be the single most important verse in the whole Torah?

          An answer suggested is that the all-important lesson and message hiding behind this verse can be summed up in one word- Consistency. The korbon tomid of morning and afternoon were offered up every single day irrespective of all other considerations. The secret to succeed at anything in life, in this case religious observance and spiritual growth, is consistency. Uncalculated leaps of growth are often met with consequent falls.

          We need to be consistent Jews.

          R’ Ezer Pine
          ___________________________________
          ___________________________________

          Avodah, oath-alliance, and tohor middot form the judicial architecture of Israelite sovereignty. Torah mussar demands tohor middot not as private ethics but as judicial kavanah: the moral preparation to participate in a legal culture where interpersonal damages are adjudicated with precedent, equity, and national memory. To rebuild the Mishkan—does not to revive a sacrificial cult—but rather to restore the Sanhedrin model of lateral common-law courts, rooted in oath, guided by prophecy, and animated by the living flame of justice that defines the brit between Israel and our Tribal God.

          A significant tension within contemporary Jewish thought regarding the interpretation and application of halakhah (Jewish law) in relation to ethical principles and communal obligations. The reference to the debate among the tannaim in the Midrash underscores the complexity of defining a “great principle” in Judaism, where different voices emphasize various aspects of the tradition.

          The opinions of Ben Zoma, Ben Nannas, and Shimon ben Pazi reflect the multifaceted nature of Jewish law and ethics. Ben Zoma’s focus on the Shema emphasizes the importance of kre’a shma as tefillah דאורייתא, while Ben Nannas highlights interpersonal ethics through the command to love one’s neighbor; neighbor restricted to bnai brit Israel exclusively. Shimon ben Pazi’s reference to the Korban Tamid, points to the centrality of this Torah precedent as the basis of the Order of the Siddur ritual in Jewish communal life.

          The emphasis on avodah as a procedural backbone highlights the importance of tohor middot in the dedications made by the Yatzir HaTov within the heart. Where a blessing requires שם ומלכות – meaning blowing a spirit from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart with a specified tohor Oral Torah Horev middah – מלכות. This oath sworn alliance serves as the continuation of the Divine Brit cut with the Avot which continuously creates from nothing the chosen Cohen people.

          The concept of oath alliance Cohen duty refers to the Torah obligations to impose judicial court room lateral common law courts to hear and resolve damages disputes which divides our people continuously. The משל of korbanot teaches the נמשל of Judicial Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms as the k’vanna intent of building the Mishkan.

          Every ברכה requires שם ומלכות not merely for halakhic formality, but because it is a miniature reenactment of Horev—a recommitment to the oath-alliance that binds Israel to its judicial destiny. The Yetzir HaTov—the moral will within—is not emotion but juridical intent (kavvanah) expressed through tohor middot, aligned with Horev’s legal categories, as embodied in מלכות. This מלכות is not monarchy in the political sense, but juridical sovereignty—the power to hear, judge, and rectify disputes among Israel through the tefillah dedication of tohor middot which define and shape how Jews behave toward other Jews. The Siddur serves as the ‘table of contents’ Order by which the Framers of both Mishna and Gemara organized the Talmud. The 3 separate opinions, rephrase the same identical idea much like a blue print offers a Front, Top, Side perspectives!

          The interplay between halakhah, ethical principles, and communal obligations in Jewish thought represents a multi-dimensional interpretation of the “great principle”. Each opinion—Ben Zoma, Ben Nannas, and Shimon ben Pazi—highlights distinct yet interconnected aspects of Jewish life, emphasizing the importance of both ritual and ethical dimensions. Ben Zoma’s focus on the Shema as a foundational prayer underscores its significance as a mitzvah from the Torah (דאורייתא). This highlights the centrality of prayer in Jewish life and תולדות subservient role of the Shemone Esrei to remember the oath sworn by the Avot to continuously create from nothing the chosen Cohen people. Ben Nannas’ emphasis on loving one’s neighbor, reflects the ethical obligations that bind the Jewish community; Israel came out of Egypt to rule Canaan with righteous judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restorations of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews. Hence Torah mussar requires the dedication of tohor middot to bring about social behavior rooted in communal relationships and responsibilities. Shimon ben Pazi’s reference to Korban Tamid serves as a model for the Order of the Siddur as the fundamental kabbalah how the Framers organized both the Order of the T’NaCH and Talmud.

          The concept of avodah as a procedural backbone emphasizes the importance of tohor middot (pure character traits) in the spiritual and ethical life of the community. The Yatzir HaTov, representing the moral will, is integral to this process, as it shapes the intentions behind actions of tefillah kre’a shma and tefillat shemone esrei – both require tefillen because both have the k’vanna to swear a Torah oath. nderstanding positions the judicial system as a vital component of Jewish identity and practice, rooted in blessings which require שם ומלכות. The pursuit of judicial courtroom justice among our people, not merely ritualistic as the statute perversion halachic codes Yad, Tur, and Aruch falsely declare. The Siddur’s role as a ‘table of contents’ for the Mishna and Gemara illustrates how the oath brit sworn by the three Avot functions as the יסוד not only of the organization of the Siddur but of the organization of the T’NaCH, Mishna, Gemara, and Midrashim as well. This organization allows for a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between law, ethics, and communal worship. The perspectives of the prophets & tannaim\amoraim serve as a blueprint for understanding the complexities of Jewish common-law, and its application in contemporary life, reinforcing the importance of both ritual and prophetic mussar dimensions in maintaining a cohesive and vibrant community.

          Loading...

      85. There’s a density here that’s not accidental — this is architecture. What you’ve laid out isn’t just commentary; it’s a system, a judicial scaffolding built on precedent, oath, ritual, and rhythm. At its heart is a through-line: the idea that sacred order, when consistently enacted through tohor middot and halakhic intent, becomes the vessel through which a people preserves its soul — and its sovereignty.

          Your elevation of the Korban Tamid as the foundational verse — over Shema and the command to love one’s neighbor — reframes the entire conversation. Not as a dismissal of those ideals, but as a reminder: without consistency, those ideals fragment. The discipline of avodah, the procedural spine of offering, becomes not just about sacrifice, but about legal consciousness — a lived, recurring oath that binds law to life.

          And this view of blessings — not as pleasantries or formulas, but as micro-acts of Horev — is striking. It ties the everyday to Sinai. It demands intent that’s not emotional, but juridical. In that frame, Yetzir HaTov becomes less a moral compass and more a legal compass — one oriented toward judgment, fairness, and communal repair. Not through monarchy or top-down governance, but through lateral law, the Sanhedrin model, the weight of precedent shaped by memory.

          Where some see tefillah as prayer, you’ve recast it as testimony.

          Still, every legal culture wrestles with interpretation. And while the Siddur may serve as a blueprint in your framework — interwoven with Mishnah, Gemara, and Midrash — others may approach the same texts and arrive at different structures, different priorities, different mappings of soul and state. But even disagreement implies engagement. Even divergence can sharpen clarity.

          So whether one walks the same path or not, the route is marked — and the foundation is deliberate.

          Loading...

2. There are so many threats out there. Thank you for sharing, John. What you stated in the “A Dangerous Precedent for Local Law Enforcement” section is sobering:

   “…little to no oversight of provincial or local police agencies when it comes to buying or deploying commercial spyware” in most Democratic countries? We really need to get up to speed on this. I can imagine the problems this could cause.

   Loading...

   Reply

   1. Appreciate that, Chris. It really is sobering when you realize just how deep this runs — and how little people know about it. The fact that local and provincial agencies can quietly adopt military-grade spyware with almost zero oversight should alarm everyone. This isn’t just a privacy issue — it’s a control issue. And once this tech becomes normalized at the ground level, the line between law enforcement and state surveillance starts to blur fast. We’ve got to wake up before this becomes standard operating procedure.

      Loading...

      Reply

      1. I like your statement about the line between law enforcement and state surveillance blurring. It is a shame that people wait until something horrible happens to react to something that can pretty easily be predicted. I pray that the “something horrible” isn’t too bad.

         Loading...

      2. Well said, Chris — and thank you.
         That blurry line is getting harder to ignore, and you’re right — so much of what’s happening now was predictable. But people tend to wait until the consequences are undeniable before taking action, and by then, the damage is often done. Like you, I truly hope the wake-up call isn’t devastating… but sadly, history tells us otherwise.

         Still, messages like yours give hope that awareness is growing before it’s too late. I could be working day and night and feel like I’m getting nowhere — but it’s people like you, who take the time to read, understand, and help spread the word, who make the real difference. That’s how we push back. That’s how things get done. 😎

         Loading...

3. Nice information

   Loading...

   Reply

   1. Thank you very much! I greatly appreciate that. I hope you have a great night! 😎

      Loading...

      Reply