Thank you for reading or listening to The Realist Juggernaut. Independent journalism should be accessible to everyone.
What began as a way to connect people has become a commercial scoring structure that determines who is visible, who receives opportunity and who is quietly pushed outside the digital public square
People continue calling Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn and X social-media platforms. That description no longer captures what these systems have become.
A social platform would allow people to publish material and reach those who voluntarily chose to follow them. Today’s largest platforms place an automated decision-maker between the publisher and the audience. Following an account no longer guarantees that its posts will appear. Creating strong work does not guarantee distribution. Building an audience does not guarantee access to that audience.
Every post enters a private evaluation system. Algorithms predict whether people will stop, read, watch, reply, repost, share, open a profile, follow an account or remain on the platform. Those predictions determine which voices rise, which remain contained and which disappear without a formal notice.
Users may believe they are participating in open social networks. In reality, they are operating inside privately governed attention markets where visibility is scored, restricted and sold.
X’s Phoenix System Exposes the Direction
X’s updated For You architecture is centered on a transformer model called Phoenix. The system gathers recent posts from followed accounts through Thunder and discovers outside-network posts through Phoenix Retrieval and SimClusters.
Phoenix does not simply arrange posts chronologically. It predicts the probability that a particular viewer will perform specific actions.
Those actions include replying, reposting, quoting, sharing through direct messages, copying a link, opening media, visiting a profile, following an author and spending time with the post. It also predicts negative responses, including selecting “Not interested,” muting an account, blocking an account, reporting content or leaving without meaningful attention.
The predicted probabilities are combined with action weights to create a ranking score. Additional systems apply author-diversity adjustments, outside-network discounts, new-author boosts and similarity reranking. Visibility systems can permit a post, place it behind an interstitial or remove it from recommendation.
X also introduced a confirmed boost for original posts from accounts that follow each other. That change increases the importance of established relationships, particularly when the system predicts that a viewer will reply. It does not guarantee distribution, and it does not apply equally to replies or reposts.
The result is not a neutral feed. It is a behavioral prediction engine deciding which communication has sufficient platform value to deserve attention.
X deserves recognition for publishing more of its architecture than several competitors. Transparency does not make the underlying power structure fair. It allows the public to see more clearly how deeply automated judgment has entered ordinary communication.
This Is Larger Than X
Facebook’s Feed is also selected, ranked and delivered through artificial intelligence. A person may deliberately follow a news organization, business or public figure and still receive only a fraction of that account’s posts.
Facebook combines material from friends, groups, Pages, recommendations and advertisers. Its systems decide which content receives limited feed space. Businesses that cannot generate immediate engagement may be pushed below entertainment, personal updates and paid promotions.
Instagram evaluates predicted interest across Feed, Stories, Explore and Reels. Viewing time, sharing, saving, relationship history and previous activity affect distribution. Creators are repeatedly pushed toward the formats receiving the strongest platform support, regardless of whether those formats fit their work.
TikTok operates one of the most powerful behavioral-feedback systems in the industry. It evaluates viewing completion, rewatches, sharing, comments, searches, sounds, captions and other interactions. A creator can reach an enormous audience without possessing a large following, but that discovery can disappear as rapidly as it arrived. The creator does not own the distribution pathway.
YouTube uses viewing history, search history, subscriptions, positive and negative reactions, satisfaction surveys and watch behavior to determine recommendations. It offers greater long-term discovery through search and older videos, but creators still face pressure to produce thumbnails, titles and openings designed to win immediate selection and retain attention.
LinkedIn analyzes professional identity, employment context, skills, network relationships, subject matter and activity. Its systems do not merely evaluate a post. They also assess whether the author appears professionally relevant to the subject. That creates another form of algorithmic authority: the platform determines who appears qualified before the broader audience gets an opportunity to decide.
Each company uses different terminology. The governing principle remains consistent. Automated systems score people, content, relationships and behavior before allocating visibility.
The Private Social-Credit Comparison
These platforms do not currently operate one universal government social-credit score. That distinction must remain clear.
They do operate private scoring systems capable of producing similar functional consequences within their ecosystems.
They determine:
- Whose posts receive distribution
- Which accounts appear credible
- Who qualifies for monetization
- Which content is eligible for recommendation
- Which behavior reduces future visibility
- Which relationships receive greater weight
- Who can purchase expanded reach
- Which publishers remain trapped inside their existing audiences
- Who receives meaningful appeal rights
- Which accounts become economically viable
A visible numerical score is unnecessary. The consequences can be imposed silently through recommendation, monetization, search placement, advertising eligibility, account restrictions and reduced distribution.
A person may never be told that an internal model considers an account less valuable, less trustworthy or less engaging. The person only sees falling impressions, weak discovery and declining revenue.
That is what makes private algorithmic scoring especially powerful. The judgment can exist without being disclosed. The punishment can occur without being formally identified as punishment.
Wealth Creates Algorithmic Credit
The system is not economically neutral.
Established corporations, celebrities, major publishers and wealthy creators enter the algorithmic marketplace with significant advantages:
- Large existing audiences
- Immediate engagement
- Recognizable names
- Professional production teams
- Advertising budgets
- Dedicated social-media employees
- Influencer partnerships
- Cross-platform promotion
- Extensive behavioral histories
- Direct platform relationships
Their prior visibility becomes evidence supporting future visibility. The algorithm sees established engagement and predicts that additional distribution will produce more activity.
An underfunded company enters from the opposite position. It has fewer followers, fewer employees, less advertising money and a smaller historical record. Its first distribution pool is very limited. That produces fewer reactions. The system interprets those limited reactions as evidence that the content has less predicted value.
Lower distribution creates lower engagement. Less people seeing you. Lower engagement supports lower future distribution. The original disadvantage becomes a continuing algorithmic judgment.
The company is then encouraged to purchase advertising from the platform that restricted its organic reach. Rewarding that same company for your very limited reach.
This produces a digital version of accumulated credit. Organizations that already possess attention receive greater opportunities to generate more of it. Organizations requiring an opportunity are asked to prove their value without receiving enough exposure to do so.
Small boosts for new authors, creators, publishers and small businesses cannot resolve that imbalance. Temporary placement support cannot reproduce the financial resources, audience history, staffing capacity and recognition held by dominant organizations.
Quality Is Not the Controlling Standard
Platforms frequently present their ranking systems as tools for finding relevant, valuable or satisfying content. Quality can matter, but it is not the controlling standard.
A carefully documented investigation may require several minutes of focused reading. A provocative sentence may generate immediate replies in seconds. A detailed analysis may send a reader to an independent website. A short conflict-driven post may keep the person moving through hundreds of platform-controlled reactions.
The platform’s commercial interests do not always align with the public’s informational interests.
Accuracy does not automatically produce high predicted engagement. Public importance does not automatically generate viewing completion. Journalistic effort does not guarantee immediate reactions. A story can matter deeply and still perform poorly inside a system optimized to measure rapid behavioral responses.
This changes what gets created. Publishers learn that complex subjects must compete against outrage, entertainment, personal conflict and emotionally engineered material. Creators shorten explanations, intensify headlines and package work around the demands of the feed.
The algorithm does not only distribute culture. It pressures culture to reshape itself for algorithmic approval.
Supporting the System
Using a platform does not automatically mean a person endorses its structure. We are simply stuck with it.
Independent publishers, artists, small businesses and ordinary users often remain because their audiences have been concentrated there. Leaving can mean surrendering years of relationships, followers and work. The platforms have made participation difficult to avoid while making dependable access impossible to guarantee.
Financial support has a more direct effect. Advertising purchases, paid subscriptions and investor capital sustain the systems that rank users and monetize controlled attention.
The contradiction is difficult to escape. Small organizations may need the platforms to remain visible, yet every paid promotion strengthens the marketplace that weakened their unpaid reach. They are charged for partial access to audiences they spent years building.
That is not a normal social relationship. It is platform dependency.
The Coming Convergence
The greatest concern is not any single ranking change. It is the convergence of identity, reputation, visibility, payment and access.
X already possesses identity verification, subscriptions, advertising, creator payments, behavioral prediction, account labeling and visibility enforcement. Connecting these systems more closely would allow economic and reputational consequences to follow the same internal assessments. Even when users pay for identity verification, a blue badge on Facebook or another platform provides no guarantee of fair treatment, dependable reach or access to their existing audience.
Other platforms possess comparable components. They maintain identity records, advertising profiles, payment systems, content classifications, recommendation histories and monetization requirements.
No public declaration announcing a social-credit system would be required. The infrastructure could develop gradually under the language of personalization, safety, relevance, trust and user experience.
A system becomes socially powerful when it can determine who is seen.
It becomes economically powerful when it can determine who earns.
It becomes institutionally powerful when its decisions cannot be independently examined or meaningfully appealed.
When one company controls all three, the public is no longer dealing with a basic social platform. Those days are over. Users are being directed toward whatever is popular, profitable or most likely to make these companies richer.
The Digital Public Square Is Privately Scored
The modern public square is not fully public. It is hosted by corporations that reserve the right to rank every participant.
Users do not enter with equal visibility. Publishers do not receive equal access to followers. Businesses do not compete on quality alone. Existing power, accumulated engagement, financial resources and platform relationships influence who receives another opportunity.
People are told to build audiences, but the platform retains control over reaching them. They are told to create better content, but the definition of better is tied to predicted platform activity. They are told that paid promotion can solve the reach problem, turning restricted visibility into a product available for purchase.
The platform creates the scarcity, controls the scoring system and sells relief from the outcome.
We know this. We can confirm it. We have documented it. Anyone who refuses to examine the evidence is overlooking one of the most consequential convergences of private control ever assembled. If Flock cameras raised concerns about surveillance in public spaces, these systems reach even deeper into personal digital behavior by continuously measuring, predicting and influencing how people interact.
Welcome to the social-media credit system. Those who once opposed behavioral scoring but now support and cheerlead these companies are helping finance and normalize the private scoring infrastructure they once claimed to reject.
The Platforms Are Not Isolated
The major social platforms do not operate as entirely separate digital environments. Official records establish that several of these companies participate in shared systems for content identification, behavioral intelligence, coordinated enforcement and commercial audience activation.
The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism operates a cross-platform database through which participating companies can submit and search digital fingerprints of qualifying content. Meta, Microsoft, YouTube and Twitter—now X—created the original infrastructure. TikTok later joined GIFCT. Content identified by one company can enter the review and enforcement systems of other participating platforms.
The Tech Coalition’s Lantern program extends this connection beyond matching identical content. Participating companies can securely share account information, URLs, payment identifiers, content hashes and behavioral indicators connected to confirmed abusive activity. Other companies can use those signals to locate related conduct within their services and determine whether enforcement is required.
Lantern is hosted through ThreatExchange, an information-sharing system developed by Meta. Official participation records include Google, Meta, Microsoft and X. Lantern reported that more than two million signals supported more than 350,000 enforcement actions across participating services through 2025.
A separate connection exists inside the advertising economy. Adobe Experience Platform allows organizations to activate audience profiles across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok and X using hashed email addresses and other identifiers. Google Ads provides access across Google properties, including YouTube. This infrastructure allows the same commercial audience classification to be introduced into several major platforms without requiring those platforms to operate one public database.
These systems do not establish one confirmed universal score assigned to every person. They prove that content signals, account indicators, behavioral intelligence, identity markers and commercial audience classifications can move through shared or interoperable infrastructure.
A platform’s internal ranking score may remain private, but the environment surrounding that score is connected. One company can identify a signal, another can receive it, and several can use related identifiers to control visibility, advertising access, account treatment or enforcement within their own systems.
The public is not entering a collection of independent social networks. It is entering an interconnected platform economy capable of evaluating people, matching identities, exchanging selected intelligence and producing consequences across multiple services.
TRJ Verdict
Congratulations! The age of the neutral social-media feed is over.
Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, LinkedIn, X and other major platforms operate as private algorithmic governance systems built around behavioral prediction, automated ranking and the commercial control of attention. They do not merely host communication. They continuously evaluate users, content and activity before deciding what receives visibility, what remains buried, what generates income and what reaches an audience.
These systems are not isolated. Official documentation establishes shared content databases, cross-platform behavioral signals, coordinated enforcement infrastructure and commercial audience pathways connecting major parts of the platform economy. Content fingerprints can move through shared detection systems. Selected account and behavioral indicators can support enforcement across participating services. Hashed identities and commercial audience classifications can be activated across multiple advertising platforms.
The surveillance is official. Major platforms continuously observe behavior, analyze engagement and convert activity into private signals governing visibility, advertising and enforcement. Through shared databases and interoperable systems, selected signals can travel beyond the platform where the activity originated—all in the name of protection.
X’s Phoenix architecture makes this reality unusually visible. Posts are scored according to predicted behavior, adjusted through boosts and discounts, examined by visibility systems and distributed according to platform priorities. The final feed is not a neutral record of what people published. It is the product of automated prediction, filtering, ranking and commercial intervention.
This is not yet one official social-credit score governing every part of a person’s life. It is something quieter, distributed and harder to challenge: an interconnected network of private scoring environments capable of shaping reputation, visibility, opportunity and income across some of the world’s most powerful communication platforms. These systems do not need to display a number to impose consequences. They can act silently through ranking, restriction, recommendation, identity matching, advertising access and monetization.
The economic imbalance cannot be ignored. Wealthy companies arrive with the funding, recognition, staffing capacity, audience history and accumulated behavioral signals needed to satisfy the algorithms. Underfunded organizations receive limited initial distribution, are judged by the weak engagement produced by that limited exposure and are invited to purchase the visibility they could not obtain organically.
Paying for verification does not correct that imbalance. A blue badge may confirm identity or subscription status, but it does not guarantee fair treatment, dependable reach or access to an existing audience. Temporary boosts for new creators and publishers cannot reproduce the financial resources, audience history and institutional recognition held by dominant organizations.
Using these platforms does not mean that every person endorses their structure. People, publishers and businesses are trapped inside communication systems that have become necessary for public visibility while remaining controlled by private companies.
Anyone who believes they are simply using a social platform has another reality to confront.
They are entering interconnected, privately governed attention markets where every action supplies data, every post faces judgment, selected signals can cross platform boundaries and every opportunity may depend on assessments the public is never permitted to see.
TRJ RE-CAP
These platforms collect behavioral signals, predict what will hold attention, control distribution and place advertising inside that controlled stream. Longer sessions create more opportunities to display advertisements, sell promotions, collect data and increase conversions.
Their public explanations emphasize relevance, personalization, safety and user satisfaction. Their technical and financial documents describe behavioral prediction, viewing time, advertising clicks, conversions, enforcement signals and revenue. Those are interconnected parts of the same system:
Observe behavior → assign predictions → control visibility → increase platform activity → sell access to attention.
The platforms are not fully isolated. Official documentation establishes shared content-detection databases, cross-platform safety intelligence, coordinated enforcement infrastructure and commercial audience pathways. Selected content, account and behavioral signals can move beyond the service where the activity originated, while hashed identities and audience classifications can be activated across several advertising environments—all in the name of protection, relevance and personalization.
Small publishers provide content and bring audiences onto these platforms. The platforms restrict direct access to those audiences, judge future distribution through engagement signals and offer paid promotion as the solution. Established organizations can purchase visibility and benefit from accumulated attention, while underfunded companies must compete inside systems already shaped by money, recognition and historical reach.
GIFCT connects platforms through shared content fingerprints and incident coordination. Lantern shares account, payment, URL, content and behavioral signals across participating companies. Meta’s ThreatExchange hosts Lantern’s technical system. Adobe enables commercial audience profiles and hashed identities to be activated across major platforms. Each platform converts behavior into private ranking, advertising and enforcement assessments.
X — For You Home Timeline Recommendations
Source: X Help Center, X Corp.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
X — X For You Feed Algorithm, August 2026 Reader Edition
Source text: xAI/X official x-algorithm repository README.
Reader-edition formatting and preservation: The Realist Juggernaut, August 2026.
This reader edition is not an official X-issued PDF. (Free Download)
X — Official GitHub Repository Capture
Source: xAI/X, xai-org/x-algorithm, “Algorithm powering the For You feed on X.”
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026.
This archival capture is not an official X-issued PDF. (Free Download)
Facebook and Instagram — How AI Influences What You See
Author: Nick Clegg, President, Global Affairs.
Publisher: Meta.
Publication date: June 29, 2023.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
Meta — 2026: AI Drives Performance
Publisher: Meta.
Publication date: January 28, 2026.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
Instagram — Instagram Ranking Explained
Author: Adam Mosseri.
Publisher: Instagram/Meta.
Publication date: May 31, 2023.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
TikTok — How TikTok Recommends Videos #ForYou
Publisher: TikTok Newsroom.
Publication date: June 18, 2020.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
YouTube — How YouTube Recommendations Work
Publisher: YouTube Help, Google LLC.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
LinkedIn — How the Feed Ranks Content
Publisher: LinkedIn Corporation.
Archival PDF captured by The Realist Juggernaut on August 22, 2026. (Free Download)
Tech Coalition. Expanding Lantern to the Financial Sector. August 22, 2024. (Free Download)
Tech Coalition. Lantern Transparency Report 2025: Signal Sharing for Child Safety. Published April 28, 2026. (Free Download)
Tech Coalition. Lantern: Advancing Child Safety Through Signal Sharing. Official Lantern program documentation. (Free Download)
Adobe. Destinations Overview | Adobe Experience Platform. Updated May 23, 2026. (Free Download)
Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism. HSDB Taxonomy. Version 1.0. © 2022 GIFCT. (Free Download)
Naureen Chowdhury Fink and Erin Saltman. Fighting Terror with Tech: The Evolution of the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism. 2025. SSRN Paper No. 5405146. (Free Download)
The Algorithmic Credit System — How Platforms Score Human Attention
This is not speculation. The ranking systems, shared databases, enforcement signals and commercial audience pathways are documented through official disclosures.
𝕏 File #001 — Phoenix Predicts and Ranks Behavior
X’s Phoenix model predicts whether a user will reply, repost, share, open media, visit a profile, follow an account or spend time viewing a post. Those predictions are weighted before content is ranked. Separate visibility systems can allow, restrict or remove posts from recommendation.
File #002 — Meta Converts Attention Into Performance
Meta states that its artificial-intelligence systems predict what content users may find valuable across Facebook and Instagram. Its financial disclosures connect ranking improvements with higher viewing activity, advertising clicks, conversions and business revenue.
File #003 — Instagram Uses Thousands of Signals
Instagram operates separate ranking systems across Feed, Stories, Explore and Reels. These systems evaluate activity, relationships, post information and predicted actions before determining which content receives visibility.
File #004 — TikTok Weights Behavioral Responses
TikTok ranks videos using viewing completion, sharing, comments, follows, searches and other behavioral signals. The company acknowledges that recommendation systems can produce filter bubbles and engagement bias.
File #005 — YouTube Processes Billions of Signals
YouTube states that its recommendation system learns from more than 80 billion pieces of information each day. Viewing history, searches, subscriptions, reactions, negative feedback and satisfaction surveys help determine what appears next.
File #006 — LinkedIn Scores Professional Relevance
LinkedIn uses hundreds of signals involving post context, professional profiles, networks and activity. Its artificial-intelligence systems determine which professional voices, information and opportunities receive placement inside each member’s feed.
File #007 — GIFCT Connects Content Detection Across Platforms
Meta, Microsoft, YouTube and Twitter—now X—created the infrastructure behind the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism. TikTok later joined GIFCT. Its Hash-Sharing Database allows participating companies to submit and search digital fingerprints of qualifying content, attach classification labels and coordinate responses to violent incidents across platform boundaries.
File #008 — Lantern Shares Account and Behavioral Intelligence
The Tech Coalition’s Lantern program allows participating companies to share account information, URLs, payment identifiers, content hashes and behavioral indicators connected to confirmed abusive activity. Lantern operates through Meta’s ThreatExchange infrastructure. Official participation records include Google, Meta, Microsoft and X.
File #009 — Shared Signals Produce Cross-Platform Enforcement
Lantern reported that more than two million signals supported more than 350,000 enforcement actions through 2025. A signal originating with one company can help another participating company identify related accounts, content or behavior inside its own service.
File #010 — Commercial Identities Travel Through Advertising Infrastructure
Adobe Experience Platform allows organizations to activate audience profiles across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok and X using hashed email addresses and other identifiers. Google Ads provides a commercial pathway into Google properties, including YouTube. The same audience classification can therefore be introduced into several major advertising environments.
Operational Finding
The major platforms do not operate as isolated digital environments. Official documentation establishes shared content-detection databases, cross-platform safety intelligence, coordinated enforcement systems and commercial audience pathways connecting major parts of the platform economy.
The surveillance is official. Major platforms continuously observe behavior, analyze engagement and convert activity into private signals governing visibility, advertising and enforcement. Through shared databases and interoperable systems, selected signals can travel beyond the platform where the activity originated—all in the name of protection.
This is not yet one official social-credit score governing every part of a person’s life. It is an interconnected network of private and largely invisible scoring environments capable of shaping reputation, visibility, opportunity and income across some of the world’s most powerful communication platforms.
These systems do not need to display a number to impose consequences. They can operate silently through ranking, recommendation, restriction, identity matching, advertising eligibility, enforcement and monetization.
Users provide the content. Users provide the behavioral data. Users bring the audiences. The platforms evaluate the activity, control the distribution and sell access to the resulting attention.
Welcome to the private algorithmic credit system.
🔥 NOW AVAILABLE! 🔥
🔥 NOW AVAILABLE! 🔥
📖 INK & FIRE: BOOK 1 📖
A bold and unapologetic collection of poetry that ignites the soul. Ink & Fire dives deep into raw emotions, truth, and the human experience—unfiltered and untamed
🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/9EoGKzh
🔥 Paperback 👉 https://a.co/d/9EoGKzh
🔥 Hardcover Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/0ITmDIB
🔥 NOW AVAILABLE! 🔥
📖 INK & FIRE: BOOK 2 📖
A bold and unapologetic collection of poetry that ignites the soul. Ink & Fire dives deep into raw emotions, truth, and the human experience—unfiltered and untamed just like the first one.
🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/1xlx7J2
🔥 Paperback 👉 https://a.co/d/a7vFHN6
🔥 Hardcover Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/efhu1ON
Get your copy today and experience poetry like never before. #InkAndFire #PoetryUnleashed #FuelTheFire
🚨 NOW AVAILABLE! 🚨
📖 THE INEVITABLE: THE DAWN OF A NEW ERA 📖
A powerful, eye-opening read that challenges the status quo and explores the future unfolding before us. Dive into a journey of truth, change, and the forces shaping our world.
🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/0FzX6MH
🔥 Paperback 👉 https://a.co/d/2IsxLof
🔥 Hardcover Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/bz01raP
Get your copy today and be part of the new era. #TheInevitable #TruthUnveiled #NewEra
🚀 NOW AVAILABLE! 🚀
📖 THE FORGOTTEN OUTPOST 📖
The Cold War Moon Base They Swore Never Existed
What if the moon landing was just the cover story?
Dive into the boldest investigation The Realist Juggernaut has ever published—featuring declassified files, ghost missions, whistleblower testimony, and black-budget secrets buried in lunar dust.
🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/2Mu03Iu
🛸 Paperback Coming Soon
Discover the base they never wanted you to find. TheForgottenOutpost #RealistJuggernaut #MoonBaseTruth #ColdWarSecrets #Declassified
Sponsored • TRJ Ads
Inquiries: contact@therealistjuggernaut.com
We’re rats in a maze with unseen observers wagering what we will do next. Very dismaying. In particular, the LI model looking for “relevance” or credibility… so if your career was X and you decide in retirement you’d like to dabble in Y, you get shadow banned bc you’re not a SME?
HR used to send around these mandatory “educational” things that we had to watch. I remember trying to zip through it and get back to work, but if you tried to flip to the next screen too fast, it would mildly reprove you “Please take time to read and comprehend this page.” 😑 When you mentioned they watch to see how long you spend on a YT vid… watching, rewinding, screengrabs, etc…it reminded me of that. Dilbert suddenly isn’t so funny.
Thank you very much, Darryl.
Your HR training example actually illustrates part of the concern extremely well. Once systems begin measuring not only what we interact with, but how long we remain there, what we revisit, what we skip, and other behavioral signals, the platform can build conclusions from activity that may have an entirely different explanation from what the system assumes. A person’s established professional history does not define the boundaries of everything that person is capable of understanding, researching, discussing, or becoming knowledgeable about later in life.
People change careers, develop new expertise, pursue new interests, and spend years studying subjects completely outside their original profession. I’m definitely one of those people. An algorithmic relevance system cannot necessarily understand that development simply by examining someone’s established professional identity and behavioral history.
That is where these systems can become restrictive rather than merely useful. And yes, the Dilbert comparison definitely hits differently once you start looking at how much behavioral measurement has become normalized. I’m personally tired of dealing with these corporations, and I hope that one day I can be part of something that helps create change for the better and moves things in the right direction. I’m trying to do that now with these articles so people get a heads-up, but in the current cycle, it’s difficult.
Thanks again for taking the time to read the article and share your perspective, Darryl. I greatly appreciate it. I hope you have a great evening. 😎