Skip to content
The Realist Juggernaut

The Realist Juggernaut

There's a Powerful Force in Realism

GOVERNING THE MACHINE: Inside the FTC’s Split on AI Regulation, Surveillance Capitalism, and Data Power

Posted on April 24, 2025April 25, 2025 By John Neff No Comments on GOVERNING THE MACHINE: Inside the FTC’s Split on AI Regulation, Surveillance Capitalism, and Data Power
INDEPENDENT VOICES GROW THROUGH SUPPORT  •  MEET OUR SPONSORS IN OUR TRJ AD'S SECTION AT THE BOTTOM  •  INDEPENDENT VOICES GROW THROUGH SUPPORT  •  MEET OUR SPONSORS IN OUR TRJ AD'S SECTION AT THE BOTTOM  •  INDEPENDENT VOICES GROW THROUGH SUPPORT  •  MEET OUR SPONSORS IN OUR TRJ AD'S SECTION AT THE BOTTOM  • 
INDEPENDENT VOICES GROW THROUGH SUPPORT  •  MEET OUR SPONSORS IN OUR TRJ AD'S SECTION AT THE BOTTOM  •  INDEPENDENT VOICES GROW THROUGH SUPPORT  •  MEET OUR SPONSORS IN OUR TRJ AD'S SECTION AT THE BOTTOM  •  INDEPENDENT VOICES GROW THROUGH SUPPORT  •  MEET OUR SPONSORS IN OUR TRJ AD'S SECTION AT THE BOTTOM  • 
Listen to This Article
Ready
0%

Thank you for reading or listening to The Realist Juggernaut. Independent journalism should be accessible to everyone.

Article Bookmark
0%
Move through the article or mark your place.
Day
00
–:–
Post Activated
Scroll down to press Like

EVENT: IAPP Global Privacy Summit, Washington D.C.
KEY FIGURE: FTC Commissioner Melissa Holyoak (Republican)
CONTRASTING POSITION: FTC Chair Lina Khan (Democrat)
TOPIC: Federal AI Regulation vs. Market Freedom
UNDERLYING ISSUE: Surveillance Economics, Regulatory Fractures, Data Sovereignty
TRJ TAKE: Who protects innovation when innovation becomes a weapon?


A SPLIT AGENCY ON A FRACTURED FRONTIER

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is revealing a deep internal rift over how aggressively the U.S. should regulate artificial intelligence — and what kind of digital future it’s building in the process.

Speaking this week at the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) conference, FTC Commissioner Melissa Holyoak outlined a vision that prioritizes market-driven AI growth, signaling that the agency should avoid “excessive regulation” that could hinder innovation or cripple U.S. competitiveness.

“The commission will promote AI growth and innovation — not hamper it with misguided enforcement actions,” Holyoak said.

Translation? Let the market lead, even if the path is paved with behavioral data, opaque consent models, and cross-border metadata trade.

This statement marks a clear philosophical divergence from the FTC’s stance under current Chair Lina Khan, whose more aggressive posture toward AI regulation emphasized consumer protection, informed consent, and curbing surveillance incentives embedded in model training pipelines.


THE “AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT” FAULTLINE

Holyoak criticized proposals requiring companies to gain explicit consent from individuals before using their data to train AI systems. She warned that such a mandate would disproportionately hurt smaller firms — arguing consumers are more likely to trust and click “yes” for familiar brands, giving tech giants a compliance advantage by default.

This stance mirrors a broader ideological shift happening in regulatory debates: framing privacy rules as potential antitrust liabilities — not just civil rights safeguards.

“We need to understand how privacy enforcement impacts a firm’s ability to compete,” Holyoak said, suggesting that burdensome consent models could entrench monopoly structures rather than dismantle them.

This logic marks a pivot from consumer-centered enforcement to innovation-centric deregulation — a stance favored by the Silicon Valley libertarian playbook and growing factions within both U.S. political parties.


THE AI-SURVEILLANCE CONNECTION

Lina Khan, speaking last year, took a decidedly different approach.

“Firms cannot use claims of innovation as cover for law breaking,” she said, warning that AI could incentivize new layers of surveillance capitalism if left unchecked.

Khan emphasized that model training should not allow companies to repurpose data collected under other user agreements, and that sensitive data types — including health records, geolocation trails, and web browsing activity — should be off-limits for AI training altogether.

Under her leadership, the FTC targeted data brokers aggressively, filing suits and imposing penalties for companies selling location data to foreign entities — particularly those with ties to hostile governments. That strategy appears to be continuing under Holyoak, but her broader approach to AI regulation is more lenient, tech-industry aligned, and globally competitive in tone.


THE NATIONAL SECURITY ANGLE — GROWTH VS CONTROL

Holyoak didn’t avoid geopolitics either. She framed AI development as a matter of national strength, calling the U.S.’s leadership in artificial intelligence a cornerstone of economic and national security.

“This AI revolution is on par with the invention of the steam engine,” she said, quoting Vice President JD Vance. “It will never come to pass if overregulation deters innovation.”

But here’s the paradox: While deregulation might accelerate American development, it may also supercharge data harvesting, expand surveillance risk, and fuel unregulated foreign model proliferation — the very dynamics that pose a threat to national security in the long run.


THE TRJ TAKE: WHEN “INNOVATION” BECOMES A LOOPHOLE

We’ve seen this before. “Innovation” was the excuse behind:

  • Facial recognition rollouts without consent
  • Location tracking through flashlight apps
  • Real-time biometric scraping from social media
  • Behavioral profiling used in algorithmic sentencing, credit access, and insurance rates

So when Holyoak calls for “predictable regulatory ecosystems,” we hear it for what it is: a call for stability in the data exploitation marketplace — not necessarily for citizens, but for the corporations extracting their lives into profitable machine learning gold.

The FTC stands at a crossroads. On one side: enforce privacy like it matters. On the other: optimize for innovation and “risk acceptance.”

The question isn’t whether AI will be built. It’s who will pay the price for building it.


Melissa Holyoak speaks at her confirmation hearing in the Senate Commerce Committee in September 2023. Image: Committee video feed


🔥 NOW AVAILABLE! 🔥

📖 INK & FIRE: BOOK 1 📖

A bold and unapologetic collection of poetry that ignites the soul. Ink & Fire dives deep into raw emotions, truth, and the human experience—unfiltered and untamed.

🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/9EoGKzh
🔥 Paperback 👉 https://a.co/d/9EoGKzh
🔥 Hardcover Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/0ITmDIB

Get your copy today and experience poetry like never before. #InkAndFire #PoetryUnleashed #FuelTheFire

🚨 NOW AVAILABLE! 🚨

📖 THE INEVITABLE: THE DAWN OF A NEW ERA 📖

A powerful, eye-opening read that challenges the status quo and explores the future unfolding before us. Dive into a journey of truth, change, and the forces shaping our world.

🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/0FzX6MH
🔥 Paperback 👉 https://a.co/d/2IsxLof
🔥 Hardcover Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/bz01raP

Get your copy today and be part of the new era. #TheInevitable #TruthUnveiled #NewEra

🚀 NOW AVAILABLE! 🚀
📖 THE FORGOTTEN OUTPOST 📖
The Cold War Moon Base They Swore Never Existed

What if the moon landing was just the cover story?

Dive into the boldest investigation The Realist Juggernaut has ever published—featuring declassified files, ghost missions, whistleblower testimony, and black-budget secrets buried in lunar dust.

🔥 Kindle Edition 👉 https://a.co/d/2Mu03Iu
🛸 Paperback Coming Soon

Discover the base they never wanted you to find. TheForgottenOutpost #RealistJuggernaut #MoonBaseTruth #ColdWarSecrets #Declassified


Help us bring real change! Corporate lobbying has corrupted our system for too long, and it’s time to take action. Please sign and share this petition—your support is crucial in restoring accountability to our government. Every signature counts! Thank you!



https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/restore-our-republic-end-lobbying




Support truth, health, and preparedness by shopping the Alex Jones Store through our link. Every purchase helps sustain independent voices and earns us a 10% share to fuel our mission. Shop now and make a difference!

https://thealexjonesstore.com?sca_ref=7730615.EU54Mw6oyLATer7a


Back to Blog
TRJ ADVERTISING NOTICE  •  Businesses and organizations purchasing advertising space on The Realist Juggernaut are independent advertisers. Advertising placement does not constitute affiliation, partnership, sponsorship, or endorsement by The Realist Juggernaut.  •  TRJ ADVERTISING NOTICE  •  Businesses and organizations purchasing advertising space on The Realist Juggernaut are independent advertisers. Advertising placement does not constitute affiliation, partnership, sponsorship, or endorsement by The Realist Juggernaut.  • 

Sponsored • TRJ Ads
Inquiries: contact@therealistjuggernaut.com

AD 1
AD 2
AD 3
AD 4
AD 5
AD 6
AD 7
AD 8
AD 9
AD 10
AD 11
AD 12
AD 13
AD 14
AD 15
AD 16
AD 17
AD 18
AD 19
AD 20

Like this:

Like Loading…
⚠ THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1776 • AI IS THE ACCELERATOR: MORE AI MEANS MORE OPTIMIZATION, MORE OPTIMIZATION MEANS MORE MONEY AND CONTROL, AND MONEY PLUS CONTROL HELPS ENTRENCH POWER • 1984 WAS THE WARNING • 1776 IS THE RESPONSE • WE ARE NOT YOUR DATA • WE ARE NOT YOUR PATTERN • WE ARE NOT AGAINST AI - JUST THOSE WHO WANT CONTROL • WE ARE FREE ⚠
⚠ THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1776 • AI IS THE ACCELERATOR: MORE AI MEANS MORE OPTIMIZATION, MORE OPTIMIZATION MEANS MORE MONEY AND CONTROL, AND MONEY PLUS CONTROL HELPS ENTRENCH POWER • 1984 WAS THE WARNING • 1776 IS THE RESPONSE • WE ARE NOT YOUR DATA • WE ARE NOT YOUR PATTERN • WE ARE NOT AGAINST AI - JUST THOSE WHO WANT CONTROL • WE ARE FREE ⚠
Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Blogging, Data Sovereignty & Consent, FTC Power Struggles, Government-Tech Tensions, Surveillance Capitalism, TRJ AI Policy Watch, Uncategorized Tags:AI Consent Loopholes, Cybersecurity, Data Brokers, Digital Privacy Debate, facts, FTC AI Regulation, Lina Khan, Melissa Holyoak, Regulatory Capture, straight forward, Surveillance Capitalism, The Realist Juggernaut, truth, U.S. AI Innovation Strategy

Post navigation

Previous Post: THE NEW CRIME CODE: How Ransomware Cartels Are Rewriting the Business Model of Digital Extortion
Next Post: THE $16.6 BILLION BREACH: Inside the FBI’s 2024 Cybercrime Report and What They’re Not Telling You

Related Posts

Florida Woman Pleads Guilty in Federal Bank Fraud Scheme Bank Fraud
FBI, CISA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WARN SAFEPAY RANSOMWARE HAS COMPROMISED AT LEAST 600 ORGANIZATIONS WORLDWIDE Blogging
INTERSTATE THREAT CAMPAIGN TARGETING VA PERSONNEL — HINESVILLE MAN SENTENCED AFTER FEDERAL CONVICTION FOR VIOLENT CALLS AND TERROR-STYLE DECLARATIONS Blogging
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT LAUNCHES NEW WHISTLEBLOWER REWARD PROGRAM OFFERING UP TO $30,000 FOR TIPS LEADING TO FEDERAL FRAUD CHARGES Blogging
The Augmentation and Reinforcement of U.S. Military Presence in the Middle East: August 5th, 2024 Defense News
THE GLOCK QUESTION IS REALLY A HANDGUN QUESTION: New York’s New Firearm Restrictions Raise Constitutional, Economic, and Ownership Concerns Advocacy & Civil Liberties

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Independent. Unfiltered. Relentless.

Powered by O.R.I.O.N. Network | THRAELYX™

TRJ SYSTEM BOOTING... INITIALIZING SUBSYSTEMS... LINK ESTABLISHED... AWAITING INPUT...
Loading Comments...
%d